Prodigal

Sermon  •  Submitted
0 ratings
· 64 views

Prodigal son

Notes
Transcript

Info

Luke & Acts Commentary

The best robe was a sign of position and the ring also, especially if, as many hold, a signet ring is meant (cf. Gen 41:42; Esth 3:10; 8:2; [Zech 3:4]).… In his destitution his son went barefoot. But this was fitting only for a slave and the [sandals] marked him out as a freeman

Luke & Acts Commentary

Filled with love and compassion, the father welcomed him as he embraced, kissed, and forgave his wayward son (15:20)

St. Luke, Vol. III Vers. 11–32

Captain Sir W. E. Parry observes, “There is nothing even in the whole compass of Scripture more calculated to awaken contrition in the hardest heart than the parable of the Prodigal Son

St. Luke, Vol. III Vers. 11–32

It is the prince of parables, a gospel within the gospel, a mirror of man, an artless yet profound little drama of human ruin and recovery.

St. Luke, Vol. III Vers. 11–32

He is already feeling the pinch of wrong-doing. “And he began to be in want.” The fruit of evil deeds is revealing its poison. He finds himself in the grasp of premonitory pangs

St. Luke, Vol. III Vers. 11–32

Ever since he left his father’s house his inclinations have descended lower and lower. He tried to fill, to satisfy himself with them, but he could not. They merely stayed his hunger. There was a bitterness in their flavour which something in his palate nauseated. The pleasure of eating was gone. The food of a beast cannot satisfy the soul of a man

St. Luke, Vol. III Vers. 11–32

Sin creates a sort of moral insanity

St. Luke, Vol. III Vers. 11–32

When he was yet a great way off, his father saw him.” He had not seen his father, but “his father saw him.” Unconsciously to the son, the love of the father has been drawing him all the way. If he had lost the image of his father from his memory, he would never have attempted to return

St. Luke, Vol. III Vers. 11–32

Ran,”—willingness is too feeble an epithet to denote the impulse. There is eagerness in “ran.” God is hasting to save and bless

St. Luke, Vol. III Vers. 11–32

The father is not going to treat his son as an “hired servant.” God’s forgiveness must be God-like. God’s love is always greater in experience than in our most sanguine wishes and brightest hopes

St. Luke, Vol. III Vers. 11–32

For every step the sinner takes towards God, God takes ten towards him

The Gospel of Luke The Story of the Loving Father (Luke 15:11–32)

The robe stands for honour; the ring for authority, for if a man gave to another his signet ring it was the same as giving him the power of attorney; the shoes for a son as opposed to a slave, for children of the family wore shoes and slaves did not. (The slave’s dream in the words of the spiritual is of the time when ‘all God’s chillun got shoes’, for shoes were the sign of freedom.) And a feast was made that all might rejoice at the wanderer’s return.

The Gospel of Luke The Story of the Loving Father (Luke 15:11–32)

Once Abraham Lincoln was asked how he was going to treat the rebellious southerners when they had finally been defeated and had returned to the Union of the United States. The questioner expected that Lincoln would take a dire vengeance, but he answered, ‘I will treat them as if they had never been away.’

It is the wonder of the love of God that he treats us like that.

Luke & Acts Commentary

God was plainly active in the ministry of Jesus, forgiving and restoring sinners like the prodigal son, who had slipped into the greatest shame and degradation and had no claim on the father’s resources. Divine grace was not appreciated by the critics, who wanted to earn God’s favor and had no sympathy for those like the prodigal, who had to come back humbly to seek the Father’s mercy when they didn’t deserve it.

Luke & Acts Commentary

This parable, then, was clearly a weapon of controversy used by Jesus to challenge his critics to acknowledge the error of their ways, to see in his ministry God’s beneficent grace for sinners, and to enter with joy and celebration into life in the heavenly Father’s Kingdom, sharing in the party. Would they come in or stay outside? The choice was theirs, and the parable does not answer the question. If the Kingdom of God were like a party, would it not be tragic to remain outside? Jesus’ critics were given a choice.

Luke C. Kingdom Celebration over Restoring the Lost (15:11–32)

The old legs started churning. Arms stretched out. Lips reached for a kiss

Luke C. Kingdom Celebration over Restoring the Lost (15:11–32)

The son must be properly dressed for the party. Servants dashed off as they were commissioned to get the best robe, a ring, sandals—things all lost long before the pigpen.

What do the clothes represent?
Story of Joseph
Identity of the beliver
The robe given to the son represented the salvation received from Christ. It is His righteousness, His perfection that covers our sins. We’re no longer subjects of shame or guilt. Because we accept Christ as our savior, He does just that. He saves us from ourselves. “For He has clothed me with the garments of salvation, He has covered me with the robe of righteousness,” – Isaiah 61:10
The ring was a symbol of identity. Often a signet ring would be used with wax to mark a document as having been written by the one owning the signet ring. When we come to Christ, we do receive an identity. We are no longer children of flesh and blood, but children of God, through the gift of the Holy Spirit that connects us to Him.
“But as many as received Him, to them He gave the right to become children of God, to those who believe in His name…” – John 1:12
“The Spirit Himself bears witness with our spirit that we are children of God,” – Romans 8:16
What does this giving of a ring mean?  It is the granting of authority to a person.  Whoever has such a ring has the power of attorney for his master. He has authority, his master’s authority, to make decisions and to help the master govern his realm.
In the story about Joseph his father honors him with a long robe.  As that story continues, however, Pharaoh too wants to honor Joseph. What does he do?   “Pharaoh said to Joseph, see I have set you over all the land of Egypt, and removing his signet ring from his own hand, Pharaoh put it on Joseph’s hand, and then arrayed him in garments of fine linen.”  (Genesis 41:42)  There it is.  The robe and the ring!
And when the father places the ring on the hand of his son, he not only welcomes him back home as a son, as was indicated by the robe, but he welcomes him back to responsibility and authority. The young man is not to sit on the bench; he is to play on the team! He is to be co-ruler with his father and his brother.
In ancient Palestine there was another custom.  Servants in the house were always to be barefoot. It was the mark of their servanthood.  The wandering son had come back saying “I am no longer worthy to be called your son, make me as one of your hired servants”.  The father is saying, “No way!  You are my son; you are not my servant.\
The Robe, the ring and the running shoes are not thrown at him, saying, “Hey, put these on, you look a mess.” 
In the Near East, for an elderly gentleman to run was disgraceful. He often had long, flowing robes, and in order to run he would need to roll up his robes, allowing people to see his naked legs. This would be humiliating; it would be “outlandish behavior.”
So why did the father run? Because he was overjoyed to see his son. Because he had feared that his beloved was dead. Because the father was filled with love and compassion. Because he was eager to welcome him home. These are obvious. Less obvious is the fact that in heaping embarrassment and maybe even humiliation upon him- self through running to meet this prodigal son, the father was tak- ing the brunt of the community’s scorn and ridicule.
He literally “smothered him with kisses.” The father’s kiss “is a sign of reconciliation and forgiveness.
the best robe: This is literally the first robe, the finest robe, the foremost robe, the finest piece of clothing in the house, the one worn by the master or distinguished guests at festive occasions. This is like unto what had been done anciently: Rebekah gave a spe- cial robe to Jacob (Genesis 27:15), and Pharaoh gave one to Joseph (Genesis 41:42).
a ring on his hand: This was a signet ring. It entitled the bearer to access the estate’s most important documents and possessions. “Excavations have shown that the ring is to be regarded as a signet- ring; the gift of a ring signified the bestowal of authority.”14 The ring was “not simply an ornament, but a symbol of authority, espe- cially of royal authority.”15
shoes on his feet: Slaves went barefoot, while freemen wore shoes. The young man returned to prestige. Further, it is worth noting that the servants are asked to place the shoes on the boy, thus suggesting his reinstatement as a member of the family. The shoes “were worn in the house by the master, and not by the guests, who took them off on arrival. Hence they indicated authority and possession as well as freedom.”16
Unlike a fairy tale, the parable of the prodigal son does not end on the note of “and they lived happily ever after.” How does it end? Did the older brother close his ears to the loving counsel of his father, steel himself against compassion, and live and die an angry and bitter man? Or was he, we hope and pray, deeply touched by the love of his father—pure love for him, as well as his returning brother? Did he allow the power of the Almighty to transform his soul, reshape his attitudes and actions, and make him into an instru- ment of divine love? In fact, this is an open-ended story, and each of us must interpret its meaning in the light of our own experience.