Untitled Sermon
Test
Although studies in this volume could well be considered under the rubric of “reception,” I suggest that “trajectory” might better catch the reality. The dictionary defines trajectory as the path of a moving body. We can take it here as almost a synonym for development, that is, for shifts or changes that have taken place that probably would not have done so except for the council but that cannot easily be traced to a specific provision of the council. Whereas “reception” generally indicates a direct application (or nonapplication) of explicit norms or directives, such as the revised liturgical forms, “trajectory” suggests something less obviously based on the council’s norms and directives. It is related to reception, and perhaps can be considered a species of it. Introduction of it as a category of interpretation expands what we usually mean by reception.
Although studies in this volume could well be considered under the rubric of “reception,” I suggest that “trajectory” might better catch the reality. The dictionary defines trajectory as the path of a moving body. We can take it here as almost a synonym for development, that is, for shifts or changes that have taken place that probably would not have done so except for the council but that cannot easily be traced to a specific provision of the council. Whereas “reception” generally indicates a direct application (or nonapplication) of explicit norms or directives, such as the revised liturgical forms, “trajectory” suggests something less obviously based on the council’s norms and directives. It is related to reception, and perhaps can be considered a species of it. Introduction of it as a category of interpretation expands what we usually mean by reception.
Although studies in this volume could well be considered under the rubric of “reception,” I suggest that “trajectory” might better catch the reality. The dictionary defines trajectory as the path of a moving body. We can take it here as almost a synonym for development, that is, for shifts or changes that have taken place that probably would not have done so except for the council but that cannot easily be traced to a specific provision of the council. Whereas “reception” generally indicates a direct application (or nonapplication) of explicit norms or directives, such as the revised liturgical forms, “trajectory” suggests something less obviously based on the council’s norms and directives. It is related to reception, and perhaps can be considered a species of it. Introduction of it as a category of interpretation expands what we usually mean by reception.
Although studies in this volume could well be considered under the rubric of “reception,” I suggest that “trajectory” might better catch the reality. The dictionary defines trajectory as the path of a moving body. We can take it here as almost a synonym for development, that is, for shifts or changes that have taken place that probably would not have done so except for the council but that cannot easily be traced to a specific provision of the council. Whereas “reception” generally indicates a direct application (or nonapplication) of explicit norms or directives, such as the revised liturgical forms, “trajectory” suggests something less obviously based on the council’s norms and directives. It is related to reception, and perhaps can be considered a species of it. Introduction of it as a category of interpretation expands what we usually mean by reception.
Although studies in this volume could well be considered under the rubric of “reception,” I suggest that “trajectory” might better catch the reality. The dictionary defines trajectory as the path of a moving body. We can take it here as almost a synonym for development, that is, for shifts or changes that have taken place that probably would not have done so except for the council but that cannot easily be traced to a specific provision of the council. Whereas “reception” generally indicates a direct application (or nonapplication) of explicit norms or directives, such as the revised liturgical forms, “trajectory” suggests something less obviously based on the council’s norms and directives. It is related to reception, and perhaps can be considered a species of it. Introduction of it as a category of interpretation expands what we usually mean by reception.
Although studies in this volume could well be considered under the rubric of “reception,” I suggest that “trajectory” might better catch the reality. The dictionary defines trajectory as the path of a moving body. We can take it here as almost a synonym for development, that is, for shifts or changes that have taken place that probably would not have done so except for the council but that cannot easily be traced to a specific provision of the council. Whereas “reception” generally indicates a direct application (or nonapplication) of explicit norms or directives, such as the revised liturgical forms, “trajectory” suggests something less obviously based on the council’s norms and directives. It is related to reception, and perhaps can be considered a species of it. Introduction of it as a category of interpretation expands what we usually mean by reception.
