Final Warnings Part 2
The Fall of Babylon
One popular view concerning the identity of “Babylon” is that it is a code word for Rome, which the Christians used to disguise references to Rome. That use occurs elsewhere in the New Testament (cf. 1 Pet. 5:13). The other view is that “Babylon” is literal Babylon on the Euphrates River. The second option is better in Revelation because in this book place names describe literal locations (cf. 1:9; 2:1, 8, 12, 18; 3:1, 7, 14) unless specifically identified as figurative (e.g., 11:8). Furthermore “the great,” Nebuchadnezzar’s description of Babylon (cf. Dan. 4:30), always modifies the literal Babylon in Revelation. Viewing this place as literal Babylon does not exclude further implications of the religious and political systems that have arisen from the city, which become the focus of the revelation later (chs. 17, 18).473 “Babylon” will epitomize ungodliness in the world during the Tribulation, as it has throughout human history since the tower of Babel (Gen. 11:1–9). Like “Hollywood” the name represents the world system as well as being the name of a particular city.