Remember, You're a Christian
Introduction
Question
John 6:1-14
Application
The people recognized Jesus as the Messiah but wrongly equated that idea with political revolution.
The evangelist relates the immediate aftermath of the miracle: After the people saw the miraculous sign that Jesus did, they began to say, ‘Surely this is the Prophet who is to come into the world.’ Moses promised the Israelites, ‘The Lord your God will raise up for you a prophet like me from among your own brothers. You must listen to him’ (Deut. 18:15). Knowing this promise, and having seen Jesus provide food in the wilderness as Moses had done, the people concluded that Jesus was ‘the Prophet who is to come into the world’, the Prophet about whom Moses had spoken.
The evangelist adds, Jesus, knowing that they intended to come and make him king by force, withdrew again to a mountain by himself. Moses led Israel out of Egyptian captivity, and now this people wanted Jesus (whom they believed was the Prophet like Moses) to free them from Roman occupation. They wanted to ‘make him king by force’.
As you read the Gospel records, note that our Lord was never impressed by the great crowds. He knew that their motives were not pure and that most of them followed Him in order to watch His miracles of healing. “Bread and circuses” was Rome’s formula for keeping the people happy, and people today are satisfied with that kind of diet. Give them food and entertainment and they are happy. Rome set aside ninety-three days each year for public games at government expense. It was cheaper to entertain the crowds than to fight them or jail them.
God’s design was not that Jesus manifest Himself as an earthly king but as the Suffering Servant who would give His life as a ransom for many (Mark 10:45).
For one thing, they were eager to support Jesus when he gave them what they wanted. He had healed them and fed them; and they would thereupon have made him their leader. There is such a thing as a bought loyalty. There is such a thing as cupboard love. Dr Johnson, the great eighteenth-century man of letters, in one of his more cynical moments, defined gratitude as ‘a lively sense of favours still to come’.