Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.07UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.45UNLIKELY
Fear
0.03UNLIKELY
Joy
0.06UNLIKELY
Sadness
0.11UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.67LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.7LIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.55LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.33UNLIKELY
Extraversion
0.08UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.41UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.65LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
John 7:25-36
Responses to Jesus
I.
The confusion of the people (vv.
25-29)
A. The people’s observations (vv.
25-27)
1. Concerning Jesus’ identity (v.
25)
2. Concerning the rulers’ response (v.
26)
3. Concerning their own knowledge (v.
27)
B. The Savior’s response (vv.
28-29)
1. Concerning himself (v.
28a-d)
2. Concerning the people (v.
28e)
3. Concerning his Father (v.
29)
II.
The division of the people (vv.
30-32)
A. The malice of some of the people (v.
30)
B. The supposition of some of the people (v.
31)
C. The response of the leadership (v.
32)
III.
The contempt of the people (vv.
33-36)
A. The statement by Jesus (vv.
33-34)
1. Concerning himself (v.
33)
2. Concerning the people (v.
34)
B. The response of the Jews (vv.
35-36)
1.
A wrong conjecture (v.
35)
2. A disdainful restatement (v.
36)
1
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9