The Word of God and the Spirit of God (Acts 16:1-10)
NEW STUDIES IN BIBLICAL THEOLOGY 27
Series editor: D. A. Carson
The acts of the risen Lord Jesus
LUKE’S ACCOUNT OF GOD’S UNFOLDING PLAN
Alan J. Thompson
Luke’s Gospel was written to provide assurance to Theophilus about the person and work of Jesus, that God’s purposes were accomplished through him, that Jesus’ suffering and death were anticipated in Scripture, and that Jesus brought about the inauguration of God’s kingdom, the fulfilment of God’s saving promises. The book of Acts, therefore, is about the continuation of those saving promises, the kingdom of God, through the Lord Jesus. Jesus is still the mediator of that kingdom, the one who administers those saving promises and the one who carries out God’s saving plan.
Luke’s statement in the first verse of Acts that his first book was about all that Jesus began to do and teach and therefore that his second book will be about what Jesus is continuing to do and teach is already a corrective to some popular approaches to Acts. Strictly speaking then the book is not primarily about the ‘Acts of the Apostles’. After Acts 1, of the twelve apostles named in 1:13 and 26, only the names of Peter and John appear again. Some have correctly noted the importance of the Holy Spirit in Acts and have suggested that the book should be called the ‘Acts of the Holy Spirit’. As important as the Holy Spirit is in Acts, it should be noted that even this designation does not quite capture the emphasis of Luke in Acts. Acts 1:1 indicates that the book is going to be about what Jesus is continuing to do and teach; therefore, the ‘Acts of the Risen Lord Jesus’ would be a better title. It must be said, though, that this could also be understood as a shorthand expression for something like ‘the Acts of the Lord Jesus, through his people, by the Holy Spirit, for the accomplishment of God’s purposes’!
The Acts of the Apostles was originally written as the second part of a two-volume work, and its inseparable relation to Luke’s Gospel must be kept in mind if we are to understand the work. As Cadbury insisted over fifty years ago: “Their unity is a fundamental and illuminating axiom.… They are not merely two independent writings from the same pen; they are a single continuous work. Acts is neither an appendix nor an afterthought. It is probably an integral part of the author’s original plan and purpose.”
The Prologue to the two-volume work (Luke 1:1–4) suggests, in fact, that the author’s intention was to write “an account of the things that have been fulfilled among us”—things that stretched from the birth of John the Baptist to the entrance of the Good News into Rome. And his use of the emphatic verb “began” (ērxato) as he commences his second volume (Acts 1:1) sets up the parallel between “all that Jesus began to do and to teach (italics mine)” as recorded in his Gospel and what he continued to do and to teach through his church as is shown in Acts.
(1) The Word of God Strengthens (16:1-5)
(2) The Spirit of God Guides (16:6-10)
The heightening of terminology in vv. 6–10 from “the Holy Spirit” to “the Spirit of Jesus” to “God” is not just stylistic but an unconscious expression of the early church’s embryonic trinitarian faith. All three terms refer to God by his Spirit giving direction to the mission. But just how the Holy Spirit revealed his will we are not told. Perhaps in one or more instances Silas had a part, for he was a prophet (15:32).