Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.09UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.09UNLIKELY
Fear
0.08UNLIKELY
Joy
0.56LIKELY
Sadness
0.49UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.67LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.57LIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.93LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.36UNLIKELY
Extraversion
0.45UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.28UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.54LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Overview
The cleansing of the leper, the healing of the paralytic and the call of Levi all work together to introduce a new element to the ministry of Jesus. the Pharisees.
Pharisees
The sect likely changed in form and function over time
Members of a Jewish party that exercised strict piety according to Mosaic law.
The Pharisees were a sect within early Judaism, becoming active around 150 BC and enduring as a distinct party until being subsumed into the Rabbinic movement around AD 135.
Although Luke’s Gospel shares much material with Matthew and Mark, he provides a number of unique accounts of the Pharisees—many of which provide a slightly less decisive view of the Pharisees.
The Pharisees first appear in Luke 5:17–26 during the healing of the paralytic, when Jesus uses the physical healing of the paralytic to demonstrate His authority in forgiving sins.
The scribes and Pharisees respond with charges of blasphemy (Luke 5:21).
However, Luke also notes that the entire assembly is awed by the healing of the paralytic (Luke 5:26).
Luke includes several accounts of Jesus interacting with Pharisees and using them as negative examples in His teaching.
In Luke 7:36, Jesus dines with a Pharisee.
When a sinful woman anoints His feet, Jesus offers a parable in which He contrasts the gratitude and hospitality of the woman with that of His host (the Pharisee; Luke 7:37–50).
When Jesus dines at the home of a Pharisee another time, the meal serves as a channel through which He offers a corrective to Pharisaic rules governing the Sabbath.
This establishes a series of contrasts between the Pharisees and their antitheses: tax collectors and sinners.
Jesus portrays this contrast by comparing the prayers of the Pharisee and the tax collector (Luke 18:10–14), and in His parables of “lost things” (Luke 15:1–32).
In the parable of the Prodigal Son, the dutiful son seems to exemplify the pious Pharisees, whereas the prodigal son represents the repentant sinner.
Jesus’ encounters with the Pharisees provide insights into the nature of some of their members.
Luke records that they rejected the baptism of John (Luke 7:29–30).
He also characterizes them as “lovers of money” (Luke 16:14).
At the same time, however, at least some of the Pharisees seemed to have been curious about Jesus: they ask Him when the kingdom of God is to be expected (Luke 17:20), and some of them even warn Jesus of Herod’s plot to seize Him (Luke 13:31).
The Good
Daily Life focused.
God first - through scripture - then actions.
didn’t mingle Judaism with Hellenism/secularism
Focused on the common people.
Lived in the marketplace not the temple.
The Bad
Daily rituals lost the message of the Scripture
Power - through scripture - evidenced in action.
Using our piety for political influence and self advancement.
Used the scripture to enact influence over the common people.
Visited the market with the intention of drawing attention to their self righteousness.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9