Sermon Tone Analysis

Introduction

Our world is certainly obsessed with origins.

It is typically at the origin of something that you will also pursuit of an origin they are really searching for is meaning.

This is at the root of our dilema.

Our spiritual dilema our relational dilema and the meaning of our existence.

It is important.

For instance, knowing the source and origin of COVID 19 would significantly change how we approach its treatment and handling of the pandemic.

Of course, our origin and the origin of the known universe and world is of great significance.

In fact, it is has enough bearing that as we started our new church here at CrossWay Christian Fellowship that we have spent the last several months discussing the Biblical root of origin according the Genesis account of the Bible.

I won’t go back through all the details, but suffice it to say that we have concluded that the Bible and modern theories are not compatible, even though we know that the Bible and scientific fact are compatible in most cases.

There are significant departures when it comes to the age of the universe and evolutionary theory.

But we also saw how those two secular theories are also scientifically incompatible.

We’ve talked about the origin of the universe, the origin of our planet, life, the seasons, light, man made in God’s image, marriage and sexual union, and so on.

Now we come to an origin that brings with it so much bearing on who we are and our relationship with God and each other.

The origin of evil.

Of the most prolific and burdensome questions for man is this issue of evil.

The true diagnosis of the human condition stems from this.

God, the creator of the universe, is all good and only good.

And His original creation was all good and only good.

You see, up until now, the world and creation is a perfect place.

There is no murder, no shame, no sin.

Adam and Eve are walking in perfect communion with God and each other.

Now, let me get a little philosophical.

God is not the author of evil.

If God created evil, then God would be both good and evil.

And if God were both good and evil, there would be no hope for the ultimate triumph of good.

If God were Himself evil, He could not therefore triumph over evil.

If God were the source of evil, He would have to be evil Himself.

And if He were evil Himself, then there could be no basis for salvation, for God could not save us from evil He was evil.

So, the biblical revelation of the original goodness of creation upholds the goodness - the holiness - of God.

And it makes the source of evil outside of God.

Because the source of evil is outside of God, God can and will conquer evil and ultimately save sinners.

To put it another way.

If you say there is evil, then you assume there is good.

And if there is good and evil, then there must also be a measurement of what is good and evil and so there must be a moral law.

If there is a moral law then there must be a moral law giver.

Because if there is no moral law giver, then there is no moral law, and if there is no moral law, there can be no evil.

The question we are left with then is, “where did evil come from?”

And the answer to that is only found in the Bible.

You’ll remember that God gave man 1 prohibition in Genesis 2:16-17 “16 And the Lord God commanded the man, saying, “You may surely eat of every tree of the garden, 17 but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for in the day that you eat of it you shall surely die.”

Now in Genesis 3 we find the entry and result of breaking that command:

When it comes to the origin of evil we have several options.

First, we can say that there is a cosmic power that unknowable, impersonal that launched everything in our universe and evil recklessly appeared.

Based on our study of Genesis 1 & 2 we can scratch that off.

Secondly, you can take the view that God does not even exist.

Since there is no God, there is no evil and there is no good in reality.

Those are only determined by the morals of culture.

Third, you can take the view that evil doesn’t really exist.

God is good, and therefore everything is good.

Evil, suffering, and death is just an illusion and you just have to claim your happiness.

Incidentally, that is the basis of Christian Science.

Fourth, you can say that God is transcendent of good and evil and only nudges life to keep it on track but other than that, like the first theory, He is indifferent.

This goes a step further and says that God manipulates evil for his purposes.

Or, you can take the view that God has limited power and when bad things happen, God cannot stop them because He is still in the process of working things out.

This is gaining popularity in Christian circles today and it is call process theology.

Lastly, you can say that evil was made by God and He made evil to accomplish good and be a shadow of His holiness.

None of these are biblically sound or have a standing in the verses we read just a few minutes ago.

To put it plainly, God is not responsible for evil; His creation and those who chose to depart from him are responsible.

Evil is not something that is created.

It does not have substance nor is it a force.

It is the absence of God and His holiness.

Everything that God created, He said that it was GOOD.

The Bible upholds this cover to cover.

Scripture always assigns the guilt and responsibility for all sin to creatures and never to God.

The origin of the detriment of the human heart is found in those seven verse we just read in Genesis.

The entry of sin is more than an obtuse infection, but it is a corruption of something that God had made pure and holy.

The moment Adam and Eve chose to doubt God’s law and depart from that one law, sin was introduced.

Jeremiah 17:9 “9 The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately sick;” This was not always the case.

God did not create man’s heart to be evil, He created man to love God and God alone.

But let me ask you something, why did God give man the choice to obey?

God didn’t program man to be ascetic or stoic in his relationship with God.

He created man to be passionate and determined.

Now, enter in the serpent.

Verses 1-5 are a dialogue that happens between the serpent and Eve; and essentially that dialogue has changed very little 6000 years later.

Genesis 3 only identifies the deceived here as a serpent, but it is a very safe assumption that this is Lucifer.

Satan is often identified in Scripture as a serpent or a dragon.

In Revelation he is identified as both:

Now God did not create Satan, he created the Angel who became Satan.

He led a rebellion against God and He with one-third of the angels in heaven fell from heaven.

Satan literally means “Resister.”

He is described by Paul as one who disguises himself as an angel of light (2 Cor 11:14).

We also know from Job that Satan is given liberty to roam through heaven and earth (Job 1:6).

So the most reasonable conclusion is that Satan used his liberty to enter the garden and take the form of a serpent.

And look at what he says: Gen 3:1 “Did God actually say, ‘You shall not eat of any tree in the garden’?”

John 8:44 says, Satan “is a liar and the father of lies.”

Notice that Satan twists God’s Word, “You shall not eat of any tree in the garden.

For the first time, the most deadly spiritual force ever released: the assumption that what God said is subject to our personal judgment.

‘Hey, Eve, let’s talk about what God said and how we feel about it.’

It is covertly smuggled into the world by means of Satan using a reptile as an instrument for the purpose of giving us a false liberty that we have the right to question what God says.

That was the cause of the first sin and the cause of every sin since.

Through this we then take it a step further just as Eve did originally.

Eve gives Satan an audience and begins a dialogue.

Let me add something here, Eph 4:27 tells us to “give no opportunity to the devil.”

And the moment she accepts the question from Satan he is given a foothold.

“We may eat of the fruit of the trees in the garden, but God said, ‘You shall not eat of the fruit of the tree that is in the middle of the garden, nor shall you touch it, or you shall die.’

”

Did you see what happens?

Did God tell Adam and Eve they could not touch the fruit?

What has happened is that in her mind, God’s command is unreasonable and so she adds to God’s prohibition and in her mind she is justifying the unreasonableness of God’s Word.

God had said, “Of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat.”

She takes it a step further and tells the serpent that God told her they couldn’t even touch it.