Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.05UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.04UNLIKELY
Fear
0.06UNLIKELY
Joy
0.11UNLIKELY
Sadness
0.11UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.77LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.03UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.29UNLIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.31UNLIKELY
Extraversion
0.01UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.22UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.63LIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
John 9:13-34
Blindness and Sight – Part 2
I.
The predicament of unbelief (vv.
13-16)
A. The setting revealing unbelief (vv.
13-14)
1.
The Pharisees (v.
13)
2. The Sabbath (v.
14)
B. The investigation revealing unbelief (v.
15)
1.
The questioning by the Pharisees (v.
15a)
2. The response by the blind man (v.
15b)
C. The division caused by unbelief (v.
16)
II.
The obstinance of unbelief (vv.
17-23)
A. The examination of the blind man (v.
17)
B. The denial of the Jews (v.
18)
C. The anxiety of the parents (vv.
19-23)
1.
The interrogation by the Jews (vv.
19-21)
2. The intimidation of the Jews (vv.
22-23)
III.
The belligerence of unbelief (vv.
24-27)
A. The manipulation by the Pharisees (v.
24)
B. The observation of the blind man (v.
25)
C. The repetition of the question (v.
26)
D. The mockery by the blind man (v.
27)
IV.
The arrogance of unbelief (vv.
28-34)
A. The reviling of the bind man (vv.
28-29)
1.
Who the Pharisees follow (v.
28)
2. What the Pharisees know (v.
29)
B. The response of the blind man (vv.
30-33)
1.
His amazement (v.
30)
2. His logic (v.
31)
3. His assessment (v.
32)
4. His conclusion (v.
33)
C. The removal of the blind man (v.
34)
1
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9