Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.12UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.14UNLIKELY
Fear
0.09UNLIKELY
Joy
0.59LIKELY
Sadness
0.51LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.77LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.48UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.9LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.78LIKELY
Extraversion
0.82LIKELY
Agreeableness
0.51LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.63LIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
race and culture
Acts 15: Food Fight
Food Fight: the battle for preferences, holiday food and traditions.
Food is family, food is identity.
Soul food with sisters, Italian night, comfort food...holiday food.
Food is closely linked with memory, family, ethnicity...we don’t prepare it that way...
Peter and the food culture, influence of friends and influencers, power people...people who could shun him, shape him.
He knew better, he taught better, he was better...but men from James got to him.
Big Idea; IN MATTERS OF CULTURE; DO WE FIGHT OR FALTER?
READ
Acts 15:1-21 is about dealing with a doctrinal issue that became an issue because of culture
WE HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO SEE PRACTICALS HERE, AS PAUL AND PETER BOTH LIVE OUT THE IMPLICATIONS OF THIS RULING LATER IN OUR NEW TESTAMENTS.
Jewish culture invaded the gentile church.
Paul and Barnabas disagree but then are compelled to see the big boys in Jerusalem about the issue.
They go and there is discussion.
Then Peter makes his case based on Cornelius
John makes the final statement that closes the deal.
They break it into simple pieces around CULTURE
Food culture and sex culture.
Who we eat with and who we mate with.
Eating and sleeping.
So the issues are Leviticus based and also about cultural comfort, what is familiar to us.
The issue seems resolved.
Be pure.
Be considerate of others.
No surprise there so far
Galatians 2:1 -10
Peter falls into the same cultural paradigm.
Why? Men from James.
The leader of Jerusalem.
The big cheese.
His friend.
The guy who called the ball in the council meeting.
He caved to cultural pressure because it made him feel Jewish....it was home base.
Paul has to call him out.
Galatians 2:11-14
He confronts duplicity for the wrong reasons.
He is actually going against Greek culture in this instance.
Greek body image worship.
For Tim TO agree to this was counter cultural.
For Paul to ask about it was culturally sensible.
Both actions are for the gospel.
For Titus whines being compelled it was wrong.
The ACT is not the issue here, it’s the cultural mandate that makes it good or bad.
Immorality is always wrong, but this cultural issue was forcing an adaptation.
Another Application OF THIS PRINCIPLE IN PAULS MINISTRY
1Corinthians 10:14-22
· Culture often allows what God may forbid.
We reason, we alter.
God knows so he says the things he says because he knows.
Paul here is telling us “what God knows” in opposition to what culture knows.
Not only does culture allow it, but it sells it, so that we can make a choice.
The food issue; 1 Cor 10.
It’s a huge issue.
Good food was tainted food.
Demons are at supper.
Guess who’s coming to dinner.
Why eat that food?
Don’t want to offend the host.
Culture, again.
This issue is all over the NT.
Are we aware of our cultural conditioning?
Do we fear the idols?
Knowing things that influence us, not assuming we can manage their influences trusting what God has said...IDOLS are not to be managed, BUT to be toppled!
· That food is not benign.
It is tainted.
Tainted by its prior use.
Offered to a demon, so if you eat it you “participate” with.
Demon.
The argument comes from the body connection to the Lords supper.
If you “take in” things to your body that have been offered to demons, you are taking in demonic forces.
Just the way that you take in the body of Christ when you take the Lords Supper.
Application: be careful what we allow into us.
What defiles us?
Culture is not innocent.
Our culture makes things for our consumption: media, ideologies, products, and with each of these come the connected influence of the men and women who create them.
There are no morally ambiguous acts.
All that we consume impacts us in some way for good or for I’ll.
· What you watch, listen to, read, allow to influence you.
Rationalism?
Your past experiences?
My family has a culture.
A way they speak and act.
If you don’t speak and act a certain way there is punishment.
It can vary from simple ridicule, to verbal attack.
Shunning and other forms of manipulation.
This weekend I confronted this behavior and mixed it up with my parents a little bit.
One of my siblings has gone too far for too long and ya damaging my parents and the children.
A culture around money and how we spend it.
Who gets what....
How does it impact us today.
Let’s consider a few modern examples.
Cite them here:
1: the brother whose culture accepts the treatment of women and wives as property, or as less valuable, so he treats his Christian wife like a citizen of his homeland not a citizen of the kingdom.
TRIBALISM
2: The family whose tribal culture mandates that they marry a certain individual regardless of whether they belong to Christ.
3: the American (dc) family that bows toe the cultural pressure to make their children “excellent” and ‘well rounded’ and enrolls them in every possible extracurricular even if it competes with personal devotion or availability to study the bible and follow Jesus.
IDOLATRY
4.The college student whose family culture pressures them to pack their calendar with accomplishments and an aggressive graduation schedule because the financial sacrifice to put them into college is so high.
We call some of these things “high performance” but is our performance culture really just worship of success?
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9