Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.5LIKELY
Disgust
0.46UNLIKELY
Fear
0.15UNLIKELY
Joy
0.11UNLIKELY
Sadness
0.53LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.14UNLIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.43UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.98LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.39UNLIKELY
Extraversion
0.09UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.25UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.51LIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
| *September~/October 2001* |
| | ----
!! The Battle Over Hell
by Keith W. Stump----
| The words, large and in quotes, were intended as an alternate title for the painting.
They were chilling in their impact: "The Case Against Christianity."
|
----
*I*t was my first visit to the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York City.
I was standing before The Last Judgment, a painting by the 15th-century Dutch artist Jan van Eyck.
On the floor, directly in front of the painting, lay a sheet of paper bearing a few hastily written words.
An earlier visitor had placed it there, and it had not yet been removed by museum personnel.
The words, large and in quotes, were intended as an alternate title for the painting.
They were chilling in their impact: "The Case Against Christianity."
They stopped me cold.
What had prompted the visitor to level such a charge?
I took a closer look at the painting.
At the top of the canvas, in heaven, sits an impassive Jesus, surrounded by a host of angels and an adoring multitude of the saved.
At the bottom, in hell, is a writhing mass of the damned, suffering brutal torture at the hands of hideous demons.
The contrast between the rather prim majesty of heaven and the harrowing nightmare of hell is striking.
And -- as the note-writing visitor had intended -- it poignantly frames an age-old question:
How can the concept of eternal suffering in hell be reconciled with a God of mercy and love?
For many, this is indeed a case against Christianity.
They want nothing to do with a Christian God who could sit back and watch his children roast for eternity in a subterranean chamber of horrors.
A deity of such cruelty and vindictiveness, they feel, could not be the true God.
*Hot Debate*
Non-Christians are not the only ones who have problems with the idea of hell.
Hell is one of the hottest debates within the Christian community today.
Most Christians believe in hell as the fate of those who reject God.
But one Christian's idea of hell may not be another's.
----
| It took the Christian community hundreds of years to come up with a consensus on the issue.
The majority view -- that hell is a place of eternal fiery torment -- emerged only after a long debate within the Church.
|
----
While most Christians agree that the essence of hell is separation from God, the in-house debate is over the specifics -- where hell is, when it is, how hot it is and how long it is.
Why?
Because the Bible offers little detail.
Hell is a doctrine about which there is no clear and dogmatic teaching in Scripture.
The interpretation of biblical statements and the imagery they employ is beset with difficulties.
As hell appears to be a harsh doctrine, many Christians today choose to explain it in ways that soften its impact.
The modern trend has been to replace the traditional fire-and-brimstone concept of hell as a place of eternal torture with a more politically correct portrayal of hell as a condition of spiritual anguish caused by separation from God.
In other words, hell is not a /place/ but a /state./
Polls reveal that while nearly two-thirds of Americans believe there is a hell, the majority of them think of it as a state of existence or a condition rather than a literal blazing underworld.
Likewise, growing numbers of Christian scholars are speaking out against what they regard as the folly of relying on purely literalist readings of scriptural statements about the sufferings of the damned.
They object to interpretive methods that fail to recognize the textual context, the literary genre of the passages, their historical setting and the broader theological context of Christ's saving work and God's love for humanity.
Conservatives, on the other hand, denounce as revisionists those who advocate a more figurative view of hell.
In /watering down/ the /reality/ of painful retribution in an eternal fiery hell, these liberals are undermining an important biblical doctrine, conservatives believe.
*Not a Core Doctrine*
Though some portray the issue of hell as central, history tells another story.
The doctrine of hell evolved long after the core doctrines of the historic Christian faith were established.
The views of the early Church fathers about hell were far from unanimous.
It took the Christian community hundreds of years to come up with a consensus on the issue.
The majority view -- that hell is a place of eternal fiery torment -- emerged only after a long debate within the Church.
By the Middle Ages, the concept of a fiery underworld had become a dominant element in people's minds.
To the medieval faithful, hell was a place of suffering and despair, of wretchedness and excruciating pain.
The medieval Church used fire-and-brimstone rhetoric to its fullest to keep believers under control.
The Church considered hell a useful prod to piety, a strong incentive to refrain from evil.
*/The Inferno/*
Though criticism was raised by some churchmen against the overdramatization of hell, the brutal imagery of medieval theology tended toward ever-more-vivid portrayals of hell's horrors.
And nowhere were those horrors so dramatically depicted as in /The Inferno,/ the first part of /The Divine Comedy,/ an epic poem by the Italian author Dante Alighieri (1265-1321).
/The Inferno/ records Dante's imaginary travels among the damned.
His purpose was to warn his readers that reward or punishment would surely meet them hereafter.
According to Dante, hell is divided into nine rings or circles, descending conically into the earth.
Within this multi-leveled chamber of horrors, souls suffer punishments appropriate to their sins.
Gluttons, for example, are doomed to forever lie like pigs in a foul-smelling sty under a cold, eternal rain of filth and refuse.
The lustful -- driven by their passions during this lifetime -- are forever whirled about in a dark, stormy wind.
Although the fruit of Dante's fertile imagination, /The Inferno/ is generally in keeping with the theology of his age.
His picture of hell as a gigantic concentration camp -- a nightmarish place of eternal torment presided over by Satan -- became fixed in the popular imagination.
It continues to represent the thinking of some Christians to this day -- and of some critics of Christianity who mistakenly assume that Dante's frightful imagery comes from the Bible.
*Differing Views*
If Dante's portrayal of the infernal regions is overstated, what do the Scriptures say about hell?
Anyone embarking on a study of the subject is confronted with a library of conflicting literature, daunting in its size.
To further complicate matters, many of these diverse works are cogently argued, and seem to present compelling scriptural evidence.
That should tell us something.
In the absence of a fully developed teaching in the New Testament, the fair-minded Christian should regard these competing views as worthy of investigation.
Even if one ultimately disagrees with most of them, the study cannot fail to place the issue into clearer perspective.
A willingness to set aside our presuppositions -- our denominational baggage -- and carefully and prayerfully examine the merits of the arguments will add both to our understanding of the Bible and to our confidence in God's justice and mercy.
Here, in brief summary, are today's principal points of view on hell, though within each are variations beyond the scope of this article.
(See Recommended Reading, page 14.)
*· A Blazing Underworld.*
In this view, as previously described, hell is an actual place smoke and flames, where the souls of the damned suffer unending fiery torment.
This view is based on a literal reading of scriptures that characterize hell as "unquenchable fire" (Matthew 3:12), "the fiery furnace" (Matthew 13:42), "eternal fire" (Matthew 18:8), "eternal punishment" (Matthew 25:46) and similar descriptions.
*· A Condition of Eternal Separation.*
This metaphorical view also envisions eternal conscious punishment, but not in actual flames.
Rather, the sufferings of the damned are translated into spiritualized terms.
Hell is not an abode but a /condition -- a furnace of affliction,/ so to speak, not a furnace of real flames.
The Bible uses symbolical language.
According to this view of hell, fire is an image that is used figuratively, as a symbol of the pain of deprivation, the agony of hopelessness, the torment and despair of spending eternity without God.
The punishment of the wicked is the pain of knowing that they will never see God.
Advocates of this view explain that the fate of the damned is called outer darkness (Matthew 8:12) because those in that condition will never see the light of God.
They will be trapped in blackness forever, exiled to the private hell of their own thoughts, isolated in a place they have created for themselves in their own darkened minds.
It will be their free choice to live apart from God.
*· A Place of Temporary Punishment.*
This view envisions hell as punishment, but not necessarily forever.
Hell is indeed real, but one's stay in it does not have to be eternal.
Proponents of this concept acknowledge that divine justice requires some sort of punishment for evil.
But they argue that infinite punishment would be appropriate only for infinite evil.
What kind of God, they ask, would repay a few decades of sin with an eternity of torture?
The sufferings of hell are therefore remedial, they reason.
Even the worst sinners can be rehabilitated and ultimately find their way to heaven, though some few will persist in rebellion and choose to remain forever separate from God.
This view bears a resemblance to the Roman Catholic concept of purgatory, the reputed destination of believers who die in sin, where they are purified by suffering before being admitted to heaven.
It differs, however, in that it sees even those who were unbelievers during their lifetimes as eventually making their way into heaven.
*· Annihilationism.*
This view asserts that the fate of sinners is not endless suffering but rather complete and utter destruction.
The souls of the wicked will not endure eternal punishment in hell but will be completely annihilated after the Last Judgment.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9