Biblical Hermeneutics
Notes
Transcript
Sermon Tone Analysis
A
D
F
J
S
Emotion
A
C
T
Language
O
C
E
A
E
Social
BIBLICAL
HERMENEUTICS
Copyright 1985,1993,2001,2007
Crossroads Full Gospel
International Ministries
All Rights Reserved.
No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in
any form or by any means, mechanical, photocopied, recorded or otherwise, without the prior
permission of the publisher. Short extracts may be used for review purposes.
Except otherwise stated, Bible quotes come from the King James Version. 1611 Elizabethan
English is updated in some cases to reflect present terminology, without changing the true
meaning of the word.
Extracts from “The Expositor's Study Bible” are identified as E.S.B. Copyright © 2005
Published by, and the sole property of, Jimmy Swaggart Ministries, Baton Rouge, LA, and
extracts from the Swaggart Bible Commentary series are identified as S.B.C. Copyright ©
World Evangelism Press®
Extracts from the Amplified Bible are identified as Amp. Old Testament Copyright © 1962,
1964 by Zondervan Corporation. New Testament Copyright © 1954, 1958, 1987 by The
Lockman Foundation.
Extracts from the New International Version are identified as N.I.V. Copyright 1973,1978,1984
by The International Bible Society. Used by permission of Zondervan Publishing House.
Also used: The New Testament: An Expanded Translation (Wuest) translated by Kenneth S.
Wuest. Copyright © 1961 by Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., Grand Rapids, Michigan.
Bracketed comments following some scriptures assist the reader in understanding the intended
meaning of these verses
We acknowledge the additional works of the various Scholars and Bible Commentaries used in
conjunction with the College material. This is not to say that we agree with all their theology,
but we certainly value their contribution to the Body of Christ.
Published by:
Crossroads Publications
10681 Princes Highway
Warrnambool
Victoria 3280
Australia
CONTENTS
BIBLICAL HERMENEUTICS.................................................1
DOCTRINE...........................................................................1
THE NATURE OF DOCTRINE...........................................1
A SCIENCE?.........................................................................1
DISCERNING TRUTH........................................................2
BIBLICAL HERMENEUTICS.............................................9
“HERMENEUTICS AND OTHER BIBLICAL
SCIENCES”........................................................................12
BIBLICAL HERMENEUTICS
DOCTRINE
Doctrine in the Greek is “Didache” and means “instruction,
teaching.”
Someone has said that Preaching proclaims the Gospel, while
Teaching explains the Gospel. However, all Preaching should have
some Teaching in the body of its delivery, and all Teaching should
have some Preaching contained therein as well. Also, even though
Teaching is altogether Doctrine, at least as a whole, all Preaching
should contain at least some Doctrine.
As should be obvious, Paul is outlining the necessity of what
Church is all about. While it definitely is to be a time of Refreshing
and Blessing, it is not to be limited to such, but as well a place of
Learning, which of course, can only be done in the language
understood by all the people.
Inasmuch as Doctrine, which constitutes what one believes, is so
very, very important, perhaps a little more information of this subject
would be helpful.
THE NATURE OF DOCTRINE
Christian Doctrine (the word, “Doctrine,” as stated, means
literally “teaching or instruction.”) may be defined as the
fundamental Truths of the Bible arranged in systematic form. This
study is commonly called Theology, which means literally “a treatise
or reasoned discourse about God.” (The two terms will be used
interchangeably in the following description.)
Theology or Doctrine may be described as the science that deals
with our knowledge of God and His relations to man, according to
His Word. It treats of all things insofar as they are related to God
and the Divine Purposes.
A SCIENCE?
Why do we describe Theology or Doctrine as a “Science”?
Science is the systematic and logical arrangement of certified
facts. Theology is called a Science because it consists of facts
1
relating to God and Divine things presented in an orderly and
logical manner.
Some may ask the question, as to what is the difference between
a Doctrine and a Dogma?
A Doctrine is God’s Revelation of a Truth as found in the
Scriptures; Dogma is man’s statement of that Truth as set forth in a
creed. 1
DISCERNING TRUTH
Background Reading: Luke 6:43-44
If a person is open to the Spirit of Truth (the Holy Spirit - our
Teacher), the greatest sign to show that a teaching is of God will be
God’s convicting power on the Word of truth when it is spoken in
wisdom and faith. As the Spirit bears witness with our spirit
(Romans 8:16) that the words being spoken are from God, if truly
open to this truth, we will experience an inner conviction. It is this
inner witness (the knowing within) that will tell us whether a
teaching is of God or not (again, that is if we are open to the Spirit of
God). However, many may be unable to correctly perceive this
leading. For this reason they need to be protected from the enemy
and themselves through submitting to God-given leadership - their
shepherds (pastors and teachers) within the Body.
God’s purpose in shepherding His people doctrinally is revealed
in His exhortation to Timothy:
2 TIMOTHY 4:2 Herald and preach the Word! Keep
your sense of urgency (stand by, be at hand and ready,
whether the opportunity seems to be favorable or
unfavorable, whether it is convenient or inconvenient,
whether it be welcome or unwelcome, you as preacher
of the Word are to show people in what way their lives
are wrong) and convince them, rebuking and
correcting, warning and urging and encouraging them,
being unflagging and inexhaustible in patience and
teaching. (Amp.)
Another version reads:
2
2 TIMOTHY 4:2 Preach the Word (refers to the whole
body of revealed Truth, which means the entirety of the
Word of God); be instant in season, out of season
(presents the idea of the Preacher holding himself in
constant readiness to proclaim the Word); reprove (the
Preacher is to deal with sin, both in the lives of his
unsaved hearers and in those of the Saints to whom he
Ministers, and he is to do so in no uncertain tones and
terms), rebuke (a suggestion in some cases of impending
penalty), exhort with all longsuffering and Doctrine.
(This tells us that the “reproving” and the “rebuking”
must be done with gentleness . . . ) (E.S.B.)
Many become shipwrecked in their faith because they never put
down roots, but move from church to church, thinking they are
qualified to act as their own pastors. This goes against the teaching
of scripture which states that God gave the offices of the Five Fold
Ministry (Apostles, Prophets, Evangelists, Pastors and Teachers) to
the Church for the express purpose of “ . . . the perfecting of the
Saints, . . . the work of the ministry, . . . the edifying of the Body of
Christ” (Ephesians 4:11-12).
“. . .Many become shipwrecked in their
faith because they never put down roots,
but move from church to church,
thinking they are qualified to act as their
own pastors. . .”
In fact part of God’s prescribed order for our Christian life is
to become committed to a local church and to submit to those whom
God has placed in authority over us in this place. There are
shepherds and there are sheep - and the sheep are ill-equipped to
shepherd themselves. Therefore we find specific instruction in God’s
Word to:
HEBREWS 13:17 Obey them who have the rule over
you, and submit yourselves (to them in the Lord): for
they watch for your souls (have a responsibility for your
3
spiritual welfare), as they who must give account (to the
Lord), that they may do it with joy, and not with grief:
for that is unprofitable for you.
This is not an authority which is to be exercised in a dictatorial
way, for all things need to be taken to the Lord in prayer. While the
shepherd must give account, each person is still responsible for their
own spiritual walk. The key in all this is humility, and a heart’s
desire to please the Father:
1 PETER 5:5 Likewise, you younger, submit yourselves
unto the elder. Yes, all of you be subject one to another,
and be clothed with humility: for God resists the proud,
and gives grace to the humble. (Proverbs 3:34)
1 PETER 5:6 Humble yourselves therefore under the
mighty hand of God, that He may exalt you in due time
(proclaims the route to the Blessings of God : E.S.B.)
The first sign which shows that a teaching is of God is that it
will line up with His Word - His principles. Then if it does, it must
also be a balanced message, in context, and applicable for today.
Indeed there are many hermeneutical rules which govern the
interpretation of scripture. Biblical hermeneutics is the science of
interpretation of scripture.
Note that we will not know if a teaching is correct by how much
emotional response we have to it, or by how “comfortable” we feel.
Both of these indicators can be based purely on the senses, and the
senses are not able to accurately or objectively discern spiritual truth.
“. . .The first sign which shows that a
teaching is of God is that it will line up
with His Word - His principles. . .”
When God’s teachings are received and acted upon in faith, His
power will be released to back up His Word of truth. And there will
be signs and wonders which accompany and confirm the preaching
of the message of truth.
4
ROMANS 1:16 For I am not ashamed of the Gospel of
Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation (of
spirit, soul and body) to every one who believes . . .
MARK 16:20 And they (the early Church) went forth,
and preached every where, the Lord working with them,
and confirming the Word with signs (and wonders)
following. Amen.
These signs will include lives transformed at an experiential
level to express the fruit of the Spirit.
GALATIANS 5:22 But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy,
peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith,
GALATIANS 5:23 Meekness, temperance: against such
there is no law. (This fruit can only develop when
Christians are led and empowered by the Spirit.)
GALATIANS 5:24 And they who are Christ’s have
crucified the flesh with the affections and lusts.
GALATIANS 5:25 If we live in the Spirit (speaks of
salvation), let us also walk in the Spirit (speaks of
ongoing sanctification, i.e. living our life on a daily basis
according to the graces and energies of the Divine
Nature).
We cannot, however, rely on the numbers of people being saved
and healed alone to tell us whether a certain teaching is truth or not.
This is because people have wills and can reject the truth, thus
choosing not to receive of God’s teachings through His chosen
vessels. By doing so, such people remain in bondage because of their
unbelief or rebellion. Therefore we cannot rely on signs alone to
establish the authenticity of a teacher or teaching.
5
“. . .We cannot, however, rely on the
numbers of people being saved and
healed alone to tell us whether a certain
teaching is truth or not. . .”
Indeed the power of the Gospel is only realized when people
receive, believe and act on God’s Word in faith - for until truth is
believed and acted upon, it will remain merely empty or dead words.
But when it is appropriated according to the conditions of God’s
Word, it is transformed into the living word which can release the
power of God unto salvation of spirit, soul and body.
We can see an example of people rejecting God’s teachings
when Jesus, the greatest teacher of all, returned to Nazareth, His
home town.
MARK 6:1 And He went out from thence (Capernium),
and came into His own country (hometown - Nazareth);
and His Disciples follow (accompanied) Him.
MARK 6:2 And when the Sabbath day was come, He
began to teach in the synagogue: and many hearing
Him were astonished, saying, “From whence has this
man these things? and what wisdom is this which is
given unto Him, that even such mighty works (miracles)
are wrought by His hands? (They did not question the
wisdom or the works, but rather His right to do such
things. In their thoughts, He wasn’t worthy!) (E.S.B.)
MARK 6:3 Is not this the carpenter, the Son of Mary,
the brother of James, and Joses, and of Juda, and
Simon? and are not His sisters here with us? ” And they
were offended at Him (disapproved of Him).
MARK 6:4 But Jesus said unto them, “A Prophet is not
without honour (proper deference and reverence), but in
his own country, and among his own kin, and in his
own house (probably meaning His brothers and sisters).”
6
MARK 6:5 And He could there do no mighty work,
save that He laid His hands upon a few sick folk, and
healed them.
MARK 6:6 And He marvelled (was amazed) because of
their unbelief . . .
Even though God had performed many mighty miracles and
wonders through Jesus’ ministry, people still rejected Jesus and His
teachings, and the same still happens today to God’s ministers.
Therefore a lack of signs and wonders does not necessarily mean that
a teaching or a ministry is not of God.
However, we can state categorically that if a teaching does not
line up with God’s Word, we need to reject it, no matter what socalled “signs” may accompany it (2 Corinthians 11:13-15). Thus to
know if a teaching is correct and in context, we must know the
principles contained within God’s Word. Otherwise we could be
deceived by wrong teaching and succumb to confusion and error.
We need proper doctrinal filters to work through the doctrines of the
Bible. In other words, scripture will not contradict itself, and will
always harmonize. As we understand basic doctrines, we can use
these as a filter by which other doctrine can be tested, and if true,
then digested. As scripture itself tells us, we must be built up,
doctrine upon doctrine, “For precept must be upon precept, precept
upon precept; line upon line, line upon line; here a little, and there a
little” (Isaiah 28:10). In this way we can progress gradually from the
milk of the Word to the meat of the Word:
HEBREWS 5:13 For every one who uses milk (doesn’t
refer to new Christians but those who have had
opportunity to grow in the Word and haven’t done so) is
unskilful in the Word of righteousness: for he is (still) a
babe.
HEBREWS 5:14 But strong meat (of the Word) belongs
to them who are of full age (mature in the Lord), even
those who by reason of use have their senses exercised
to discern both (distinguish between) good and evil.
7
EPHESIANS 4:14 That we henceforth be no more
children (immature Christians), tossed to and fro, and
carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the sleight
of men (unscrupulous teachers of falsehood), and
cunning craftiness, whereby they lie in wait to deceive
(by deliberate scheming)
Remember that the foundation of all doctrine is the Cross.
Therefore anything, meaning any doctrine which is not based on
Calvary - on the Cross (the Atonement) - will be false and will bring
nothing but error and distraction of one kind or another.
“. . .We need proper doctrinal filters to
work through the doctrines of the Bible.
In other words, scripture will not
contradict itself, and will always
harmonize. . .”
We are responsible for our own personal growth in the Lord.
We are responsible for what we do with what we hear. God has
commanded us to seek Him and His truth with all we have, and He
promises that if we do, we will find both. To do anything less than
this is to deny ourselves God’s fellowship and love, and this may
bring bondage into our lives and even cause others to remain in
darkness (through a lack of discipleship and Christian witness on our
part).
God will protect new Christians in their initial growth in a
limited way as long as they follow Him wholeheartedly. Just as
parents care for their children and protect them from harm when they
can, God does the same. However the degree of help, protection and
provision that God gives will depend on the individual’s willingness
to allow Him to do so. And we need also to allow God to direct us in
regard to the church we attend and the ministry we sit under, for in
these matters we are also responsible before God. We should allow
these things to be of God’s choosing, not ours - for in relation to God
we are but babes, and it is He Who knows both us and the future. So
leave the future in His hands, by allowing Him to lead in all these
areas.
8
“. . .We need to allow God to direct us in
regard to the church we attend and the
ministry we sit under, for in these matters
we are also responsible before God. . .”
BIBLICAL HERMENEUTICS
The word hermeneutics comes from the Greek word
HERMENEUO. It means to explain, interpret, or translate. When
used as a noun, HERMENEUO refers to the power or faculty of
interpreting and explaining the meaning of a text.
Larry Hunt has rightly said in his book “Biblical Exposition”
page 13 (underlines added), “Students have come to me claiming
they see no need to investigate hermeneutical principles or to
acquire an understanding of what a passage meant to its original
hearers or readers. To them, it is not necessary to spend time doing
word studies. They especially see no need to consider grammatical
construction because, as they emotionally point out, the Bible itself
declares that the Holy Spirit will lead us into all truth. This opens
an area of discussion which is too large to deal with at length in this
context, and yet it is consequential enough to address it. Sufficient
for the moment, however, is the declaration that a mere cognitive
understanding of historical settings, grammar, word meanings, etc.
is not good enough. You can get that much in any ‘decent, dead’
Bible college or seminary or church, for that matter, and there are
plenty of them to go around! What we need is to know the presence,
leading, and mind of the Holy Spirit Who inspired this great Word of
God, for the Word He inspired is certainly not dead. Quite to the
contrary, it is alive, quick, and powerful to the point that it gets right
into the tiny cracks and crevices of our lives, exposes them, convicts
us about them, instructs us what to do, lists out the alternatives, and
demands a decision. Only the Holy Spirit can do that.” 2
Therefore we can understand that both are needed - an
understanding of how to interpret the Bible, plus the Anointing of the
Holy Spirit which brings life and revelation to what may otherwise
be the dead letter.
9
“. . .What we need is to know the
presence, leading, and mind of the Holy
Spirit Who inspired this great Word of
God. . .”
“Hermeneutics” can be explained in these terms:
“The Science of Hermeneutics.
We have defined hermeneutics as the science and art of
interpretation. It is a science because it can reduce interpretation,
within limits, to a set of rules. It is an art in that the application of
the rules remains complex, requiring a skilled interpreter.
Hermeneutics is the pivotal point of all science because it is the
bridge of communication. We will now consider the necessity and
importance of hermeneutics under the following two headings:
General Hermeneutics, including all forms of communication; and
Biblical Hermeneutics, dealing with God’s communication to man.
A. General Hermeneutics
General hermeneutics refers to the various sets of rules which
are used in the interpretation of the materials presented through the
many forms of communication. Communication is the transmission
and reception of thoughts and feelings in a medium common to both
sender and receiver. All forms of communication, including speech,
literature, and the arts, present subject matter which need
interpretation by the proper application of the rules of general
hermeneutics. When something hinders clear understanding in the
process of communication, there arises the need for interpretation.
Whenever communication is to take place, it must be recognized
that a gap in understanding may exist between the communicator
and the receiver. For communication to be successful, there must be
a common medium between the two in order that this gap may be
bridged. The rules of interpretation supply us with the materials
with which the bridge can be built. Between the sender and receiver
there lies a vast field of experience which may contain differences
that cause understanding gaps. In other words, both sender and
10
receiver has his own frame of reference around the message being
relayed.
B. Biblical Hermeneutics
General hermeneutics is the science of interpreting the
communication of man to man. Biblical hermeneutics is the science
of interpreting the communication of God to man. This Divine
communication has come to man in the form of sacred literature the Bible.
It is certain that God has spoken to man in His Word: Jesus - the
Living Word; and the Bible - the Written Word. But what has He
said? The primary purpose of Biblical hermeneutics is to ascertain
what God has said in the Scriptures and to determine its meaning.
We derive no benefit from the fact that God has spoken unless we
understand what is meant by what He said.
As previously noted, there is an understanding gap between the
minds of the communicator and receiver which must be bridged in
order for an effective transfer of ideas to take place. If this is true
concerning man to man communication, how much more it applies to
communication from the infinite God, who is omniscient, to the mind
of the finite man, whose frame of reference is limited.
It must also be recognized that God communicated His truth
through human writers utilizing their frames of reference. This
serves to doubly necessitate the proper interpretation of Scripture.
(Both God to man; and God through man, to man).” 3
(underlines added).
“. . .The primary purpose of Biblical
hermeneutics is to ascertain what God
has said in the Scriptures and to
determine its meaning. . .”
Again, Kevin Connor’s book outlines the various Biblical
sciences and how they inter-relate. These are some terms of which
we as Bible students need to be aware.
11
“HERMENEUTICS AND OTHER BIBLICAL SCIENCES”
It is necessary that the Bible scholar have an understanding of
the inter-relatedness of the various Biblical sciences. Hermeneutics
is not to be viewed as a solitary science, but rather as a link in a
chain of related sciences. The major Bible sciences are the study of
the Canon (Canonology), Historical Criticism, Textual Criticism,
Hermeneutics, Exegesis and Biblical Theology.
A. Canonolgy - The word “canon” simply means “a rod, rule,
or measuring stick.” This science has to do with determining which
sacred books measure up to the standing of Divine inspiration. By
Divine inspiration we mean that God inspired the very thoughts and
words of Scripture, utilizing the writer’s frame of reference yet
without corrupting the communication.
The books which measure up to this standard are to be
recognized as “God-breathed” - the very Word of God (II Timothy
3:16). These would include the sixty-six books of the Authorized
Version of the Bible. The Apocrypha is excluded.
B. Historical Criticism - The word “criticism” is not used here,
nor in the following section, in the negative destructive sense.
Rather it is used to connote discernment. This science deals with the
authorship, date, historical circumstances, authenticity of contents,
and literary unity of the books.
C. Textual Criticism - The word “textual” refers to the actual
wording of a book. This science does not attempt to undermine the
inspiration of Scripture but rather to determine as accurately as
possible the original wording of the inspired text. This process is
complicated by the fact that the original manuscripts no longer exist.
Those copies which do exist are many and vary in quality. This
requires keen discernment on the part of the textual critic.
D. Hermeneutics - This science is not concerned with
inspiration (Canonology), background (Historical Criticism), or the
wording of the books (Textual Criticism), but instead is concerned
with determining the principles by which the books may be
interpreted.
12
E. Exegesis - The word “exegesis” comes from a Greek word
(exhegesisthai) meaning “to guide or lead out.” It refers to bringing
out the meaning of any writing which might otherwise be difficult to
understand. The science involves the application of the rules of
hermeneutics. While hermeneutics provides us with the tools,
exegesis refers to the actual use of these tools; hermeneutics supplies
the principles of interpretation, while exegesis is the process of
interpretation. Exegesis, then, can be thought of as applied
hermeneutics.
F. Biblical Theology - The word “theology” comes from two
Greek words (theos = God and logos = word), and means literally,
“the study and discourse of God.” The science of Biblical theology
involves the compilation, categorization, and summarization of
Biblical doctrines. It formulates conclusions on a Biblical subject by
considering all the Scripture relative to that subject.
A definite progression can be seen in these six related Bible
sciences. As noted by Ramm. (p.10):
1. The study of the canon determines the inspired books.
2. The study of historical criticism gives us the framework of
the books.
3. The study of textual criticism determines the wording of the
books.
4. Hermeneutics gives us the rules for the interpretation of the
books.
5. Exegesis is the application of these rules to the books.
6. Biblical theology is the result.
These six sciences can be easily divided into two groups of three:
the first group deals with the infallible materials the Bible student
has available; the second group is concerned with his use of these
materials. Both groups are units; three-fold cords which should not
be broken (Ecclesiastes 4:12). Canonology, historical criticism, and
textual criticism are bound together and provide the Bible student
with a solid basis upon which he can build. These three are then
completed by the second group. Hermeneutics provides the
guidelines for exegesis, which in turn sets the stage for Biblical
theology.
13
Proper application of God’s Word is dependent upon proper
interpretation of it. All exposition, preaching, and teaching must,
therefore, be based on the appropriate exercise of the principles of
hermeneutics, exegesis, and Biblical theology.
“. . .Proper application of God’s Word is
dependent upon proper interpretation of
it. . .”
Hermeneutics and Church Divisions
It is important to recognize that many of the divisions within
Christianity have arisen, not only out of carnality or sectarianism,
but also because of differences in the field of hermeneutics. It must
be understood that one’s theological viewpoint is determined
primarily by his hermeneutics. Thus a difference is hermeneutics
will most likely lead to a difference in doctrine.
The issue debated in Christendom is not so much whether God
has spoken (though many skeptics argue this point); nor is it so
much the specific books in which He has spoken. It concerns, rather,
the question of what God meant by what He said. The problems that
arise, in other words, are not over inspiration as much as they
concern interpretation and application.
It should be noted, however, that it is possible to adhere to the
same system of hermeneutics and still reach differing doctrinal
conclusions as a result of a difference in exegetical approach.
It can be concluded, then, that one of the most logical and
effective means of solving the problem of divisions within
Christianity would be to first settle the differences that exist in the
principles and application of hermeneutics. If the principles used in
the interpretation of Scripture were applied uniformly, there would
be a basic agreement in the resultant theology. This, in turn, would
eliminate or minimize many of the doctrinal differences which now
divide the Body of Christ.” 4
(underlines added).
Larry Hunt sums it all up as follows: “The vast majority of
error, if not all, has its roots (although not exclusively so) in the
absence of good hermeneutical principles. As a result, truth has
14
been turned into falsehoods that lead many down the pathway of
darkness instead of light. Hermeneutics, therefore, is not a negative
word to those who actually understand the meaning, significance,
and importance of correct Biblical interpretation. Furthermore,
those who take their calling personally and seriously will also be
interested in how to properly interpret the Bible.” 5
(underlines added)
Of course we were never designed to be islands unto ourselves,
and our Christian walk includes commitment to a local body of
Believers with whom we can share our faith and be mutually
encouraged and edified. We can also understand that Christians are
not meant to teach or pastor themselves in the sense of being
independent, and isolated from the Body. Yes the Holy Spirit will
bring revelation of the Word, yet this almost always takes place in
the context of submission to God-ordained ministers of the Gospel,
teachers and pastors through whom the Lord works in order to edify
and develop the maturity of the Saints of the Kingdom.
“. . .We were never designed to be islands
unto ourselves. . . .and Christians are not
meant to teach or pastor themselves in
the sense of being independent, and
isolated from the Body. . .”
For an in depth study on this subject we recommend Kevin
Connor and Ken Malmin’s book “Interpreting The Scriptures,”
May you have the victory in Christ.
15
REVIEW OF TEACHING BOOKLET
Fill in the blanks.
1. The Bible is the ....................................... inspired Word of God,
written by men over centuries of time who were
specifically ............................ and ......................................... by God
to do so.
2. The Bible contains ................ books, of which ............... make up
the Old Testament and ................ make up the New Testament.
3. The Old Testament books are not arranged chronologically but
according to the .............................. they cover.
4.
The
law
books
are
as
follows: .............................., ........................................, ....................
..............................,
....................................,
and ........................................................ .
5. The books from Joshua
called .................................... books.
through
to
Esther
are
6. There are ................ books of major prophets and ..................
books of minor prophets.
7. The Apocrypha is a collection of books written in the 400 year
period between the .................. and ..................... Testaments, and is
not regarded by the Protestant Church as ............................. inspired,
i.e. as being part of the ............................. of scripture.
8. The New Testament books are also arranged by ..............................
or .............................., not according to the time in which they were
written.
9. The five classifications of New Testament books are as follows:
1) the gospels,
2) .....................................
3) ..................................... letters, 4) .................................. letters
5) .................................... .
16
10. The 66 books of the Bible, written over a period of .....................
years, show a remarkable .............................. of thought and purpose,
and point to a divine ......................... .
11. The Word of God provides us with ......................................, and
exhorts us to live according to godly ................................................. .
12. There are many ................................ of the Bible but one Author,
and
both
the
Old
..................................
and
the
New ................................. constitute the written Word of God.
13. There are many physical ...................... - ......................... in the
Old Testament which point to spiritual truths in the new. The reason
this is possible is because of God’s ................................... .
14. The pivotal point for mankind’s redemption is the .......................,
and we could say that everything recorded in the Bible points
to ............................... .
15. The ................ Testament contains the principles of God which
are for us to live by, just as the ..................Testament does.
Therefore we should regard the ................. Testament as relevant and
necessary to our study today.
16. The Old Testament was originally written in ...........................,
and the New Testament was originally written in ............................. .
17. In the Third Century BC, the Old Testament was translated
into ............................. by Jews living in Alexandria. This was called
the ...................................., and would have been the version read and
studied by ......................... .
18. The spread of ................................... was enhanced by the fact
that everyone in Jesus’ day spoke ............................ .
19. In the Fifth Century AD, Jerome translated the Old and New
Testaments into ........................, the common language of the day.
This version was known as the ................................., and remained in
widespread use until the ..................
.................... Version was
published in .................... .
17
20.
The
first
English
Bible
was
by ................. ............................. in .................... .
translated
21.
The
true
father
of
the
English
Bible
was ........................ .........................., later ............................ at the
stake for his efforts in ................... .
22. The ..................................... in the 16th Century had begun the
move to translate the ........................ into people’s national
languages, so they could read and .................................... it.
23. The ................ ......................... Version was translated by 54
scholars, remains the most widely used ............................ translation
in the world, and is recommended to the serious
Bible ............................. .
24. Translators usually approach their work from one of two
directions - the ................................ translation involves translating
each .................... of the text whereas the .................................... is a
translation of .......................... .
25. The ................................. translations are usually helpful to read,
but are not suitable for serious .......................... .
26.
Two
examples
of
literal
translations
the
........................
............................
Version
the ............................ ......................................... Standard.
are
and
27.
Two
examples
of
paraphrase
translations
are
the .............................. ..................... & the J B ..................................
.................... ................................... .
28. A third approach to translation work is the ...................................
.................................... .
29. Both the ................................
............................ Version and
the .............................. ........................................ Standard attempt to
modernize the language of the K.J.V. and are both excellent study
Bibles.
18
30. The New World translation is a
the ............................ .......................................... .
publication
of
31. Paraphrase Bibles can weaken foundational ............................,
and often contain bias because they usually represent the translation
work of one ............................. rather than a large group of people.
32. The ..................................... Bible is not a translation but an
amplification
of
the
text,
and
helps
broaden
the
reader’s ........................................... of the Biblical narrative.
33. The ........................................... Bible is a modern Catholic Bible
which includes ............ apocryphal books and makes some changes
in the text due to doctrine.
It equates the Church
with .......................................... ............................................... .
34. The ............................. Bible is easy to ...................... but also
inaccurate and oversimplified in areas.
35. The ...............
.................................... Version is accurate and
clearly written, a true ....................................... not a paraphrase, and
can be recommended to both new ........................................ and Bible
students.
36. The New ................... ...................
....................... is an
accurate translation which has ............................. the language of the
King James.
37. The discovery of the ..................... .............. ...................... in
1947 gave scholars Old Testament manuscripts dating back to 250
BC.
38. All our Bibles today are really translations of manuscripts and
scrolls which were hand produced copies of copies of copies written
down over a period of around 1400 ...................... .
39. We should have several ......................................, when studying
the Bible, to check seeming inconsistencies or problems which
appear in the text.
19
40. We should follow proper ....................................... principles
while studying scripture so that we can interpret what we study,
properly.
41. Remember when studying the Bible that the Holy Spirit will
never .................................. Himself, in other words, everything
will .................... together if properly interpreted.
42. We should not seek .................................... for the sake of
knowledge, but to have God’s ............................. revealed to our
hearts so we can gain the faith to walk in His will for our lives. This
should be our highest ............................ when we study God’s Word.
20
THE BIBLE AND ITS AUTHORSHIP - Answers
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
divinely, chosen, anointed
66, 39, 27
subjects
Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy
history
5, 12
Old, New, divinely, canon
subject, author
history, Pauline, general, prophecy
1600, integrity / unity, Author
boundaries, principles
writers, Covenant, Covenant
type-patterns, foreknowledge
cross, Calvary
Old, New, Old
Hebrew, Greek
Greek, Septuagint (LXX), Jesus
Christianity, Greek
Latin, Vulgate, King James, 1611
John Wycliffe, 1380
William Tyndale, burned, 1536
Reformation, Bible, understand
King James, English, student
literal, word, paraphrase, ideas
paraphrase, study
King James, New American
Living Bible, Philips New Testament
dynamic equivalent
Revised Standard, New American
Jehovah Witnesses
truths / doctrines, person
Amplified, understanding
Jerusalem, 11, Roman Catholicism
Living, read
New International, translation, Christians
King James Version, simplified
Dead Sea Scrolls
years
21
39.
40.
41.
42.
translations
hermeneutical
contradict, fit
knowledge, truths, goal
For further information or teaching material to help you grow in
the Christian faith, please visit:
CROSSROADS INTERNATIONAL
FULL GOSPEL MINISTRIES
crossroadsministries.org.au
22
1
2
3
4
5
S.B.C. I Corinthians pg.478.
Dr. Larry
Hunt, Biblical Exposition, page 13.
Kevin Connor and Ken Malmin, “Interpreting The
Scriptures,” pgs 3 and 5.
Kevin Connor and Ken Malmin, “Interpreting The
Scriptures,” pgs.7-9.
Dr. Larry Hunt, Biblical Exposition, pg.11.