Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.13UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.08UNLIKELY
Fear
0.14UNLIKELY
Joy
0.54LIKELY
Sadness
0.52LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.41UNLIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.01UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.91LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.62LIKELY
Extraversion
0.2UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.54LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.77LIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Isaiah 7
Introduction
Isaiah’s vision, call and commission changed his life.
He now stands before the King and the Judean people to give them the message of God.
It was a very uncertain time in Judean history and Isaiah gives the message (That faith in the Lord and in His promises is the approach to life, however great the crisis.)
I. Historical Background (Vs1-2)
King Ahaz, son of Jotham and grandson of Uzziah was king of Judah.
King Rezin (King of Syria) and Pekah son of Remaliah King of Israel (Northern Kingdom) set out to attack Jerusalem, however they were not to carry out their plan.
When the news came to to the house of David ( a reference to Jerusalem and Judah that Syria and Ephraim (another name for Northern Kingdom) were joining forces in the Northern Kingdom, everyone trembled with fear like trees shaking from a storm.
II.
The Message to Isaiah (Vs 3-9)
The Lord speaks to Isaiah and tells him to take his son Shear-jashub whose name means a remnant will return and go meet King Ahaz.
What’s fascinating to me is God is sending them a promise, verified by the message and Isaiah’s son’s name.
What was the message?
The message for the King was for him to stop worrying because he did not need to fear those two burned out embers.
Those two kings were in fact plotting against him and the people but this is what the Sovereign Lord says.
“The invasion will never happen, Syria is no stronger than its capital Damascus, and Damascus was no stronger than king Rezin.
As for the Northern Kingdom within 65 years they would be crushed and completely destroyed.
Israel (Northern Kingdom ) is not stronger than its capital Samaria.”
Isaiah gave this prophecy in 734 BC, so 65 years later was 669.
Ahaz was challenged to believe what Isaiah was telling him.
Ahaz was not alive in 65 years , but he could have faith that God would fulfill both predictions, that Israel would be shattered and that the alliance of the North would not overpower Judah.
If he refused to believe he too would fall.
III.
The Rejection of the sign.
(Vs10-12)
Ahaz was told to ask the Lord for a sign.
The king could choose any miraculous work he wanted from the deepest depths to the highest heights.
This was a figure of speech a merism, that mentioned two extremes with the intention of including all the areas in between them.
With the miracle Ahaz would have confirmation that Isaiah’s prophecy was truly from the Lord.
Judah would not be defeated by the Northern Alliance.
Ahaz refused to request a sign and said he would not test God.
Sounds spiritual but the truth was he was not trusting the message that had been given to him.
How do we know that?
Because the response of Isaiah.
IV.
The Response of Isaiah.
(Vs13-25)
Obviously this is the Lord’s response given through Isaiah.
In rejecting the offer of the sign, Ahaz was rejecting the Lord.
What was the sign?
The sign would be a boy named Immanuel.
There are three elements to the sign.
First the boy would be born of a virgin, Secondly he would be raised in a time of chaos and lastly while he was a youth, the two king alliance would be broken.
(Vs16)
There are three main views on this passage.
The first view is that virgin in the Hebrew word almah can mean unmarried woman of marriable age.
Those who hold that this word just means young woman interpret that the boy of whom Isaiah wrote was conceived shortly after Isaiah spoke this message.
A young woman, a virgin married then had a baby and before he would be old enough to tell the difference between good and evil the Northern -Syrian alliance would be destroyed.
Some say this child was to born to Isaiah because of 8:1-4.
But that is not accurate because Isaiah’s child in chapter 8:1-4 was his second child and his wife was not a virgin and his child’s name was not Isaiah.
A second view is that this pertains only to the birth of Jesus and that since Isaiah spoke this prophecy to the house of David and not just Ahaz himself the sign was given to the entire kingly line and the entire nation.
However the fulfillment did not occur until Mary and Joseph’s day how does the prophecy relate to Isaiah’s point that the Northern-Syrian alliance would soon be defeated?
A third view is a combination of the two.
The prophecy is directed primarily to Ahaz regarding the destruction of the Northern Kingdom and Syrian alliance.
The almah or virgin was a virgin at the time of this writing would marry and have a baby and the baby would be young when the alliance was broken.
Centuries later the Holy Spirit would lead Matthew to quote this as a prophecy concerning the Birth of Christ.
Just as this sign would confirm to Ahaz that God would fulfill His promise of protecting Judah and breaking the alliance that sought to destroy them, He would also confirm through this sign that the Messiah was coming.
Matthew when quoting this knew that the Jews had knowledge of Isaiah’s message and that the ultimate fulfillment for Israel would come through the Messiah Jesus Christ.
It was not uncommon for Biblical prophecies to have one level of fulfillment in the immediate future and a final fulfillment many years later in the person and work of Jesus.
If my math is correct there are 22 such prophecies in Isaiah.
V.
The Coming of Assyria to Judah (Vs17-25)
God said He would send the king of Assyria to Judah.
This would be the worst attack since the 10 Northern tribes broke from the 2 Southern tribes.
From that day on Judah was troubled time on . 2 Kings 16 gives us a glimpse into what happened.
Ahaz sent word to Tiglath-Pileser king of Assyria saying he was his servant and asked for his help.
Ahaz took all of the silver and gold out of the treasuries of the House of the Lord.
The king of Assyria went to Damascus and captured all of its people.
Ahaz when he went to Damascus saw the altar there, then came back to Jerusalem and had an altar built just like the one in Damascus.
Tiglath-Pileser gave Ahaz trouble.
In Hezekiah’s reign Sennacherib king of Assyria invaded Judah who asked help from Egypt and was about to take it in 701 BC but God miraculously delivered Jerusalem.
God’s hand was in it for he would whistle for flies from Egypt and bees from Assyria.
Judah would experience deprivation and humiliation.
In that day marks a time of judgment on the nation of Judah.
Isaiah reveals to Ahaz that judgment is coming upon Judah.
Vs 9 says “If you will not believe surely you shall not be established”.
I contend it is far better to trust the Lord rather than make an alliance with unbelievers and give those unbelievers what is God’s.
That’s exactly what Ahaz did.
Faith in the Lord and His promises is the approach to life however great the crisis.
Never make an alliance with the enemy !
Trust the Lord!
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9