Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.44UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.09UNLIKELY
Fear
0.1UNLIKELY
Joy
0.59LIKELY
Sadness
0.53LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.64LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.61LIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.94LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.64LIKELY
Extraversion
0.26UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.67LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.77LIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
RECAP
Mark 1:1-8: First we spoke about the introduction of Jesus by John Mark as the Christ, the Song of God.
We spoke about what that means to be the Christ and Song of God.
We then were introduced to John the Baptist.
He’s this kind of weird dude who walks around in camel’s with a leather belt eating locust with wild honey.
We talks about who this John guy is and why He was baptizing.
What did he mean that he was baptizing with water and one is coming who will baptize you with the Holy Spirit.
Mark 1:9-15: We saw the baptism of Jesus Himself.
We talked about how the trinity (God the Father, Jesus the Son, The Holy Spirit), were all three present at the baptism of Jesus just as they were all three present at the creation of the world.
(Creation & Redemption).
We spoke about within that the benefits of learning about the Trinity and how it teaches us to be less selfish.
And to live in conjunction with others.
Mark 1:16-20: we talked about Jesus calling His disciples.
How He is the one who calls us to give up our lives to put on this new identity to be His follower.
We spoke about the difference between false religion and the Gospel.
Today we’re continuing in the Gospel of Mark and will be reading Mark 1:21-28.
So let’s dive into this tonight...
When you think of what we just read… it’s pretty much sounds crazy.
Imagine being one of Jesus’ disciples who had just been called to follow Him recently.
One day on a Sabbath Jesus is asked to come and teach at a synagogue because He has been recognized as a different teacher, but a teacher nonetheless.
So You all go with Him to also listen to His teaching.
Well… the dude teaches with this AUTHORITY that nobody has heard of.
(We’ll get to that)
But then something else happens.
We have this straight up exorcism performed by this same guy we decided to follow a few days ago!
WHAT THE HECK IS GOING ON??
The point of this story in scripture tonight students is simple… Its AUTHORITY.
Jesus teaches with this UNIQUE AUTHORITY.
Jesus has authority that is given to Him by His Father (Mark 1:9-11) over two parts…
1.
Over the temporal (worldly affairs, secular)
2.
Over the supernatural.
(Things outside of this world.)
Authority over the temporal (worldly affairs/secular).
It was a common practice for visiting teachers to be invited to read the Scripture and/or speak, a custom from which Paul as well as Jesus benefited.
That Jesus was invited to speak indicates he had already established a reputation as a teacher and that this was not one of the first events in his ministry.
Jesus was recognized as a teacher even by his opponents (cf.
12:19), although there is no evidence that he had received any formal training.
Certainly he was not a typical rabbi.
We read that they go into Capernaum and immediately on the Sabbath Jesus goes to teach in the synagogue.
And the Bible says that they were ASTONISHED at His teaching.
That’s kind of interesting isn’t it?
I mean we see amazing things everyday.
Especially our my generation and down have had the unique opportunity to be able to see things that happen around the world that are amazing.
But how many times have you seen something truly astonishing?
That’s what the Bible says these people saw in the event of Jesus teaching.
The only possible standard to compare this to is that of the scribes.
Dayton why is a scribe?
The Gospel according to Mark (The Authority of Jesus (1:21–28))
In the first century, before the advent of universal education and literacy, there was a great demand for scribes throughout the ancient world, and especially in Judaism where the written code of the Torah regulated Jewish life.
The Hebrew word for scribes, sopherim, has to do with counting, reckoning, and keeping written documents, thus providing an initial understanding of the functions of a Jewish scribe.
The term “scribe” occurs early in the Davidic monarchy for a royal official who was a general secretary and recorder (2 Sam 8:16–17; 20:24–25; 1 Kgs 4:3).
In postexilic Judaism the word “scribe” came to designate an expert in the Torah, of whom Ezra was the first in an illustrious line (Ezra 7:6, 11).
The importance and fame of scribes grew during the Hasmonean period when Hellenistic ideals began to rival Torah-learning among the Jews.
Scribes were, first of all, experts in the Torah who were capable of issuing binding decisions on its interpretation.
Scribal knowledge of the Torah, and the means by which it was attained, were often regarded as esoteric enlightenment, and hence the more authoritative.
With the growth of the synagogue, scribes became, secondly, teachers of the Torah, whose reputation was honored by the title “rabbi,” meaning “my great one.”
Now, these SCRIBES were people who would quote and give some interpretive answers.
Their authority was mainly brought down from A “TRADITION OF ELDERS” (7:8-13).
But Jesus… His authority was different....
The Gospel according to Mark (The Authority of Jesus (1:21–28))
The word that Mark uses of Jesus’ authority, exousia
The Gospel according to Mark (The Authority of Jesus (1:21–28))
exousia is used more often than not of supernatural powers and authorities, especially of God and God’s works
The Gospel according to Mark (The Authority of Jesus (1:21–28))
In Mark exousia occurs nine times, six with reference to Jesus (1:22, 27; 2:10; 11:28, 29, 33) and three with reference to authority conferred by Jesus on the apostles (3:15; 6:7; 13:34).
Every instance of exousia therefore reflects either directly or indirectly the authority of Jesus.
Mark’s use of this defining term at the outset of Jesus’ public ministry establishes his authority over the highest authorities in both the temporal realm, as represented by the scribes, and the supernatural authorities, as represented by the demon in 1:23ff.
Jesus didn’t rely on other teachers.
He had no quotes.
Again and again in the gospels Jesus says, “You’ve heard that it was said…but I say to you.”
He spoke not in secondhand quotes but with firsthand authority.
As Tim Keller says, “He didn’t just clarify something that they already knew, or simply interpret the Scriptures in the way the teachers of the law did.
His listeners sensed somehow that he was explaining the story of their lives as the author, and it left them dumbfounded.”
So when we open the Bible and hear the teaching of Jesus, we encounter not just another good, moral teacher but the author of life itself.
As Jesus spoke in the synagogue, he spoke as the author of their very experience!
His authority reached far beyond the pulpit, it reached their hearts.
He knew what was going on inside each of them.
And inside of one of them was something far more than appeared on the surface.
There was evil lurking, and the call to repent and believe, the drawing near of the kingdom of God became too much.
The authoritative teaching of Jesus was tested.
Authority over the supernatural.
So we read Mark bringing us really the first true test of Jesus’ authority here in verse 23.
And we see that something that is even more impressive than Jesus’ authority as a teacher is His authority in the supernatural realm.
NOW, In light of this authoritative teaching, who would you expect to be the first to respond?
Maybe the synagogue leader?
Maybe the long-time congregants?
What about a demon?
Now… I realize bringing up demons can be a little weird.
It’s a difficult concept for many people.
(QUOTE ABOUT CONCEPT OF DEMONIC PRESENCE.)
Mark ((1) Teaching in the Synagogue and Exorcising an Evil Spirit (1:21–28))
As difficult as the concept of the demonic is for most people today, it cannot be satisfactorily treated as a primitive explanation for various kinds of physical and psychological illness.
A better explanation is that there is much less evidence of the demonic today because Jesus won a decisive, although not yet total, victory over it.
Now… we read that this demon inside the man ask this question… “What have you to do with us?
Have you come to destroy us?”
Many commentators wills tell you this seems more like a statement than a question… the demon knew exactly what was going to happen to him.
(QUOTE ABOUT V.24 QUESTION)
Mark ((1) Teaching in the Synagogue and Exorcising an Evil Spirit (1:21–28))
The second sentence, however, could be an assertion rather than a question: “You have come to destroy us!”
The demon tried unsuccessfully to oppose Jesus by employing his name.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9