Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.14UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.49UNLIKELY
Fear
0.14UNLIKELY
Joy
0.49UNLIKELY
Sadness
0.53LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.6LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.01UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.93LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.68LIKELY
Extraversion
0.21UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.64LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.71LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
“The Seeking Savior”- Part II
Introduction:
            Many claim to be fundamental in their doctrine.
But just how many are really fundamental in their teaching or are just fundamental in their title only, not really knowing what the word fundamental means.
Fundamentalism by definition means a strong adherence to any set of beliefs in the face of criticism and unpopularity.
What some are unknowing of it that the word fundamental was coined in the reformed church in the early part of the 20th century.
So to truly be a fundamentalist means that you hold strictly to beliefs that are fundamental to your belief.
So to be a Baptist fundamentalist means that you hold, without apology, to the fundamental beliefs of the Baptists.
I bring this up because with some folks when you start to preach on the sovereignty of God in one way or the other, they start to get a little nervous.
And I do not what you to misunderstand or miss this point, the sovereignty of God in most certainly seen in John 4, without a doubt.
I had an individual the other day pick up one of the CD’s from my sermon on the Woman at the well, part I from last time, and called me on the phone after listening to it.
They had one question and it went something like this.
“If what you say is true about the sovereignty of God, then why do we pray?”
I love answering those questions.
I could speak all day on this subject.
Over the years this subject has enrapture me to the point that if I am not careful, that is all that I would ever preach or teach on.
The question came as a response to something that I said in the sermon last, “God has a sovereign plan and nothing we do will change that plan.”
So the question that is most assuredly on most people’s minds when you make such a statement is exactly what their question was, “Why do we pray?”
From there I was given the wonderful opportunity to explain to this person that though God has an absolute sovereign plan that will not be altered, part of that plan is the use of means; one being prayer.
God not only predetermines whatever will be but also predetermines how this will be brought to pass.
He uses our prayers to bring His sovereign plan to pass; He even uses lost people to bring about His sovereign plan.
Someone said one time, “What if I had never surrendered to the Lord then this or that would never have happened.”
In response to that someone said, “Yes, it would have happened, God would have risen up someone else to do it”.
It might surprise to know that neither one of those person’s are correct in their understanding of the sovereignty of God.
The correct view is that God no only predetermined the plan of this or that happening, but as part of His sovereign plan, He predetermined that persons surrender.
That is what we need to understand, that God does not only determine what WILL be (the ends), but He also determines HOW what will be will be (the means).
Unfortunately, some “fundamentalist” do not hold to this fundamental doctrine.
One said to me one time, “your belief in the sovereignty of God in neither biblical or Baptists”.
Really?
Let’s see.
Is it Biblical?
"But our God is in the heavens: he hath done whatsoever he hath pleased."
(Psalm 115:3, KJV) 
            "Whatsoever the LORD pleased, that did he in heaven, and in earth, in the seas, and all deep places."
(Psalm 135:6, KJV)
            "Yea, before the day was I am he; and there is none that can deliver out of my hand: I will work, and who shall let it?
" (Isaiah 43:13, KJV)
            "He stood, and measured the earth: he beheld, and drove asunder the nations; and the everlasting mountains were scattered, the perpetual hills did bow: his ways are everlasting."
(Habakkuk 3:6, KJV)
            "But he is in one mind, and who can turn him?
and what his soul desireth, even that he doeth."
(Job 23:13, KJV)
            "There are many devices in a man’s heart; nevertheless the counsel of the LORD, that shall stand."
(Proverbs 19:21, KJV)
            "There is no wisdom nor understanding nor counsel against the LORD."
(Proverbs 21:30, KJV)
            "I know that, whatsoever God doeth, it shall be for ever: nothing can be put to it, nor any thing taken from it: and God doeth it, that men should fear before him."
(Ecclesiastes 3:14, KJV)
            "For the LORD of hosts hath purposed, and who shall disannul it?
and his hand is stretched out, and who shall turn it back?"
(Isaiah 14:27, KJV)
            "Declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times the things that are not yet done, saying, My counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure:" (Isaiah 46:10, KJV)
            "And all the inhabitants of the earth are reputed as nothing: and he doeth according to his will in the army of heaven, and among the inhabitants of the earth: and none can stay his hand, or say unto him, What doest thou?" (Daniel 4:35, KJV)
            "In whom also we have obtained an inheritance, being predestinated according to the purpose of him who worketh all things after the counsel of his own will:" (Ephesians 1:11, KJV)
            "I know that thou canst do every thing, and that no thought can be withholden from thee." (Job 42:2, KJV)
            Is it Biblical?
I believe so.
Now, is it Baptist?
In other words, is this classical or fundamental Baptist doctrine?
According this person, no it is not.
But what does history tell us?
            John Leadley Dagg (1794-1884), born in Loudoun County, Virginia, lived to be over 90 years old.
When he dies in June 1884, he was one of the most respected men in American Baptist life and remains as one of the most profound thinkers produced by the Baptists.
Dagg spent his life defending the Doctrines of Grace and the Sovereignty of God.
In 1857 he wrote a book entitles “Manual of Theology” and stands as the first systematic theology book by a Baptist in America.
William Carey (1761-1834), Known as the Father of Modern Missions and a member of the Particular Baptist Church.
One of the founding members of the Baptist Missionary Society and was a staunch defender of the Doctrines of Grace until death on June 9, 1834 at the age of 72.
John A. Broadus (1827-1895), He was the first professor ot New Testament interpretation and Homiletics at the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary and the second president of the school.
A Profound teacher, Broadus served as the pastor of a Baptist Church in Charlottesville, Virginia.
During the Civil War, he served as Chaplain in Lee’s army in Northern Virginia.
Broadus is quoted as saying, “The people who sneer of what is called the Doctrines of Grace, might as well sneer at Mont Blanc.
I do not see how anyone who understands the Greek of the Apostle Paul can fail to see this….”
Charles H. Spurgeon (1834-1892), The Prince of Preachers.
Probably the best known of the Baptist leaders from the past.
Repeatedly preached to more than 10,000 people in the Metropolitan Tabernacle.
He was a heavy defender of the Doctrines of Grace and those sermons can still be read today.
James P. Boyce (1827-1888), The principle founder of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary and longtime pastor of Baptist Churches in Baltimore, Maryland.
His Abstract of Systematic Theology is his magnus opus and continues to be in print today and in staunchly a theology book that defends the Doctrines of Grace.
Andrew Fuller (1754-1815), The Grandfather of Modern Missions.
Fuller was a good friend of William Carey and stood strong against what is called hyper-Calvinism, and stood strong for the Sovereign of God.
Jonathan Edwards (1703-1758), Born and raised in the American Colonies, Edwards stand as a staunch defender of the Doctrines of Grace among American Baptists.
His most famous sermon, “Sinners in the Hands of an angry God”, emphasizes the just wrath of God on sin and sinners and the provision of God Salvation.
His sermons and books and can still be purchased and read online to this day.
John Bunyun (1628-1688), best known as the author of “Pilgrims Progress” was also a Baptist and a defender of the Doctrines of Grace.
Imprisoned for his faith from 1658-1666, while there is wrote “Pilgrims Progress” which stands as a favorite of the allegorical view of the Christ life.
Now, is it Biblical, I think so.
Is it Baptist, history proves there are those who, with strong conviction, stood on the Doctrines of Grace.
This is all fascinating, but what is the point to the text at hand.
There is a point, this has not just been a lesson in apologetics, the point is that as we look at the text in John 4, we see a Savior with a sovereign mission and I what you to understand that when the Lord has a Sovereign mission, nothing will hinder that mission, nothing!
I will be guarantee you that when we get to heaven and we meet the woman at the well that she will be so thankful that the sovereign purposes of God cannot be hindered and I know that I am.
We ended last time talking about our third point “A Son with a Petition”, as he “breaks the ice” in the conversation with this woman.
Breaking all the laws of tradition and would have causes the Pharisees to lose all posture if He was caught speaking with a woman period, much less a woman of Samaria who was a woman of loss living.
Let’s look at our next point.
I.                   The Sinner with a Prejudice (vs.
9)
This woman was also a product of the same prejudice that the Jews felt toward her.
The hatred among the Jews was reciprocated by the Samaritans.
This woman could not believe that Jesus, being a Jew, would speak to her at all.
Little did she know that she was talking to her creator.
II.
The Savior with a Prescription (vs.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9