Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.05UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.04UNLIKELY
Fear
0.05UNLIKELY
Joy
0.57LIKELY
Sadness
0.12UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.56LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.62LIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.88LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.74LIKELY
Extraversion
0.38UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.91LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.77LIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Date: 2021-12-26
Audience: Grass Valley Corps
Title: A King is Born
Text: Matthew 1:18-25
Proposition: The virgin birth is a sign, not the point
Purpose: Believe that God is with us
Grace and peace
Happy Christmas.
18 Thisis how the birth of Jesus the Messiah came about: His mother Mary was pledged to be married to Joseph, but before they came together, she was found to be pregnant through the Holy Spirit.[1]
That’s Matthew 1:18 and our starting place for today.
Matthew has just laid out a bunch of names in a family tree leading from Abraham to Jesus.
Those names include people from the powerful to the pitiful, a sign of the people Jesus came to gather together: Everyone.
In this verse, he starts by laying out the premise he intends to spend his whole book proving: Jesus is the Messiah.
Messiah = highest of all kings / King of Kings
Figure long promised to God’s people – many scriptures point to this promised figure.
Matthew is telling us his story with an intentional focus on demonstrating that Jesus is this long-awaited King of Kings, the Messiah people had been hoping would appear for centuries.
And so he starts the story at the beginning – with the birth of Jesus, who he says is the Messiah.
We begin with the parents, who he says were pledged to be married.
Or. more specifically, who he called “betrothed.”
Let me give you a 60 second overview of marriage practices back in the day.
Marriages were usually arranged between families, often while the happy couple was still too young to really know about it.
Other times, a man of marriageable age might spot an interesting young woman of near marriageable age and get his family to approach her family.
This informal agreement was called an engagement and it was a non-binding agreement between the families that when the time came to move to the next step, they’d consider this match as having first claim, so long as nothing had come up to make one of the participants less desirable.
The next step came when both of the participants were old enough to be considered marriageable.
For young women, this was between the ages of twelve and fourteen.
By that point she would have learned the basics of running a house, which could be anything from baking bread to making textiles to managing a business to some combination of those and other things.
She brought skills to the pairing, which is what helped set the dowry payment the groom would make.
The groom was generally between 18 and 20, sometimes younger.
He would have to be established in his trade, able to earn a living for a family, provide a home for his wife-to-be within a year or so, and pay the bride price to her family.
When both families agreed the bride and groom were ready to be officially paired, a betrothal ceremony would be held.
This was legally binding and usually involved payment of some or all of the expected payment.
The couple was officially considered married, EXCEPT they each remained with their own families and they still were not permitted to see one another without chaperones.
This was especially true in Galilee, the region we are told Joseph and Mary were from.
Sex and the other benefits and responsibilities of marriage were not available to them until the final stage of marriage, which involved – usually – a big party which could last up to a week and included a fairly public consummation and acknowledgement that the bride had been delivered – umm, how to put this delicately?
– intact, prior to the groom breaking the seal, as it were.
The betrothal stage before the married stage was considered sacred, and any violation broke both religious and civil laws.
It was kind of a big deal.
Usually lasted a year while the groom prepared a place to bring his bride back to, be that acquiring or building a house or building their own room onto his parents home.
Did I get all that in in 60 seconds?
Mary and Joseph got betrothed, he went to work on making a place for her, and she went to visit her cousin Elizabeth, which you can read about in Luke’s gospel, and when she came back after several months, she was pregnant.
I know that the scripture says it was by the Holy Spirit.
And let me be clear that I believe this to be the truth, for a few reasons.
But if your fiancé showed up for your wedding pregnant and you knew you hadn’t been involved in whatever brought that up, would your thought be, “Wow, I bet this is the first time in history that God has just reached down from heaven and used asexual reproduction to create a human baby”?
Or would you think you had been betrayed?
19 Because Joseph her husband was faithful to the law, and yet did not want to expose her to public disgrace, he had in mind to divorce her quietly.
[2]
Maybe you don’t understand why he wouldn’t give her a chance – or a second chance, as it were.
It wasn’t an option!
Not in their community.
Not in their culture.
Not in their world.
Let me explain.
Jewish law demanded that he divorce her at once!
In fact, if a bride is found not to be a virgin, there was an expectation that she would be publicly charged.
It wouldn’t be much of a trial, would it?
“Your honor, Mary isn’t a virgin.”
“Your proof?”
“Look at her. She’s at least six months pregnant.”
“Guilty!”
That’s their community.
In the larger culture, this kind of thing was viewed as corruption on her part, and it brought shame to her father and their whole family.
Especially if she was betrothed, because that broke all the vows that had been made as well as the moral and legal implications.
Any groom was expected to loudly and vehemently repudiate a woman with that kind of shame attached to her.
To allow his feeling for her to sway him towards any other course would have brought that same shame on him and he would have been viewed as weak and dishonorable.
Adultery was seen as the stealing of another man’s prized possession: the undivided affections of his wife.
It was the ultimate theft, and one that demanded a response.
Legally, the situation wasn’t any better.
Roman law said he needed to divorce her immediately.
Failure to do so legally made him her pimp and he could be prosecuted as a panderer who exploited his wife as a prostitute.
So even if he wanted to – and there isn’t really any reason to think that he DID want to – staying married to Mary wasn’t a choice Joseph could make without some serious repercussions.
The best they could hope for was that people would assume he had somehow gotten her alone, away from their chaperones, and that their youthful libido had gotten he better of them and they had dishonored themselves and their families and their God and had been punished with a child to bring their sin to light.
Remember, there hadn’t been a virgin conception before.
Mary wasn’t claiming she had been raped.
Joseph knew he hadn’t slept with her.
He could only assume that she had dallied with another man.
He had no choice.
He had to divorce her.
It is a mark of his Godly character that he decided to do it quietly rather than in a showy way that would make it clear none of the shame should be attached to him.
20 But after he had considered this, an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream and said, “Joseph son of David, do not be afraid to take Mary home as your wife, because what is conceived in her is from the Holy Spirit.
21 She will give birth to a son, and you are to give him the name Jesus, because he will save his people from their sins.”[3]
Joseph got something many of us have wished for from time to time: Divine reassurance that a difficult path is the right one.
Notice what he’s promised: Mary hasn’t been unfaithful and Jesus is coming to save his people from their sins.
Sins = harmartia= missing the mark or missing the point of life, which is life together with God.
Hold onto that idea for a moment.
God telling Joseph that Mary hasn’t been unfaithful removes any legitimate reason for him to divorce her.
All of the previous challenges and dangers to their honor and positions in society remain.
But following through on making Mary his wife is the God-honoring thing to do, and we have been reassured that Joseph is a man who honors God.
The name Jesus comes from a Greek word meaning “God with him”.
In Hebrew it is “Yeshua” (Or Joshua, if you want to Americanize it), which means “the LORD delivers”.
Any way you look at it, it is related to this traditional idea of God coming to save his people.
Matthew, remember, is using his opportunity to write a biography of Jesus to show that Jesus was and is the promised Messiah.
He sees this dream and the name of Jesus as an opportunity to reinforce an important connection.
But, be careful when you listen to this.
The connection may not be entirely what you think it is.
Verses 22 and 23:
22 All this took place to fulfill what the Lord had said through the prophet: 23 “The virgin will conceive and give birth to a son, and they will call him Immanuel” w (which means “God with us”).[4]
Okay.
Why is this important?
[Pause – are there answers?]
NOT the virgin birth.
Again, I think that is an important part of the story and I believe it to be true, but it isn’t really the connection Matthew is trying to emphasize.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9