Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.12UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.12UNLIKELY
Fear
0.09UNLIKELY
Joy
0.65LIKELY
Sadness
0.52LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.68LIKELY
Confident
0.08UNLIKELY
Tentative
0UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.94LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.61LIKELY
Extraversion
0.3UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.89LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.77LIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Gospel of Mark
Mark or otherwise known as John Mark.
It was common for Jewish Christians in the Hellenistic Judaism community to have a Hebrew name and a Greek name.
A Hellenistic Jew was a Greek-speaking Jew and that was what John Mark was before converting to Christianity.
Where we first meet Mark is in Acts 12:12 where we see that his mother hosted early church gatherings at her house.
We know that his mother Mary’s home was significant for the early church because Peter comes there when he gets out of prison.
Mary most likely was a wealthy woman because she owned property and it was big enough to house a church gathering.
There is another view that Mark was the boy that fled away from Jesus at the Garden of Gethsemane is held on something we can’t prove.
Which is that Marks mother Mary owned that garden.
According to this view, Mark would have been a guard in charge of the night watch when he was a young man.
It is a view that some will present and it is nice to think about, but there is no evidence to prove it.
I will have to ask God about it when I see Him after I leave this world.
There is one other common view of Mark.
They say that if Mary was involved in the early church then likely her home was used for the Last Supper in Mark 14.
Papias of Hieropolis an early church father (60AD-120AD) assures us that John Mark is the author of this Gospel.
The gospel of Mark is believed to be written around 50AD.
The early church fathers all concur and affirm that John Mark is the author of the gospel.
They all state that he interpreted and recorded Peter’s account of Jesus’s life.
John Mark would be an odd candidate for the authorship, but since the people that were there while it was happening affirm it, we trust them.
The early church was actually unanimous in their acceptance as John Mark as the author.
“It is in the following words: “This also the presbyter said: Mark, having become the interpreter of Peter, wrote down accurately, though not indeed in order, whatsoever he remembered of the things said or done by Christ.
For he neither heard the Lord nor followed him, but afterward, as I said, he followed Peter, who adapted his teaching to the needs of his hearers, but with no intention of giving a connected account of the Lord’s discourses, so that Mark committed no error while he thus wrote some things as he remembered them.
For he was careful of one thing, not to omit any of the things which he had heard, and not to state any of them falsely.”
These things are related by Papias concerning Mark.” – Papias of Hierapolis 60AD
John Mark helped Paul on the first missionary journey (Acts 12:25; 13:5).
We don’t know how he assisted them.
Some say as an interpreter, but also that he shared the gospel.
Mark was the cousin of another wealthy landowner, Barnabas.
(Colossians 4:10; Acts 4:36-37)
There was a sharp dispute over Mark between Paul and Barnabas on whether to take him on the next missionary journey.
So, Paul and Silas went one way, Mark and Barnabas went the other.
(Acts 15:37-39)
Paul and Mark apparently reconciled over the dispute.
We know that because of Scriptures like 2 Timothy 4:11 and Philemon 24.
The early church affirms that Peter is talking about John Mark in 1 Peter 5:13.
Which further proves that Mark was a disciple of Peter who interpreted and recorded Peter’s account of the gospel.
Son of God
So, we start our study in Mark on verse 1.
“The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God.” - Mark 1:1
The phrase Son of God is often confused when reading Scripture.
People have taken the title, Son of God, and taken it out of the context of Scripture.
The main false idea surrounding the name Son of God is that Jesus was created.
The truth is that Jesus wasn’t created.
He is eternal.
The other false idea surrounding the name Son of God is that Jesus isn’t God.
The truth is that Jesus is God.
I will show you how both of these are true in Scripture, but first I want to show you how the phrase son of God is used throughout Scripture.
Angels were called sons of God: Job 1:6 “Now there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the Lord, and Satan also came among them.”
Israel was called son of God: Exodus 4:22 “Then you shall say to Pharaoh, ‘Thus says the Lord, Israel is my firstborn son,”
True Christians are called sons of God: John 1:12; Romans 8:12-19; Galatians 4:4-6.
Jesus Christ is called the Son of God: Mark 1:1; John 1:49, as well as many other passages.
This is where we will be tonight.
The beginning of the gospel is that Jesus is the Son of God, but not in the same sense that angels, Christians, or Israel is a son of God.
Nathanael noticed that Jesus is different.
In fact, Nathanael recognizes Jesus as God.
Let’s look in John 1.
John 1:43–51 (ESV)
The next day Jesus decided to go to Galilee.
He found Philip and said to him, “Follow me.”
Now Philip was from Bethsaida, the city of Andrew and Peter.
Philip found Nathanael and said to him, “We have found him of whom Moses in the Law and also the prophets wrote, Jesus of Nazareth, the son of Joseph.”
Nathanael said to him, “Can anything good come out of Nazareth?”
Philip said to him, “Come and see.”
Jesus saw Nathanael coming toward him and said of him, “Behold, an Israelite indeed, in whom there is no deceit!”
Nathanael said to him, “How do you know me?” Jesus answered him, “Before Philip called you, when you were under the fig tree, I saw you.”
Nathanael answered him, “Rabbi, you are the Son of God!
You are the King of Israel!” Jesus answered him, “Because I said to you, ‘I saw you under the fig tree,’ do you believe?
You will see greater things than these.”
And he said to him, “Truly, truly, I say to you, you will see heaven opened, and the angels of God ascending and descending on the Son of Man.”
Nathanael doesn’t make the statement that Jesus is the Son of God, King of Israel for no reason.
Those were dangerous claims in the context of which Nathanael meant them.
He was referencing a prophesy about the Messiah.
Jesus is the foretold King of Israel in 2 Samuel 7. God tells David that he will have someone from his lineage that will come, and that His kingdom will be established forever.
This tells us that Jesus is eternal.
He was never created, He is eternal.
He is God.
Jesus is the Son of God.
He is the eternal One.
He is YAHWEH.
John 8:58 “Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I am.””
Nathanael was saying that Jesus is God, Jesus told the Pharisees that He is God.
He called Himself, I AM, YAHWEH.
That is the name of God that God gave to Moses at the burning bush.
Jesus wasn’t a mere man or an angle Hebrews 1.
He was truly God and truly man.
God the Son came down and dwelt among men as the God-man.
God had to come to earth.
A man doesn’t have the ability to give eternity or forgive sins.
Man doesn’t have the ability to not sin.
That power lies in God alone.
A Son looks like his Father, and Jesus reflected as a man exactly who He is.
He lived a perfect life without sin, while still feeling pain, sadness, anger, tiredness.
Philippians 2:6-7 “who, though he was in the form of God, did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped, but emptied himself, by taking the form of a servant, being born in the likeness of men.”
son of God or son of the devil?
A son of God reflects His very nature.
Jesus did it perfectly because He is God.
We cannot do it perfectly because we battle against the flesh, but does your life reflect His?
If not, you may not be a child of God.
A son of the devil is whoever doesn’t reflect God.
Someone who doesn’t believe or even professes to believe but doesn’t reflect God has no claim to God.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9