Instructions for Life in Christ
Good Morning
3 Nights of Prayer
Treder Bonfire
Instructions for Life in Christ
As is Fitting in the Lord!
Husband Love and Don’t be Harsh
Real spiritual leadership involves service. Just as Christ served the disciples, even to the point of washing their feet, so the husband is to serve his wife. This means putting aside his own interests in order to care for his wife. A wise and Christ-honoring husband will not abuse his leadership role.
Children
The command for children to obey does not give parents license for harsh treatment. Children must be handled with care. They need firm discipline administered in love. Fathers refers to both parents, although Paul’s words might stress the importance of discipline administered by fathers. The Greek word goneis (parents) in 3:20 includes mothers; pateres may mean parents (as in Hebrews 11:23), but here it is head of the household. Parents must not embitter their children by nagging and deriding. Belittling children, or showing by words or actions that they are unimportant to the parents, should have no place in Christian families. Discipline administered in derision ultimately discourages children, destroys their self-respect, and causes them to lose heart.
If the home is to be a means of grace it must be a place of rules … the alternative to rule is not freedom but the unconstitutional (and often unconscious) tyranny of the most selfish member.
C. S. Lewis
Slaves and Masters
Slaves played a significant part in this society, with several million in the Roman Empire at this time. Slavery was sanctioned by law and was part of the empire’s social makeup. Because many slaves and slave owners had become Christians, the early church had to deal straightforwardly with the question of master/slave relations. Paul’s statement neither condemns nor condones slavery. On one hand, Paul was not interested in starting a revolutionary movement to attempt to destroy the order of the empire. On the other hand, Paul was starting a revolutionary movement that would surely subvert all that Rome found pride in. But Paul was not a political organizer, and his movement was not political. All of Paul’s revolutionary zeal was developed in the context of the church as a new community in which selflessness and love constituted new relationships based not on power but on mutual affirmation. Would this destroy Rome’s empire? Emphatically, yes. Would it do so by armed revolt? Certainly not.