Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.59LIKELY
Disgust
0.11UNLIKELY
Fear
0.07UNLIKELY
Joy
0.12UNLIKELY
Sadness
0.57LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.59LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.07UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.94LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.78LIKELY
Extraversion
0.31UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.46UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.74LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
*Understanding the Story of Matthew*
 
In order to view this Gospel as a story, let’s break down a story we all recognize as a story: Little Red Riding Hood.
*Sender*                        à                    *Object*             à                    *Receiver*
(Little Red’s Mother)                                (Basket of Food)                         (Grandmother)
 
                                                                          
                                                                          
 
            *Helper *                        à                    *Subject*            ß                    *Opponent*
      (Woodcutter)                                  (Red Ridding Hood)                        (Big Bad Wolf)
 
* *
Matthew has the same basic elements as this story:
 
            *Sender*                        à                    *Object*             à                    *Receiver*
(God)                                                (Salvation)                                     (Israel)
 
                                                                          
                                                                          
 
            *Helper s*                      à                    *Subject*            ß                    *Opponent*
          (Disciples)                                               (Jesus)                   (Satan & Leaders)
 
The story of Matthew then will have to do with the way God (the sender) accomplishes salvation (the object) for Israel (the recipient) through Jesus (the subject), who has been sent by God to deliver His people from their state of sin and exile.
Matthew draws a comparison between His followers and the Opposition in *ch**.
11-16:20*
* Like the Bad News Bears vs. the New York Yankees
* Looks hopeless and doesn’t get any better
* *16:22-23* Peter becomes part of the opposition
* *20:20-28 *Jockeying for position
* *26:8-9 *They try to rebuke the woman who anoints Jesus for His burial
* *26:36-46 *Unable to stay awake with Jesus in Gethsemane
* *26:39 *Ultimately their desertion of the one they have been called to follow
 
The disciples at this time provide Jesus with very little help and are even drawn into Satan’s role on two occasions.
* Peter
* Judas
 
During this time only on two occasions where they seen as successful
* *21:1-7* Fetching a donkey
* *26:17-19* Arranging for the Passover Meal
 
Yet we are moved by Jesus faith in them!
* *16:27-28* */Some will/* not taste death before they see the kingdom of God come
* *17:9* */They will/* tell others about the transfiguration
* *17:24-27* *They*, like Jesus, *are* sons of the kingdom
* *18:18-20* */They will/* have authority in the church to bind and to loose
* *19:28* */They will/* “sit on twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel.”
* *24:14* */They will/* be the ones that proclaim the Good News of the Kingdom throughout the world
 
Thus throughout this section we are given various indications that despite their weakness and failure, the disciples will eventually be cast into helping role after all
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9