Resolved
FEELS IMPOSSIBLE::MISSION IMPOSSIBLE
STEALING BEVO
DROP ANCHOR
STEAL - KILL - DESTROY
Removed from Jerusalem for specific training
Learn their language and religion
New Names & Possible castration
RESOLVED - WHY THE FOOD AND WINE?
OUR RESOLVE DISPLAYS GOD
Daniel teaches us that the struggle is not to make the culture Christian, but how a Christian can live in a hostile culture.
the principle of continuity will drive us to ask ourselves where God is calling on us to make a stand of faith in the midst of our constantly changing culture, a prospect frightening as well as exciting.
But no matter what their political orientation, whether conservative or liberal, Christians will find themselves at odds with the values and beliefs of the broader culture just by virtue of their ultimate allegiance to a God who is bigger than themselves.
Daniel endured much cultural assimilation, yet he knew where it was appropriate for him to draw the line of distinction. The text implies that Daniel acted in a right manner for his situation. The narrative applauds his growth in wisdom. Not only that, but as we will see in the following chapters, Daniel also had wonderful opportunities to make even bolder statements of his faith.
Once again, Daniel is not given to us as a model of the one biblical way for the believer to interact with his or her culture. Rather, when viewed in the light of the rest of Scripture, Daniel imparts the liberating, yet frightening news that there are multiple ways to be a believer in an unbelieving world. Much depends on the person and his or her specific cultural situation.
(1) Jesus spoke a paradox when he taught that though we are “in the world” (John 17:11, 15), we are, like him, not “of it” (17:14, 16). Indeed, Jesus is the one who has sent us into the world (17:18) with the purpose that the world “may believe that you have sent me” (17:21). To use another biblical image of our involvement with the present world, we are “resident aliens” (cf. Phil. 3:20).
But notice the leeway provided in Jesus’ statement. It is a general principle that can be lived out in a variety of ways. What does it mean, to take a concrete example, in the area of the education of our children? All of us who have had children have struggled with the decision of how best to educate them. Schools have a huge impact on the development of our children’s thinking and life direction, and there are many who will tell you that there is one, and only one, correct answer to that question. Some will say that a Christian school is the only proper choice. We want our children not only to avoid the thinking of secular humanism found in the public school system, but also to construct a positive, biblically centered understanding of the world.
Others, some because of the lack of a Christian school option and others because they believe even the Christian schools have imbibed the spirit of the age, advocate home-schooling. Occasionally a brave soul will even suggest that the public school, with all of its potential pitfalls, is the only way to go to prevent the “ghettoization” of the church, and prepare our children for “life in the real world.”
Looking at this question in the light of Christ’s admonition to be “in the world, but not of it” and with an eye on Daniel’s success in a truly pagan educational environment does not allow us to answer this question with dogmatism. There is no single answer to this question for all people of faith at every stage of a child’s development. Too much depends on the child, the school system, the parents, the church, and so much more. We can be “in the world, but not of it” in the local public school, the Christian school, or the home school.
How many of us wish that the answer was simple and clear-cut, not only in this issue but in all the issues of faith and culture that bombard us daily. What movies and television shows are appropriate for me to watch? What magazines can I read? What music can I listen to? How protective of my children should I be?
(2) But this does not mean we withdraw from a dangerous and hostile world. In Matthew 10:16 Jesus calls his disciples “sheep” and the rest of the world “wolves,” but he demands courage from his sheep to take the risk to live among the wolves. In the process, he gives them a strategy, using two more animal metaphors: “Therefore be as shrewd as snakes and as innocent as doves.” We are to be innocent and shrewd as we live out the issues of faith in our culture. And does this not describe Daniel perfectly? Daniel certainly was innocent. He mounted no angry assault on his captors; rather, he acted quite civilly.67 He was virtually serpent-like in his crafty strategy to remain faithful in a land antithetical to his deeply held faith. As the story continues, we will observe that Daniel not only remained faithful but exercised significant influence on the godless world around him.68
