Bibliology Session 17-Preservation
Notes
Transcript
Biblical Preservation
Elements of Bibliology
1.Revelation: From the mind of God to the Mind of the
Human Author.
2.Inspiration: From the Mind of the Human Author to
the Document.
3.Canonicity: Which Documents are, or are not from
God? Is the Bible Complete?
4.Preservation: From the original Documents down
through the centuries to the present.
5.Translation: From the languages of the original
Documents to the language of the reader.
6.Interpretation & Illumination: From the
Document to the mind of the reader.
7.Application / Animation: From the mind of the
reader to the life of the reader.
Goals Tonight
I.
Look at the Issues Facing
the Doctrine of
Preservation
II.
Defend the Doctrine of
Preservation
The Issues Facing Us
I.
God inspired every word of the
original autographs (Greek word
meaning “self-written” referring
to the original documents)
A. These autographs were written
on papyrus, which is made out
of the papyrus reed that grows
on the river Nile. The pages
were glued together and laid
out in long scrolls.
The Issues Facing Us
B. Papyrus is susceptible to
rotting when exposed to
moisture, which
necessitated copies to be
made.
C. Parchment (made of animal
skins) did not become the
wide spread writing material
until the 4th century A.D.
II.
The Issues Facing Us
All of these original autographs
have disappeared.
A. Though many copies were
made, they were all handcopied.
B. Therefore ALL copies contain
scribal errors.
C. No two existing manuscripts
agree in every detail, and all
contain some scribal error.
The Issues Facing Us
III. Additionally, your Bible
is a translation from
these manuscripts. The
manuscripts were all
copied in Greek &
Hebrew (the original
languages). Your Bible is
a translation of a copy of
a copy of a copy…
Arguments Against Preservation
I.
The Bible CANNOT be
II.
No two manuscripts
trusted! It is too old!
agree, so we have no idea
what they originally said!
III. No translation is perfect,
and because they do not
completely agree why try?
Defending
Preservation
1. Preservation was
Promised By God
2. Preservation is
Supported by History
Preservation was Promised by God
Psalm 12:6-7 “The words of the
LORD are pure words: as silver
tried in a furnace of earth, purified
seven times. Thou shalt keep them,
O LORD, thou shalt preserve them
form this generation forever.”
Isaiah 40:8 “The grass withers, the
flower fades, but the word of our
God shall stand forever.”
Preservation was Promised by God
Matthew 24:35 “Heaven and earth
shall pass away, but my words shall
not pass away.”
1 Peter 1:25 “But the word of the
Lord endures forever, and this is
the word which by the gospel is
preached unto you.”
Preservation is Supported by
History
I.
Defense of O.T.
Preservation
II.
Defense of N.T.
Preservation
Issue of O.T. Preservation
I.
Age of the Masoretic Text:
A. The Hebrew Masoretic text is the
most widely used text for the O.T.
B. Yet the oldest manuscript of this
text we possess dates to circa 930
A.D., which is nearly 1300 years
later than the originals.
C. So manuscript evidence for the
O.T. was hailed as too young to
be reliable.
Issue of O.T. Preservation
II.
Disagreement with External Sources
A. Not only is the Masoretic text
considered “young,” it also
conflicts with other known sources.
B. The Samaritan Pentateuch (circa
4-5th centuries B.C.), and the
Greek Septuagint (circa 250 B.C.)
have enough conflicts with the
Masoretic that critics say none of
them can be trusted.
Confidence in O.T. Preservation
I.
The Approval of Jesus
A. Christ seems to have quoted
from both Masoretic Text &
Septuagint, calling them both
Scripture.
B. This indicates not only that
they can both be trusted, but
that the differences between
them are not significant enough
to merit concern.
Confidence in O.T. Preservation
II.
Method of the Scribes
A. Jewish Tradition regarded Ezra and the
school of scribes he started (a.k.a. the
“Sopherim” later known as “Masorites”)
as the guardians of the text of Scripture
B. This school of Scribes developed an
elaborate system of tests to ensure the
accuracy of their copying.
1.
Noting in the margin words that only
occur once.
2.
Kept track of the numbers of individual
letters and words in each book.
Confidence in O.T. Preservation
3.
They would record the middle
word and letter of each book,
and even how many times
each letter occurred within
the book.
4. If a copy did not pass these
tests, and they could not find
the mistake to correct it, they
would destroy the copy and
start over!
Confidence in O.T. Preservation
III. Evidence from the Dead Sea Scrolls
A. In Nov.-Dec. 1946 the discovery was
made. Three Bedouin shepherds
exploring caves discovered several large
earthen jars, one of which contained
three leather scrolls. One was the Isaiah
Scroll, which dated back to 100 B.C.
B. Later, these were sold and discovered
for their worth. Since then tens of
thousands of fragments from hundreds
of manuscripts have been discovered in
various caves around the Dead Sea.
Confidence in O.T. Preservation
C. Part or all of every book of the O.T.
except Esther has been found.
D. The greatest thing is that these texts
are almost identical to the traditional
text we have, agreeing 95%. The other
5% is misspellings, and have no bearing
on the meaning.
E. Now we have physical proof
demonstrating that the Hebrew text
used in Jesus’ day, which He
authenticated, agrees with the text we
use today!
Defense of N.T.
Preservation
1. Sources of Manuscripts
2. Number of Manuscripts
3. Date of Manuscripts
4. Criticism against Manuscripts
5. Agreement of Manuscripts
Sources for N.T. Manuscripts
I.
After the originals were written, many copies
II.
When persecution rose & these copies were
were made and spread around.
threatened, believers heroically preserved
them until after the “Edict of Toleration”
when persecution subsided.
III. Europeans later rediscovered Greek
manuscripts after the fall of Constantinople,
eventually resulting in both the Renaissance
& the Reformation in Europe.
IV. The study of these many manuscripts led to
the emergence of three major manuscript
“families.”
Sources for N.T. Manuscripts
I.
The Byzantine family of Texts
were produced in the old
Byzantine empire, which still used
Greek while the western part of
the empire had switched to Latin.
These texts eventually
concentrated in Constantinople.
• Characteristics: This family
makes up the majority of
manuscripts, high level of
agreement between them, but
not as old as the Alexandrian.
Sources for N.T. Manuscripts
II.
The Western family of texts originated
in Italy, Gaul, and North Africa.
• These manuscripts are “full of
expansions, deletions, harmonizations,
and even theological alterations” that
appear to be the result of hurried
evangelistic zeal rather than sloppy
scribal practice. Translated into Latin
early in the transmission process, the
Western text was very influential in
Latin-speaking Europe and the Roman
church.
Sources for N.T. Manuscripts
III. The Alexandrian family
of Texts originated in
Alexandria, Egypt.
• Characteristics: Fewer in
number, less agreement
between themselves, yet
are older than the
Byzantine texts.
Number of N.T. Manuscripts
The Number of manuscripts for the Greek N.T.,
though a source of attack by Bible critics, is actually
a great help for Christians.
Theologian Henry Thiessen points out, “When we
recall that only a very small percentage of books
survive more than a quarter of a century; that a much
smaller percentage lasts for a century; and that only
a very small number live a thousand years; we at once
realize that the Bible is a unique book.”
Number of N.T. Manuscripts
- 5 copies currently exist of Aristotle’s writings & 9 of Plato, yet
they were born 1,000 years after Moses, whose writings exist in
great numbers.
- 8 copies of the Histories of Herodotus.
- 10 copies currently exist of Julius Caesar’s “Gaulic Wars,” yet the
copies we possess were written 1,000 years after the originals.
- 647 copies currently exist of Homer’s works yet they were made
1,300 years after the originals.
- 20 Copies of the History of Rome by Tacitus, or 19 copies of
Livy’s History of Rome.
Number of N.T. Manuscripts
- The New Testament alone has nearly 6,000 Greek manuscripts
in existence, some of which date to within 35 years of the
originals.
- Plus 10,000 manuscripts of the Latin Vulgate.
- 9,300 manuscripts of other early versions whether Ethiopian,
Slavic, Armenian, Arabic, etc.
- Total manuscript evidence is somewhere around 25,000, not
including quotations from early church fathers, which would
grant many more.
Speaking of the quotations from the early
church fathers, Harold Greenlee says, “These
quotations are so extensive that the New
Testament could virtually be reconstructed from
them without the use of the New Testament
Manuscripts.”
Date of N.T. Manuscripts
I.
Though late date was one of the
primary charges against the
Masoretic text until the DSS were
found, the N.T. manuscripts we
posses are much closer to the date
of the original writings.
II. The oldest known manuscript,
containing a small portion of John 18,
was copied perhaps as soon as 25
years after John’s death, while older
manuscripts may yet be discovered.
Criticisms against Preservation
I.
Because all copies were hand made,
the N.T. manuscripts we posses
contain 400,000 variants (i.e.
scribal errors).
II.
Yet the N.T. itself has only about
138,000 words.
III. Therefore nearly 3 variants exists for
every one word of the original text.
IV. Therefore the N.T. CANNOT be
Trusted!
I.
What they Don’t Tell You
99% of all variants have no
impact on the meaning of the
text because they consist of
either…
A. Word Order
B. The Presence or Absence of
an Article
C. Misspellings that do not
change the word
What they Don’t Tell You
II.
Only 4,000 meaningful variants
remain.
A. Of these 4,000, half of them are
corrected by looking at the
majority of manuscripts, leaving
only 2,000 variants, approximately
one variant every 3 pages.
B. In fact the Greek N.T. is
approximately 250 pages, and all
of these 2,000 variants could fit on
1/2 of 1 page.
What they Don’t Tell You
III. None of these existing variants
impact any major area of
Theology.
A. Though 1/2 a page of variants
do exist, the Bible diffuses its
teaching equally throughout
its pages.
B. Therefore ultimately no area
of Theology is disturbed. So
have confidence in your Bible!
I.
Perspective on Variants
The presence of variants
in the N.T. manuscripts
actually helps us argue for
accuracy.
II. The presence of these
variants argues against
allegations of purposeful
corruption of the texts by
a central authority.
Perspective on Variants
III. Contrast the Koran,
which about 20 years
after the death of
Mohammed was
centralized under the 3rd
Calif and revised. After
this revision, all former
manuscripts were
burned.
Perspective on Variants
IV. So while Muslims must put all
their confidence of
manuscript transmission in
one man, Christians have
thousands of sources from
dozens of geographical
locations upon which to
draw. Therefore Christians
can have the greater
confidence in our Scriptures.