A Job for Titus
Paul reminds Titus of the reason why he left him in Crete. He intended for Titus to ensure that the church was provided with qualified elder leadership. Paul charges Titus with seeing that this leadership is put in place, and he explains to Titus the character qualifications for such elders. Elders must not only have godly character; they must also be competent to teach the faith and to confront false teachers who oppose the faith.
Section Outline
I. Appointing Elders (1:1–16) …
B. An Elder’s Qualifications (1:5–9)
1. How to Appoint an Elder (1:5)
2. How to Recognize an Elder (1:6–9)
I. Elders must be above reproach with their families (v. 6)
1:6. Paul told Titus the characteristics a person should have in order to assume leadership within the church. The standards for church leadership are consistently high; they do not change based on location or time. Paul wrote almost identical instructions to Timothy.
II. Elders must be above reproach with their character (v. 7)
Although the natural human inclination is to limit responsibility to one’s own concerns, Paul makes it clear that church leaders live as examples for others. As exemplars, the elders that Titus appoints must be “blameless” (v. 6) in their relationships and in their conduct.
The word “blameless” needs careful examination since it is repeated twice in this text and explains much of the apostle’s expectation for leaders (vv. 6a, 7). The word cannot mean “sinless,” for then no one could qualify for leadership. At the same time, the apostle obviously has some measure of godliness in mind that requires definition from us. Scholars have long debated whether the standards for leadership in the early church were high or low. Although the list as it stands may appear daunting by modern measures, it could have been made far more intimidating. Note that among the Christian leadership qualifications there are no mountains to climb, no alligators to wrestle, no pilgrimages to make, no prophecies to utter, no ancient manuscripts to decode, no visions to conjure, no tortures to endure, and no miracles to perform. The standards for Christian leadership strictly relate to one’s example before others.
A “blameless” person in Paul’s usage is one whom others have no obvious reason to accuse for living inconsistently with his faith commitments. Paul’s “blameless” standard is based upon what others in the church see and observe. It is not so much a standard for one’s own internal assessment (which would be required by a term such as sinless or even good-intentioned) but rather reflects the assessment of external community observation. What others observe about a man being considered for office bears on his qualification for office.