Urgency pt3
People who hear from God do not have the option of silence. We must decide whether we will obey Jesus or our own desires.
he criticized the Pharisees for holding the Sabbath laws and traditions so rigidly that people became servants of the Sabbath
They are, rather, motivated “to accuse Jesus.” Markan irony is again present: the authorities deny Jesus the right to do good on the Sabbath while they conspire to do evil on the Sabbath
A litmus test of true versus false religion is its response to injustice. In the face of the man’s need the religious authorities are “silent,” but Jesus is “angered and deeply distressed” (v. 5). The silence of the authorities is evidence that for them religion is about fulfilling stipulations
The greatest enemy of divine love and justice is not opposition, not even malice, but hardness of heart and indifference to divine grace, to which not even disciples of Jesus are immune
The extent of their malice shows in their choice of allies. The Herodians were people associated with Herod’s court, and under any other circumstances the Pharisees would have had little to do with them. The Pharisees were ardent nationalists who resented the presence of Roman soldiers on the land God had promised to give to Abraham’s children. This Herod made a career of courting favor from Rome, and he is the one who had John the Baptist thrown in jail. Seeking an alliance with this Herod was an act of malicious compromise