Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.45UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.45UNLIKELY
Fear
0.16UNLIKELY
Joy
0.2UNLIKELY
Sadness
0.45UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0UNLIKELY
Confident
0.17UNLIKELY
Tentative
0UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.94LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.87LIKELY
Extraversion
0.09UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.75LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.79LIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
*30* What shall we say, then?
/s/That Gentiles who did not pursue righteousness have attained it, that is, /t/a righteousness that is by faith; *31* but that Israel /u/who pursued a law that would lead to righteousness/4/ /v/did not succeed in reaching that law.
*32* Why?
Because they did not pursue it by faith, but as if it were based on works.
They have stumbled over the /w/stumbling stone, *33* as it is written,
/x/“Behold, I am laying in Zion /y/a stone of stumbling, and a rock of offense;
and whoever believes in him will not be /a/put to shame.”
Situation summary: The ?
(30-31)
The Gain of the Gentiles.
The Failure of the Jew.
Spiritual sidetrack: the digression of God’s people (32a)
Stumbling Stone: the rejection of God’s Son (32b-33)
/What kind of Jesus did the Jews want?/
/What kind of Jesus do people want today?/
\\ ----
/s /[ch.
10:20]
/t /ch.
1:17; 3:21, 22; 10:6; Gal.
2:16; 3:24; Phil.
3:9; Heb.
11:7
/u /[ch.
10:2, 3; 11:7]
/4 /Greek /a law of righteousness/
/v /[Gal.
5:4]
/w /See 1 Pet.
2:8
/x /1 Pet.
2:6, 7; Cited from Isa. 28:16; [Ps.
118:22]
/y /Isa.
8:14
/a /Isa.
49:23; Joel 2:26, 27
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9