Clay and Thorns
Initial Questions
Barnett Commentary
It is the truth about him; but it is also the truth about the Corinthians. Yet Paul is not boasting of ‘special’ weakness. It is not weakness induced by religious exercises of fasting or all-night prayer vigils. He has not ‘emptied’ himself so that he might be ‘filled’. It is not a contrived or extraordinary weakness. It is simply the ordinary weakness of a servant of God weary in bone and limb from serving others in the gospel of Christ. ‘Just look at me,’ he is saying (12:6). ‘I am what I appear to be, nothing more. I am open and transparent; I have given you a window into my heart.’
WBC
Interpretation
Moreover if Paul was passive in the experience, he has no reason to boast. God chose that he should have it. So God should have all the glory (cf. 10:17).
Yet he has to introduce the experience in some way so that his rivals may not be the only ones to claim to have had visions and the like. Moreover if Paul was passive in the experience, he has no reason to boast. God chose that he should have it. So God should have all the glory (cf. 10:17).
Like all of us, Paul was not only ready to pray to God but also to tell him what the proper answer to the prayer should be!
More Notes
In the provinces more than in Rome, the sovereign was considered more of an absolute monarch, called to his position by providence rather than a magistrate with certain powers granted by law. There the emperor was viewed as a superhuman power, a personification of one of the national deities. Indeed, emperor worship was encouraged by local authorities in the provinces, especially as an instrument of unification in times of unrest.
Claudius (41–54) opposed any divine tribute for himself, claiming that such an honor belonged only to the gods; the senate deified him after his death upon the recommendation of Nero