Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.09UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.11UNLIKELY
Fear
0.08UNLIKELY
Joy
0.68LIKELY
Sadness
0.55LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.46UNLIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.69LIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.82LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.45UNLIKELY
Extraversion
0.41UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.98LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.41UNLIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
I found this writing on the internet about our struggle with being people of faith.
Let me meet you on the mountain, Lord,
Just once.
You wouldn't have to burn a whole bush.
Just a few smoking branches
And I would surely be ...your Moses.
Let me meet you on the water, Lord,
Just once.
It wouldn't have to be on Lake Macquarie
Just on a puddle in Murray St
And I would surely be...your Peter.
Let me meet you on the road, Lord,
Just once.
You wouldn't have to blind me on Hunter Expressway.
Just a few bright Samdon St Christmas lights
And I would surely be...your Paul.
Let me meet you, Lord,
Just once.
Anywhere.
Anytime.
Just meeting you in the Word is so hard sometimes
Must I always be...your Thomas?
Doubts are something that all of God’s people have to deal with from time to time.
But make no mistake… we should not, need not, ought not to dwell in them, share them, magnify them.
Doubts are unnecessary and life sapping and joy killing.
It was doubt that closed the Zechariah’s mouth… so he met an angel, heard good news... and went home silent… and he stayed silent until after Elizabeth gives birth.
At the baby’s circumcision everyone wants to name the baby Zechariah… but Lk 1:63-64 “He asked for a writing tablet, and to everyone’s astonishment he wrote, “His name is John.”
Immediately his mouth was opened and his tongue was loosed, and he began to speak, praising God.”
Doubt (and pride) are the two sins of human beings that will keep them from both enjoying God’s wonderful blessings and singing praises to God for them.
The Contrast - Zechariah & Mary
As I said last week, Luke has a habit of putting pairs of people and incidents together so we can compare and contrast them… and see ourselves in them… and, of course, consider and make moves to change our lives.
In the second half of Lk 1, the same angel, and a similar incident some six months later…
Well, lets see what the Bible says, Lk 1:26-29.
(Read)
Same angel… and with similar news.
But this time no wise, elderly, educated priest, steeped in the law of the Lord, in the temple… but a poor, illiterate, teenage girl.
Both Zechariah and Mary have a sincere love of God, but with Mary this is not happening in the centre the temple in Jerusalem in Judea… but from an unknown, backwater village in Galilee.
Apparently it was 1962 before scholars found a reference to Nazareth that predated this angelic visit.
Nazareth is known the world over because of this visit… but it was an unknown backwater village up to this point.
The angel appeared, perhaps in her humble home and said to her… (literally) “Rejoice, be glad… highly favoured, the Lord is with you!”
Look at Mary’s reply, Lk 1:29 “29 Mary was greatly troubled at his words and wondered what kind of greeting this might be.”
How would you go with an angelic visitor to your home… presumably while you’re alone?
Mary is startled… (indeed greatly troubled) but don’t miss… “and wondered… thought, considered what the greeting might mean”.
Even here we get the picture that Mary is a woman of substance.
She’s startled… but she didn’t run.
Instead she thought, considered, pondered what she had heard.
So already we have a contrast.
A godly but elderly priest… a man, educated, in God’s holy city, in the temple… indeed the holy place
And a poor, illiterate, young girl in a backwater village in Galilee… a place mocked because it was inhabited by so many Gentiles.
About the only thing they have in common is that they are Jews who really know and love the Lord their God.
The Contrast - the Two Babies
There is also a contrast in the way the two babies are described.
And Oh my goodness, if Zechariah and Elizabeth’s child was going to be a delight, Mary’s child is unique.
Gabriel says he will be “Great… son of the Most High… he will sit on David’s throne… he will reign over God’s people forever; his kingdom will never end!”
Son of God; sit on David’s throne; reign over God’s people forever?
That’s enough to make anyone’s head spin!
Every baby is a miracle.
But this Baby… words fail!
A king… forever… from a peasant girl in nowhere town?
So here, most likely in a nondescript house in a backwater town the angel of God announces God’s central plan for the human race.
This poor, illiterate teenager, pregnant out of wedlock, will give birth without ever having known/been intimate with a man to “God become man” who comes to save the human race.
How much Mary understood of this we are not sure.
The gospel and NT writers will spend the next century understanding and explaining it for God’s people down through the centuries.
How would you go with that information if you were Mary?
How do you go now, even knowing the rest of the NT?
So many even today, even knowing things about the Man that the baby went on to become, respond with doubt.
Mate… how wet behind the ears do you think I am?
I know how babies come about…
The Response v35-45
Well, even teenage girls, even in those days, understood the biology of human reproduction.
Everyone knows women do not produce babies without having a close encounter with a man… something Mary says she has not experienced!
So she asks Gabriel, v34, a question of logistics.
“How will this be?”
She asks.
To which she receives not a judgement on her disbelief but a clarification of an honest question....
V35-37 (Read)
Well, after such an introduction there could be no other explanation for the birth… could there?
Whatever some may think about what has gone on between Mary and Joseph previous to this… the angel certainly confirms that this is the conception of a baby in a person who has integrity and tells the truth.
Luke, the author and a doctor certainly believes she conceived by the Holy Spirit.
Look at vv27 (virgin twice!)
And honestly… how else does anyone explain how this Baby would grow to be a man that healed people born blind, walked on water and raised dead people?
What explanation can they give… but that the angel spoke reality.
God the Holy Spirit will overshadow Mary and conceive the child so the “holy one to be born” will be called the Son of God.
And the angel confirms his announcement with a sign: Elizabeth is also with child… for nothing is impossible with God.
It is surprising just how much this is doubted.
Can God control the rain or the pandemic?
What about bodily resurrection?
Jesus after 3 days?
Maybe.
Maybe.
But after 3000 years buried at sea?
I doubt it!
Well, listen again to the angel.
Nothing is impossible with God.
Mary’s response must be the most glorious response to such revelation anywhere.
Behold… the handmaid of the Lord!
So here’s the next contrast.
When Elizabeth conceived, we read in v25 she was so excited that God had removed her disgrace.
Mary however could technically be stoned for conceiving a baby out of wedlock… as was stipulated in the law of Moses; although that was unknown at this time.
But she will be known as an unwed mother… and she will hear the scorn of people, even 30 years later, about this rabbi called Jesus... “we don’t even know who his father is”.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9