Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.59LIKELY
Disgust
0.07UNLIKELY
Fear
0.05UNLIKELY
Joy
0.51LIKELY
Sadness
0.67LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.11UNLIKELY
Confident
0.63LIKELY
Tentative
0UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.93LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.68LIKELY
Extraversion
0.51LIKELY
Agreeableness
0.78LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.75LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Chapter 10
The following material is adopted from John MacArthur’s commentary on Romans and his Study guide.
Additional material taken from sources listed at the end
Read and summarize
Look for
— Prayers ( Blue )
— Promises ( Green )
— Warnings ( Red )
— Commands ( Purple )
Israel’s Failure - Part 1: Ignorance of the Person of God: His Righteousness ( 10:1-3 )
Paul’s Prayer for Israel ( 10:1 )
The Ignorant Zeal of Israel ( 10:2 )
The Ignorant Unrighteousness of Israel ( 10:3 )
Israel’s Failure— Part 2: Ignorance of the Provisions of Christ Ignorance of the Place of Faith ( 10:4-10 )
Israel Was Ignorant of the Provision of Christ ( 10:4a )
Israel was Ignorant of the Place of Faith ( 10:4b-10 )
Israel’s Failure — Part 3: The Parameters of Salvation The Predictions of Scripture ( 10:11-21 )
The Parameters of Salvation ( 10:11-18 )
The Predictions of Scripture ( 10:19-21 )
Additional Resources
MacArthur, Romans.
Romans 1-8.
Moody Press, 1987.
MacArthur, Romans.
Romans 9-16.
Moody Press, 1991.
MacArthur, John.
New Testament Commentary.
Moody, 1985.
William Hendriksen.
Exposition of Paul's Epistle to the Romans.
Grand Rapids: Baker, 1995.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9