Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.49UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.1UNLIKELY
Fear
0.56LIKELY
Joy
0.56LIKELY
Sadness
0.6LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.65LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.54LIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.79LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.91LIKELY
Extraversion
0.04UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.59LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.67LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Introduction
Have you ever been so hurt by someone that you had such an emotional reaction that all you wanted to do was get back at them?
In fact, you may have been so angry or so hurt that to not get back at them would be unjust, unethical, down-right wrong.
This morning, we are looking at the Christian response to the person who has hurt us, angered us, betrayed us, or wronged us in some other manner.
The world would tell us to get even.
They may even use the Bible to back up their thoughts: “An eye for an eye,” they may say.
And if we are being conformed to this world, we very likely would figure out some way to get back at them.
But if we are being transformed by the renewal of our mind so that we know what God’s will is—what is good and acceptable and perfect, then we will seek to live by the verses we study today.
These verses teach us three steps to a Christ-like response when we are done wrong.
The first step is to consider.
The second is to consign.
And the final step is to conquer.
Consider
Consign
Conquer
Consider. .
.Honor and Peace
The first step in having a Christ-like response when we as Christians have been done wrong is to consider God’s will—what is good and acceptable and perfect.
In the Greek, all of these imperatives that we are reading in Romans 12:3-21 are pretty much all participles.
Now, they are considered imperatival participles—participles standing in for imperatives (commands), but I cannot disconnect them from the actual imperatives (commands) of verse 2 to not be conformed to the world, but be transformed by the renewing of the mind.
Here Paul tells us not to repay evil for evil, instead we need to give thought.
The word itself actually to think toward, or we could say, think hard.
Thus our first step is not to give in to our instinct and repay evil for evil, but instead think hard about doing the honorable thing.
We could say the morally right or morally good thing.
Now, before going further, I want us to understand something.
We are about to go into chapter 13 where Paul talks about government and submitting to government.
And the main thrust of that text is that government is God’s temporal tool for justice.
So, when we are talking here about pay-back, we are not talking about justice.
God allows for justice, but that comes by way of government.
We are talking about vengeance as we see in verse 19.
Our first step then in avoiding the sin of vengeance is to consider—long and hard—as to what is the honorable, the morally right, thing to do.
And Paul wrote that this honorable thing is honorable in the sight of all.
In other words, God has given common grace to all persons and there is still a standard of what is good and bad.
We, as Christians, are to take that into consideration.
We do not take into consideration how the world may not understand, but we do take into consideration what the world considers honorable.
Let me explain quickly.
We may, having considered what is morally good before all, decide to help the mechanic stranded on the side of the road even though he just cheated us out of hundreds of dollars on repairs we didn’t need.
The world would not understand why we would do such a thing.
Yet, they’d also find it to be good and honorable that we did.
Paul wrote that we are to live peaceably with all.
I see this directly connected with doing what is honorable.
The Greek phraseology is nearly the same: before all man, with all man.
Thus, what we ought to be considering is how our response helps us to live honorably and peacefully among those in this world.
We are not to escalate matters, but deescalate them.
Jesus said,
The world says to hate your enemy—the one who has wounded you.
The world says ignore them or repay them for what they’ve done.
Jesus says engage them by loving them, greeting them, and helping them.
Otherwise, you’re no better than those who are do not know him.
We are to be perfect.
Same word Paul used: “be transformed by the renewing of your mind that by testing you may discern what the will of God is—what is good, acceptable, and perfect.”
And what testing it is when someone has wounded you so deeply!
Consign. .
.Yourself and Your Situation
The first step in responding in a Christ-like manner is to consider what will help you live honorably and peaceably among those in the world.
The second step is to consign yourself and your situation to God.
The only way we can beat the temptation to avenge ourselves is to consign ourselves and our situations to God and allow him to handle it.
I love the fact that Paul uses the word “Beloved” here; it’s a term of endearment.
He knows that this is not easy.
Everything in us is telling us to fight back, hold a grudge, make them pay.
Yet the renewed mind—the Christian mindset—is to consign the self and the situation to God.
If we do this, we are being transformed into the image of his Son.
Notice those words at the end of verse 23: “But continued entrusting himself (consigning himself) to him who judges justly.”
Like Jesus, we must learn to turn everything over to him who judges justly.
He is our example, Peter wrote.
We are to follow in his steps.
The world tells us that justice delayed is justice denied but the Word tells us that justice is never denied with God.
The world tells us that sometimes we must take matters into our own hands but the Word says we must take these matters out of our hands and consign them into his.
Never avenge yourselves.
The original says “Leave room for wrath.”
And Paul quotes a verse stating God’s possession and promise.
“Vengeance is mine.”
That’s his possession.
It belongs to him.
Therefore to take vengeance on our own is to wrest it away from God to whom it belongs.
We steal what rightfully belongs to God. “I will repay.”
That’s his promise.
We should note that this is future.
We don’t know when that payment will come.
It’s a future promise.
We may want the payback now, but God’s promise is that the person who has done evil to us will not get away with it.
He will repay.
But I do think that we miss the fact that God says, “I will repay.”
We tend to focus on the future aspect rather than the personal aspect.
In inflected languages like Greek, Spanish, or even Hebrew, the pronouns are built into the verbs.
There’s no need for a pronoun like there is in English.
“He hit the ball.”
We can’t just say, “Hit the ball.”
Who hit the ball?
He hit the ball?
She hit the ball?
It hit the ball?
Or are we ordering you to hit the ball?
Inflected languages already have the he within the word.
They don’t need to pronoun.
If the pronoun shows up with the verb, then it is often because the person wants to emphasize the person doing the action, even more than the action.
“I will repay.”
The pronoun I is actually part of the sentence; Paul and the original writer Moses quoting God himself, are all emphasizing that it is God and no one else who is to repay the evil done.
Only God and no one else has the right to do so.
Only God and no one else is just enough to extend the wrath that is due.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9