2018-02-25 Philippians 1:1 Greetings (2): Elders and Deacons
Notes
Transcript
GREETINGS (2): ELDERS AND DEACONS
(Philippians 1:1)
February 25, 2018
Acts 20; I Pet 5; I Tim 3, 5
Read Phil 1:1 – A guy went to visit a teacher friend who was upset. He had
seen a survey showing his state was 47th had a state academic ranking of 47th.
He said, “I just can’t believe it. We’re 47 out of 52!” It’s hard to criticize
students if teachers are deficient, isn’t it?! The same goes for the church. We
need leaders who know what they are about before God.
So Paul addresses this epistle “To all the saints in Christ Jesus who are at
Philippi, with the overseers and deacons.” This is the only epistle where Paul
mentions local leaders in the greeting, so it’s a good place to stop and
overview them briefly. The NT is not an organizational manual, but it models
two leadership offices – elder (overseer) and deacon – the 2 for whom Paul
give qualifications in I Tim 3 and Titus 1. So, who are they, what do they do?
I.
Elders
A. Make-Up (Who are they?)
1. Names – Ultimate leadership in the church belongs to one
Head -- Jesus Christ. But under His headship, the NT models leaders called
by 3 names – elders, overseers (KJV bishops) and pastors (shepherds). All 3
terms are used interchangeably to designate the same men. So in Acts 20:17
as Paul nears the end of his 3rd journey: “Now from Miletus he sent to
Ephesus and called the elders of the church to come to him.” But in Acts
20:28 he calls these same men overseers: “Pay careful attention to yourselves
and to all the flock, in which the Holy Spirit has made you overseers, to care
for (pastor) the church of God.” Same men, different title to designate them –
and their work is to pastor. So elders, overseers, pastors = same men!
In Titus 1:5b Titus is to “appoint elders in every town.” In Titus 1:7 he calls
the same men overseers! Elders and overseers are the same. Most telling is I
Pet 5:1-2a: “So I exhort the elders among you, as a fellow elder and a witness
of the sufferings of Christ, as well as a partaker in the glory that is going to be
revealed: 2 shepherd (pastor) the flock of God that is among you, exercising
oversight (verb form of overseer).” Here are all three titles applied to the
same men in the same text. So in the NT, local church leaders are sometimes
called pastors, sometimes elders, and sometimes overseers (bishop).
Why 3? Each title emphasizes a nuance of the position. Elder (πρεσβυτερος)
emphasizes maturity – not so much age as spiritual maturity – someone
1
experienced in the Word and in life. This is the overall qualification.
Overseer (επισκοπος) literally = “see over”. This is the function of the office
– to oversee church ministries under the headship of Christ. Pastor shows the
manner of oversight – like a loving shepherd caring for his sheep.
By the 2nd century, bishops began to be appointed over multiple churches. And
most denominations continue hierarchical practices to this day. But in the NT
we find only local leaders. Local congregations had great autonomy. This is
not to say other methods cannot work or do not have merit. The Bible does not
give specific instruction on organization. But it models simple leadership at
the local level under elders/overseers/pastors assisted by deacons.
2. Number – How many elders should a church have? It’s
never spelled out. But it is always more than one. I know this goes against
what many of you have believed; it’s not what you learned in business school,
but the NT models a plurality of elders. Even here, Paul addresses the
“overseers” (plural). Earlier, the church at Antioch collected relief funds for
the impoverished believers in Jerusalem. Acts 11:30: “And they did so
(collected funds), sending it to the elders (plural) by the hand of Barnabas and
Saul.” When churches developed on Paul’s first missionary journey: Acts
14:23: “And when they had appointed elders for them in every church.”
Paul told Titus to “appoint elders in every town” (1:5). On Paul’s 3rd journey
he “sent to Ephesus and called the elders of the church to come to him.” One
place, multiple elders. James advises anyone who is seriously ill to “call for
the elders (plural) of the church (singular)” (5:14b). So, in a local church,
under the headship of Christ, there is to be a multiplicity of elders, pastors,
overseers. The number depends on size, need and qualified candidates.
Now, the NT does have paid and unpaid elders. I Tim 5:17: “Let the elders
who rule well be considered worthy of double honor (pay, as the next vs.
clarifies), especially those who labor in preaching and teaching.” So a gifted
teaching pastor might be paid to free him to study. Other elders work secular
jobs, but still assume church leadership – much as we have in our own church.
So why a plurality of leaders? 1) All men are sinners and plurality provides a
check and balance system of accountability. 2) No one person knows the will
of God perfectly. Thus a plurality of men truly seeking the Lord’s will are
more likely to understand it. 3) Plurality removes the temptation of pride in
good times and depression in bad. No one man gets all the credit or all the
blame. 4) No one person has all God’s gifts. Multiple leaders provides greater
2
giftedness in leading a congregation. God’s pattern may not be the easiest, but
it’s always the best. Our elders have determined that based on Paul’s
admonition in I Cor 1:10c “but that you be united in the same mind and the
same judgment,” that we will make no decision unless we are unanimous.
3. Nature – So, what kind of men are these to be? The Bible
leaves no doubt about that. In both I Tim 3 and Titus 1, Paul lists
qualifications; they are intimidating. I Tim 3:2 Therefore an overseer must be
• above reproach -- literally not able to be blamed. Not perfect. Paul was
a murderer. But a blameless quality of life over a few years.
• the husband of one wife -- literally a “one-woman man”. Some feel
never divorced. But you could have a never divorced guy who ogles every
woman who walks by. This is a man who over time, divorced or not and
remarried or not, has demonstrated his devotion to one woman.
• sober-minded -- cool in crisis, clear-thinking. Doesn’t lose his head.
• self-controlled – Prioritizes life from God’s perspective, not man’s.
• respectable –Not given to excesses. Behavior is commendable.
• hospitable – literally “lover of strangers”. One who shares with others.
• able to teach – not pro, nor even one with gift of teaching. But one
who can articulate the essentials of the faith. One who values teaching.
• 3 not a drunkard – literally, not lingering alongside wine. Not a
teetotaler, but someone who avoids 2nd or 3rd glass that removes inhibitions.
• not violent but gentle – self-controlled. Not defensive of one’s rights.
• not quarrelsome – Not contentious. Someone who has to “win.”
• Not a lover of money – not driven by material goals.
• 4 He must manage his own household well, with all dignity keeping
his children submissive, 5 for if someone does not know how to manage his
own household, how will he care for God’s church? – Work is not the
standard. Home is. Acid test. Is this man involved with family? Leading at
home by precept and example! Teaches kids. Prays with kids. Doesn’t
delegate it all.
• 6 He must not be a recent convert, or he may become puffed up with
conceit and fall into the condemnation of the devil – Someone with
demonstrated spiritual maturity. Paul was a number of years before leading.
• 7 Moreover, he must be well thought of by outsiders, so that he may
not fall into disgrace, into a snare of the devil. – Can he pass a credit check?
Known for honesty and integrity? Get along with people? Keep promises?
3
So – what a list, huh? If there is any man here saying, “Hey, that’s me!” you
probably don’t qualify. None of us can say we’ve arrived, right? But this is the
goal for every godly man – elder or not. And while we won’t get perfection in
our leaders, we must take these qualifications seriously.
Billy Graham modeled this so well. Amidst the scandals of other celebrity
preachers, he stands out. Finances: He provided audited accounts of every
crusade in the local papers as soon as the crusade was finished. He always
took a straight salary equivalent to a senior pastor, no matter how much
money his meetings brought in. He was never alone with a woman other than
Ruth. He worked at these qualifications – in his heart and in his behavior.
B. Mission (What do they do?)
1. Feed – Feed what? The Word of God. An elder’s primary
burden should be to get God’s message into himself and into others. Three
times Jesus told Peter in Jn 21, “Feed my sheep.” Why do people live such
shabby, undisciplined, unhappy lives? Because they don’t know and obey the
word. Hosea 4:6: “My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge.” Elders
are to insure that doesn’t happen on their watch. “Feed = teach!
Physical food distribution in the early church became very time-consuming.
So the apostles asked the people to appoint Spirit-filled men to do that. Why?
Acts 6:2b: “It is not right that we should give up preaching the word of God
to serve tables.” In Acts 20:20 at Paul’s last meeting with the elders from
Ephesus, he reminds them how he was “teaching you in public and from
house to house.” They are to follow his example.
The church is a teaching station, equipping saints to live godly lives in a world
gone mad. Paul instructs in Titus 2:1: “But as for you, teach what accords
with sound doctrine.” I Tim 4:16 (on my wall as a reminder): “Keep a close
watch on yourself and on the teaching. Persist in this, for by so doing you will
save both yourself and your hearers.” I Tim 6:2c: “Teach and urge these
things.” What things? The Word of God. II Tim 2:2: “and what you have
heard from me in the presence of many witnesses entrust to faithful men who
will be able to teach others also.” II Tim 2:15-16: “ Do your best to present
yourself to God as one approved, a worker who has no need to be ashamed,
rightly handling the word of truth. 16 But avoid irreverent babble, for it will
lead people into more and more ungodliness.” Teach the Word – not your
opinions. It’s all that matters. On Paul’s way out the door to be executed?
4
“Preach the Word” (II Tim 4:2). Do what? Preach. Preach what? The Word.
Not your opinion, not current events, not political fads. Preach the Word.
I Tim 5:17: Teaching elders as those who: “labor in preaching and teaching.”
Labor – toil. Used of a farmer in his field. The Spirit inspires those who put in
the work. My primary job is not to administer or fund raise or counsel or visit.
All those are necessary. But job 1 is to labor teaching and preaching. That’s a
several hour a day job, and elders are to insure that it is happening.
Many years ago there was a conference where a number of pastors of large
churches were on a panel and were asked, “How do you study?” The first said,
“Well, I read my Bible every day.” Another said, “I always read a good
sermon every week.” Another – “I’m too busy to study. I trust the HS to lead
me.” John MacArthur said, “I must be weird, but I have to study 5 or 6 hours
every day to be ready to feed God’s people.” His ministry has stood the test of
time. His priorities were set by God, not by his desires or even those of his
congregation. Feed my sheep. Teach my people. That’s the Lord’s instruction.
2. Lead – Next, elders are to lead – spiritually. Yes, there
are business issues, but this is servant leadership that serves the congregation
by praying for them, teaching them, urging obedience, protecting them from
false teaching, helping them find their giftedness and ministry, and providing
means of outreach. In short – helping people know, grow and go. We’re not
here to copy someone else’s plan, but by the HS determine what our Head,
Jesus, wants to do uniquely in this place at this time thru this congregation.
This leadership is to be accomplished primarily – by example. Notice Paul
didn’t address the saints at Philippi as under the overseers and deacons but
with them. Eample. I Tim 4:12: “Let no one despise you for your youth, but
set the believers an example in speech, in conduct, in love, in faith, in purity.”
You lead; mine will follow. I Pet 5:3 requires the same thing of elders: “not
domineering over those in your charge, but being examples to the flock.”
The entry in John Wesley’s diary dated 31 March, 1731 says, “In the evening
I met Mr. Whitfield in Bristol. I could scarce reconcile myself at first to this
preaching in the fields, of which he set me an example; having been all my
life (until very lately) so tenacious of every point of decency and order, that I
should have thought the saving of souls almost a sin, if it had not been done
in the church." Wesley, became one of the greatest open-air preachers who
ever lived. But he needed an example. And so elders are to be examples in
5
speech, conduct, love, faith and purity, praying that someone else will come
along and be even greater in those things as a result. That’s leadership.
II.
Deacons
Well, we’re out of time to consider deacons in detail. But who are they? Acts
6 gives the example. They attend to the physical and pastoral care matters to
free elders for the work of prayer and ministry of the Word. But check their
qualifications in I Tim 3:8-10. They are virtually the same as those of elders
with the exception of “apt to teach.” They are also spiritual people, devoted to
helping ministries – keeping things purring in the background so that the
ministries of the church can go forward with order and decorum.
Conc -- So does the congregation have any responsibility here? Of course.
Heb 13:17: “Obey your leaders and submit to them, for they are keeping
watch over your souls, as those who will have to give an account. Let them do
this with joy and not with groaning, for that would be of no advantage to you.”
Overseers are ultimately responsible, not to the congregation, but to God.
That’s who they’ll give account to. So, the people, having expressed their
opinions, are to obey. “Even when I don’t agree?” Of course. The instruction
is meaningless if applied only to when you agree. Christian unity isn’t always
agreeing; it’s always being agreeable and submissive to leadership, short of
a problem of immorality or heresy. I am deeply grateful for the unity we
enjoy; but the Enemy would love to disrupt it.
Dr. Emerson Eggerichs reports that at one of the “Love and Respect”
Conferences he and his wife conduct, they held a Q&A session on “The
Husband’s Authority in the Home.” One young wife made this unwittingly
revealing comment: “I want my husband to be the head; I want him to be the
leader. I just want to make sure that he makes decisions in keeping with
what I want.” That could easily be our response to church leadership as well.
Better to have our say, and then to take our Lord’s advice: “Obey your leaders
and submit to them . . . as those who will have to give an account. Let them do
this with joy.” They will give account to God for their leadership. But we
will give account for our followship. Let’s pray.
6