Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.13UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.08UNLIKELY
Fear
0.12UNLIKELY
Joy
0.5LIKELY
Sadness
0.59LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.68LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.16UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.89LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.61LIKELY
Extraversion
0.05UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.31UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.6LIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
This is a continuation from last week’s message.
This series of messages is designed to answer the question, “Why do I, personally, only use the KJV and why do I, as pastor, continue to lead SCBC to use only the KJV?”
My personal stated position and the stated position of SCBC is
We believe that God inspired His Word in the original languages and
We believe that God has preserved His Word through the ages so that we can confidently say, “Thus saith the Lord,” and
We believe that God has preserved His Word, for English speaking people, in the KJV.
Last week, I ended my message with:
The issue that we will be considering, really isn’t an issue of the translation.
Why?
Because of the text each is translated from.
The KJV is translated from a different underlying text than the other translations.
The KJV has been translated from what is called the Textus Receptus (the received text).
The other Bibles have been translated from what is called the Westcott-Hort Text which is based upon two specific texts, the Codex Sinaiticus and the Codex Vaticanus.
Allow me to show you two examples of this:
Westcott Hort Mark 1:1
Stephens Mark 1:1
Moving to the end of the book of Mark:
The Textus Receptus includes all 20 verses of Mark chapter 16. (I didn’t create slides of that since I couldn’t fit all of those verses onto one slide.)
I want to show you, though, how both the Codex Vaticanus and Codex Sinaticus end Mark chapter 16. (These are the two Greek manuscripts which Westcott Hort based their Greek text of 1881 upon; which is the foundation of the modern translations.)
Regardless of what translation you have, take a moment to turn to Mark chapter 16.
Give particular attention to vs. 8.
What is the last word of vs. 8?
Codex Vaticanus Mark chapter 16
Codex Sinaticus Mark chapter 16
So, just from this example, it should be easy to understand that it is not merely a question of comparing the different translations to see which one is best, etc. No, we must look at the actual Greek texts which serve as the foundations of the translations.
Note: This may come up later but it is “interesting” to note that the CEB (Common English Bible) with Apocrypha states, about the ending of Mark:
“In most critical editions of the Greek New Testament, the Gospel of Mark ends at 16:8.”
What’s interesting about that is the fact that every single Greek manuscript contain Mark chapter 16:9-20.
Only the Sinaiticus and the Vaticanus have it omitted!
Out of 620 Greek Mark 16’s in existence, 618 of them have verses 9-20.
That’s 99.677% of Greek manuscripts!
However, before we continue, there are other issues that need to be considered:
The Devil hates God’s Word!
Turn to and read Genesis 3:1-7.
Although the Devil hates God’s Word, he also knows that he cannot defeat God’s Word.
So, his method of attack is simply:
The Devil seeks to instill doubt of God’s Word!
We see this very clearly in Genesis 3:1 when the serpent asks:
“Yea, hath God said...”
Again, the Devil knows that he cannot defeat God’s Word so his method of attack has remained the same throughout history:
To get people to doubt God’s Word or to doubt that they have God’s Word!
With that, I point to the footnotes that many of Bibles include when you get to Mark chapter 16 verses 9-20:
Some of the earliest manuscripts do not include 16:9-20.
Does a statement like that instill confidence or doubt?
If we are honest, we would say that those types of statements instill more doubt than they do confidence!
Even Westcott and Hort, the creators of the Greek text underlying the modern versions, were uncertain of their own accuracy.
Included in the explanatory notes of their Greek text they wrote:
“But it is at least theoretically possible that the originality of the text thus attained is relative only, and that all existing documents are affected by errors introduced in the early stages of transmission.”
Dr. Charles Surrett, who wrote the book “Certainty Of the Words,” said:
“Surely, such a low level of confidence in the accuracy of the text on the part of those who assembled it would undermine their reader’s confidence in God and His Word.”
I believe that God would want us, as Christians, to have confidence that the book which we hold in our hand is the Word of God!
However, once doubt is embedded in the mind and heart of an individual, it is much easier for them to continue moving away from the truth.
Consider this warning which the Apostle Paul gave to the church in Galatia:
What was one of the ways in which these 1st century antichrists were able to lure young Christians away from the truth?
By altering the text!
Wilbur Pickering, in his book, “The Identity of the New Testament Tex,” wrote:
“The apostolic writings themselves contain strong complaints and warnings against heretical and malicious activity.
Large sections of the extant [still in existence] writings of the early Fathers are precisely and exclusively concerned with combating the heretics.
It is clear that during the second century, and possibly already in the first, such persons produced many copies of N.T. writings incorporating their alterations.”
He goes on to write:
“Gaius, an orthodox Father who wrote near the end of the second century, named four heretics who not only altered the text but had disciples who multiplied copies of their efforts.”
We must always remember that the Devil hates - HATES - God’s Word and while he knows that he cannot defeat it he knows that he can do a tremendous amount of damage by getting people to doubt God’s Word.
“Yea, hath God said?”
One last thing that I want you to consider this evening is this:
We are told...
Listen to the scholars.
This is what most people might consider my “achilles heal.”
I am not a scholar.
I have no formal training in Biblical languages.
I only have a 4 year bachelor’s degree in youth ministries with a minor in sacred music (vocal emphasis).
I only took 1 year of Greek.
The only Greek that I can remember is...
“Behold, my woman!”
However, I want to remind you of what the Apostle Paul wrote to the Corinthians:
Turn to and read 1 Corinthians 1:23-29
Also, turn over to 1 Corinthians 3:18-21
In a conversation that I recently had with a close friend of mine who is on the Bible faculty at Pensacola Christian College, he said:
“My conclusion is that God’s people filled God’s Spirit should be expected to recognize God’s Word.”
In other words: You don’t need to be a scholar and you don’t need a scholar!
I would also point out:
During the Dark Ages, who “had” the Word of God?
It was the scholars, the learned, the priests of the Catholic church.
The people were told they had to listen to the scholars; that they could not read God’s Word for themselves.
In some aspects, we have a similar situation facing us today!
Prayer Requests:
Pauline - mistreatment and betrayal
Angie - lost car, lost job, broke, 3 deaths in a month
Paul - his wife died
Mark - feeling confused
Denise - feeling alone
Stewart - has hated himself for 55 years
Lori McAlister (on the prayer list) passed away on Saturday night due to a bowel blockage.
Pray for her family.
Donnie Stanford (4-5 year old that passed away on Monday) - Sunday he had a stomach ache and didn’t come to church, he died Monday the funeral was Tues.
Have to bury within 24 hrs because they do not embalm.
So appendicitis, intestinal blockage, food poisoning.
They don’t investigate that stuff.
Just really sad.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9