Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.11UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.09UNLIKELY
Fear
0.09UNLIKELY
Joy
0.61LIKELY
Sadness
0.59LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.66LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.07UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.9LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.75LIKELY
Extraversion
0.12UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.51LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.69LIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Intro:
Read Judges 2:1-5
I. Called Out vs. 1-6
vs. 1-3 Angel of the Lord
It is likely that this was God Himself, appearing in a human form.
There are frequent Old Testament appearances of the Angel of the LORD that indicate that it is God Himself.
tAssuming this to be a divine appearance (as the author believes it does indicate), we surmise that this was Jesus Christ appearing to the people of Israel before His incarnated appearance in Bethlehem.
We know this is Jesus for two reasons.
First because the Angel of the LORD here claimed divinity by saying that He was the one who led Israel up from Egypt, who made a covenant with Israel (Judges 2:1), and who personally called Israel to obedience (Judges 2:2).
Second because this person, appearing in human form before Israel, cannot be God the Father, because the Father is described as invisible (1 Timothy 1:17) and whom no man has seen or can see (1 Timothy 6:16).
The idea of Jesus, the Second Person of the Trinity, appearing as a man before Bethlehem is provocative, but logical.
We know that He existed before Bethlehem (Micah 5:2); why should He not, on isolated but important occasions, appear in bodily form?
We see other places where this happened, such as Genesis 18:16-33, Genesis 32:24-30, and Judges 13:1-23.
The first thing Jesus (as the Angel of the LORD) did was to remind Israel of His great love and faithfulness to them.
He delivered them from Egypt’s bondage; He gave them an abundant land of promise; He gave them a covenant that He would never break.
It is God’s general pattern to remind us of His great love and faithfulness to us before calling us to obedience or confronting our sin.
1 John 4:19
We love because he first loved us.
We can only really obey Him as we walk in His love and abide in His covenant with us
The words, “I will never break My covenant with you” remind us that even though Israel never fully lived up to their part of the covenant, God promised that He would never forsake His part of the covenant.
You have not obeyed My voice.
Why have you done this?
The Angel of the LORD confronted Israel in love.
The question was stinging in its simplicity; there is never a good reason for our disobedience.
I will not drive them out before you; but they shall be thorns in your side:
The Angel of the LORD announced that He would allow the work of possessing the land to go unfinished as a way of correcting a disobedient Israel.
I will not drive them out before you reminds us that God would not do the work of conquering Canaan all by Himself.
In the early years of the campaign in Canaan God did fight for Israel in a supernatural way.
Yet He never intended it to be that way for the entire campaign of conquering the Canaanites.
We often wish that God would do the work of Christian maturity for us; that we would wake up one morning and a certain besetting sin will just be gone.
Sometimes God grants such a miraculous deliverance, and we praise Him for it.
But more commonly He requires our partnership with Him in the process of Christian growth.
Our partnership is important to God because it shows that our heart is where His heart is; that we are truly growing close to God.
They shall be thorns in your side, and their gods shall be a snare to you: The announcement that the Canaanites would remain as problems to the nation was promised beforehand to Israel if they would not faithfully drive out the Canaanites
vs. 4-5 Israel Weeps
The people lifted up their voices and wept:
This emotional response of the people was very hopeful.
With all the weeping and wailing, there was reason to believe that God’s word had a deep impact upon them, and they that were on their way to a genuine revival of God’s work among them.
Sadly, it was not the case.
The subsequent record of the Book of Judges shows that this initial reaction of sorrow and repentance did not mature into a real, lasting repentance.
Real repentance shows itself in action, not necessarily in weeping.
We can be sorry about the consequences of our sin without being sorry about the sin itself.
One can weep and outwardly show repentance without ever inwardly repenting.
This is why the Lord challenged Israel in Joel 2:13: So rend your heart, and not your garments; return to the LORD your God, for He is gracious and merciful, slow to anger, and of great kindness.
It is good to see people truly weeping over their sin and it should never be discouraged.
However, “The tear is the natural drop of moisture, and soon evaporates; the better thing is the inward torrent of grief within the soul, which leaves the indelible mark within…One grain of faith is better than a gallon of tears.
A drop of genuine repentance is more precious than a torrent of weeping.”
(Spurgeon)
They sacrificed there to the LORD: In this, they did the right thing.
Any awareness of sin should drive us to God’s appointed sacrifice.
In their day that meant sin offerings of bulls and rams; in our day it means remembering God’s sacrifice for us on the cross of Jesus Christ.
And when Joshua had dismissed the people:
This shows that Judges 2 begins as retrospect, looking back to the days even before the death of Joshua (which was described in Judges 1:1).
This hopeful response to the Angel of the LORD started when Joshua was still alive.
II.
The Next Generation vs. 7-10
vs. 7-9 Served the Lord
So the people served the LORD all the days of Joshua: Joshua’s legacy was seen in the godliness of Israel during his leadership.
He was truly one of history’s great men of God.
The servant of the LORD: This is a deeply meaningful title for Joshua.
It is applied only to great men of God like Moses (Deuteronomy 34:5), and David (Psalm 18:1, title), and the courageous prophets (2 Kings 9:7).
And all the days of the elders who outlived Joshua: Israel was also faithful to God in the days of Joshua’s immediate successors.
But afterward, there arose a generation who had not seen all the great works of the LORD which He had done for Israel.
vs. 10 Did not Know the Lord
Another generation arose after them who did not know the LORD nor the work which He had done for Israel: The new generation had no personal relationship with God, and no personal awareness of His power.
God was someone who their parents related to and who did great things for their parent’s generation.
III.
Forsook the Lord vs. 11-15
vs. 11-13 Baals & Ashtoreths
The children of Israel did evil in the sight of the LORD:
Even in the days of Joshua Israel did not fully possess what they could have in the Promised Land.
Yet in that time they remained faithful to God and they did not worship the idols of the Canaanites.
After the death of Joshua, they fell into the worship of these grotesque idols.
It is strange that anyone would want to trade a personal, real, living God for a false god that is the figment of man’s imagination.
Yet there is something within man that is afraid of the exact God we need; we would rather serve a god of our own creation than the real, living God whom we can’t control.
The gods we create are the gods wanted by our sinful desires.
And served the Baals:
The Canaanite idol Baal was an attractive rival to Yahweh because he was thought to be the god over the weather and nature for the Canaanites; he was essentially the god of agricultural success.
In an agricultural society people served Baal because they wanted good weather for abundant crops and flocks.
One might say that the bottom line with Baal was the bottom line; he was effectively the god of personal wealth.
“There were also ‘Baals’ associated with particular places, like the Baal of Peor (Numbers 25:3) or Baal-Berith (Judges 9:4); and this may account for the plural form.”
(Wolf)
According to Wolf, the word Baal also meant “husband” or “owner.”
Therefore, when Israel worshipped the Canaanite god Baal, they entertained another “husband” or “owner.”
They forsook the LORD and served Baal and the Ashtoreths:
The Canaanite idol Ashtoreth was an attractive rival to Yahweh because she was thought to be the goddess of love, sex, and fertility.
She was usually honored with the practice of ritual sex with a priestess-prostitute.
One might say that the bottom line with Ashtoreth was sex and love.
“The religion of these fertility gods was accompanied by all kinds of lascivious practices, especially in Canaan, where it was found in a degraded form which even incorporated child sacrifice.”
(Cundall)
They forsook the LORD:
God made it clear that Israel’s pursuit of these gods was nothing less than forsaking the LORD God of their fathers.
Yet in all likelihood Israel did not see their idolatry as forsaking God; they probably just thought they were adding a few gods along side of the God of their fathers.
Nevertheless, the God of Israel is a jealous God who demands exclusive worship.
One Biblical illustration of our relationship with God is to describe it as a marriage relationship between husband and wife.
It would be wrong for a wife (or a husband) to add many lovers to her marriage, claiming that she simply could love them all.
A husband or wife has a righteous claim on the exclusive affection of their spouse; God has a righteous claim on our exclusive worship.
In the sight of the LORD:
This implies that the sin was even more offensive to God because it was done right before His eyes.
To give an extreme example, it is bad enough for a married person to commit adultery; but to commit adultery before the very eyes of one’s spouse would be especially offensive.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9