Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.48UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.12UNLIKELY
Fear
0.11UNLIKELY
Joy
0.53LIKELY
Sadness
0.51LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.71LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.22UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.9LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.56LIKELY
Extraversion
0.31UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.72LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.52LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
1 Corinthians 4:14-17
Paul the Spiritual Father
*Vs.
14* “/I do not write these things to shame you, but as my beloved children I warn you.”/
In the preceding verses from our last study Paul and the other apostles’ lives which were patterned after the crucified life of Christ, were contrasted with the lives of the Corinthian believers which were patterned after the wisdom of the world.
(*4:8-13*) Now Paul says that he is not making this contrast in order to make them ashamed of themselves.
He doesn’t attach their identity and worth to their behavior, but he does want to warn them that they are in danger because of their behavior.
He is exhorting them to change their ways or they will suffer harm.
Paul is not saying these things because his own ego has been hurt by their rejection of his example and authority.
He is not seeking to restore a right relationship between himself and them for his own benefit but for their well-being.
Speaking of the relationships between natural children and their natural parents the Bible says, that children are to honor their parents in the Lord in order that it may go well with them.
We suffer harm when we do not honor our parents.
Now there seems to be a similar correlation between our relationship to our spiritual parents and our spiritual well being.
First of all, notice that Paul refers to the believers at Corinth as his beloved children.
The people in the churches that Paul planted were often referred to as his children because they were ones whom he led to faith in Christ.
They were spiritual children; and not just spiritual children but /beloved/ spiritual children.
As we become aware of how badly these Corinthian believers have been behaving and of how critical they have been of Paul it is a wonder that he can use such endearing terms when referring to them.
But have you ever noticed that loving parents have way more tolerance for their own kids than anyone else does, and loving parents have much more tolerance for their own kids than they do for anyone else’s kids?
The same is true in the spiritual realm.
If you have ever led someone to the Lord you will discover that you have far more patience with them, love for them and interest in their well being than you do for anyone else.
To Paul, these Corinthian believers, in spite of all their problems, were his beloved children.
And keep in mind that he is writing under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit so they are also beloved children to God.
* *
*Vs.
15 *“/For though you might have ten thousand instructors in Christ, yet you do not have many fathers; for in Christ Jesus I have begotten you through the gospel.”/
How is it that Paul can refer to these believers as his children?
On what basis can he consider himself to be their father?
In what sense has he begotten them?
According to this verse it is through the gospel.
Because Paul proclaimed to them the Gospel message and they responded with faith, in a certain sense he therefore is considered to be a spiritual father to them.
It is because of the Lord’s ministry through him that they had become children of God.
In John’s gospel Jesus made it clear that His people—the true children of God—will be produced not by physical procreation but by spiritual regeneration.
*John 1:12-13* “/But as many as received Him, to them He gave the right to become children of God, to those who believe in His name:// //who were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God/.”
So he said to Nicodemus, “/Most assuredly, I say to you, unless one is born again he cannot see the kingdom of God/” (John 3:3).And Paul says in Galatians 3 to the Jews and Gentiles alike, “/You are all sons of God through faith in Christ Jesus/.”
(Galatians 3:26).
So children are born into God’s family and receive their inheritance not by marriage and procreation but by faith and regeneration.
Incidentally, this means that single people in Christ have no disadvantage in bearing children for God, and may in some ways have a great advantage.
The apostle Paul was single in Christ, and he says here in verse 15 of his converts, “/For . . . in Christ Jesus I have begotten you through the gospel./”
Just as in the natural, our children are really God’s children, God created them and gave them life and God has a plan for their lives, they are not my own but His.
However He used us to bring them into this world and therefore we have an ongoing relationship with them and responsibility toward them.
Likewise there seems to be a similar relationship and responsibility between spiritual children and their spiritual parents.
I think that this is often ignored in our spiritual relationships.
We tend to be very irresponsible spiritual parents.
Notice that Paul never asks them to call him “father” and there is no indication that they ever did call him by the title of “father” which would have been an unbiblical practice, but there was a legitimate sense in which he had the relationship of a father toward them.
He had the relationship of a father towards them but never bore the title of father.
*Matthew 23:9 *“/Do not call anyone on earth your father; for One is your Father, He who is in heaven./”
Also, in Jewish culture the one who taught a boy the Torah (OT scriptures) was recognized as having begotten the boy into the faith.
/(Fee, p. 185) /Therefore because of Paul’s ministry of the gospel he has begotten them as children of God.
They are his spiritual children.
The word that is translated “instructors” in the expression, “/You might have ten thousand instructors in Christ . .
./” in the NKJV, (or as guides, guardians or tutors in some other translations) is not easy to translate accurately because we do not have the equivalent role in our culture.
/(ibid., p.185)/
It was somewhat similar to the role of a nanny but with more of a teaching responsibility.
The instructor or guardian was a trusted slave into whose care a father turned over his children.
The instructor or guardian was responsible to take the kids to and from school and to tutor them with their homework, to teach them good manners, to look after them in general and to oversee their overall development.
/(Morris, p. 80) /The guardian or instructor had a very important role in the development of the child to help bring the child to maturity, but the guardian never replaced the role or the authority of the father.
Likewise, the other apostles and teaching ministries (i.e., Apollos and Peter) who had followed Paul were like tutors or guides and they played an important part in ministering to the church in Corinth, but they did not replace Paul’s significance in their lives.
Paul was the only spiritual father for most of them and that gave him a special position of both influence and responsibility toward them.
No matter how much they had profited from other ministries they owed special honor to Paul, their spiritual father.
Who is your spiritual father or spiritual mother?
Who are your spiritual children?
Does every evangelist have this responsibility toward those he~/she leads to Christ?
It is not always possible, for example in the case of Philip and the Ethiopian eunuch in Acts.
However, I believe that under normal circumstances there is a responsibility to ensure that your spiritual children are being nurtured and cared for in the faith so that they can grow.
When we lead someone to faith in Christ we then have a responsibility toward them to nurture them and instruct them in the faith just as parents in the natural have a responsibility toward their biological children to nurture and care for them until maturity.
What do we think of natural parents who produce children but never take responsibility for their well being?
They are unfit to be parents.
Is it any different spiritually?
It would have been easy for Paul to have washed his hands of this rebellious church and let Apollos or Peter take responsibility for them.
But he does not abdicate his responsibility to his spiritual children.
Notice that the terminology for describing the relationship between the evangelist and the convert is all family related terminology.
The church is the family of God and we are to relate to one another in the church as we would relate to family members.
This is one of the main reasons we often refer to one another in the church as brother or sister.
It reflects the fact that we are members of a family, not members of an organization.
*1 Timothy 5:1-2* “/Do not rebuke an older man, but exhort him as a father, younger men as brothers,// //older women as mothers, younger women as sisters, with all purity./”
Let us not think that the referring to the church as family is just a sentimental comparison with real families.
The church family is a greater reality than our natural families.
Marriage and family are temporary for this age; the church is forever.
The radical biblical truth is this, belonging to a human family is no sign of eternal blessing, but belonging to God’s family means you are eternally blessed.
Relationships based on natural family are temporary.
Relationships based on union with Christ are eternal.
Marriage is a temporary institution, but what it stands for lasts forever.
“/In the resurrection/,” Jesus said, “/They neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like angels in heaven/” (*Matthew 22:30*).
And when his own mother and brothers asked to see him, Jesus said, “/Who is my mother, and who are my brothers?’
And stretching out his hand toward his disciples, he said, ‘Here are my mother and my brothers!/’”
(*Matthew 12:48-49*).
Of course Jesus loved his mother and his brothers.
But those are all natural and temporary relationships.
He did not come into the world focus on that.
He came into the world to call out a people for His name from all the families into a new family where whether single or married, orphaned or barren or accompanied by many natural relatives, we are all full-fledged family members on a par with all others, bearing fruit for God and becoming mothers and fathers, brothers and sisters of the eternal kind.
Some of us need to take a serious look at our attitude toward relationships and reorder our world.
“/Truly, I say to you, there is no one who has left house or brothers or sisters or mother or father or children or lands, for my sake and for the gospel/,” Jesus said, “/who will not receive a hundredfold now in this time, houses and brothers and sisters and mothers and children and lands, with persecutions, and in the age to come eternal life/” (*Mark 10:29-30*).
Are you struggling with a lack of natural relationships in your life?
Single person, barren mother, abandoned spouse, only child, do you want children, mothers, brothers, sisters?
Renounce your preoccupation with obtaining natural relationships and follow Jesus into the fellowship of the family of God.
/(Piper, John: Sermons from John Piper (2000-2007).
Minneapolis : Desiring God, 2007)/
* *
*Vs.
16 *“/Therefore I urge you, imitate me.”/
*/ /*
This expresses the heart of a father who is instructing his children to learn how they should live by following his example.
They are to be “like father, like children.”
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9