Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.09UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.04UNLIKELY
Fear
0.1UNLIKELY
Joy
0.56LIKELY
Sadness
0.19UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.9LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.35UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.95LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.87LIKELY
Extraversion
0.21UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.22UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.86LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
How it started
allowed Canaanites to live among them
over power them into force labor.
Accordingly, while the preface to the book is crafted in the form of a summary inscription, the genre of this chapter is transformed ironically into an anticonquest account.
Unlike most ancient military reports, the aim of this document is not to celebrate the achievements of the generation of Israelites that survived Joshua but to lament their sorry response to the divine mandate to occupy the land and to eliminate the Canaanites.
Although the author delays sermonizing on the subject (cf.
2:1–5; 2:6–3:6), the structure of the chapter declares that this military failure accounts for the disastrous history of the nation in the next two or three centuries, as it is reported in the remainder of the book.
Eighth, the author is careful to give credit for successes where credit is due.
This otherwise secular text is punctuated with two theological notes: “the LORD gave X into Y’s hands” (v.
4); “the LORD was with TN” (= tribal name; vv.
19, 22).
In fact, both Judah and Joseph achieve victory in spite of minor lapses in carrying out the divine mandate to destroy the Canaanites.30
This observation forces a modification of a common mechanistic view of the Deuteronomistic formula: obedience results in blessing; disobedience brings the curse.
On the contrary, as the author will demonstrate throughout the book, Yahweh typically operates on Israel’s behalf in mercy and grace, not in response to the people’s manifest spirituality or merit.31
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9