Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.08UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.07UNLIKELY
Fear
0.07UNLIKELY
Joy
0.68LIKELY
Sadness
0.55LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.51LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.84LIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.78LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.84LIKELY
Extraversion
0.16UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.82LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.53LIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Good Has Overcome Evil—And Still Does
2.20.22 [Romans 12:14-21] River of Life (7th Sunday after Epiphany)
My religion is very simple.
My religion is kindness.
It sounds like the kind of thing that the Apostle Paul would say, especially after reading Romans 12.
In Romans 12, Paul calls for a (Rm.
12:9) sincere kind of love.
Paul strives to (Rm.
12:16) live in harmony and (Rm.
12:18) peace with a wide array of people—not just friends and family and people of his own socio-economic status, but (Rm 12:18) everyone.
Complete strangers, the poor and destitute, and even chronic enemies.
Paul encourages his readers to not just find a way to deal with the people who are out to get you, but to actively (Rm.
12:14) bless them.
Paul implores his Roman brothers ands sisters even to (Rom 12:20) meet the material needs of their enemies.
Again and again, Paul encourages kindness and love from God’s people.
Kindness is important.
In every relationship.
Paul drives that point home in many ways.
But Paul did not say his religion is kindness.
Based on these words from Romans 12, Paul would not pin his eternal hope on his own kindness.
Kindness is important to Paul, but it is not the matter of supreme importance.
If it were, kindness would die on the vine.
Rather the one who most famously describes his religion as kindness is the Buddhist spiritual leader known as the Dalai Lama.
And so much of what Paul advocates for here, the Dalai Lama would agree with.
As would Gandhi.
And the Mormons who live down your street.
In fact, just about every world religion says that kindness is really important.
Even people who are totally irreligious will rejoice when they see people committing random acts of kindness.
Just about everyone recognizes the impact, the value, & the transcendence of kindness.
So why is it so rare?
Why is it so hard to be kind?
Being kind is good.
Being kind makes a difference.
We want to believe that is true.
But how do we know?
How can we be sure?
The Scriptures have clear answers to each of these questions.
Look at the practices of kindness Paul encourages here.
This is rare stuff, right?
It’s hard to do! (Rm.
12:14) Blessing those who persecute you?
When someone has it out for you, don’t you just want to fight fire with fire, even though you know it’s not kind, not right, not good?
(Rom.
12:19) Revenge may not be good, but sometimes it feels good.
(Rm.
12:20) Actively helping your enemies?
When someone who has hurt you is struggling, don’t you just feel like they finally got what’s coming to them?
Being kind to those who have hurt you, those who have wronged you is hard to do.
(Rm.
12:15) Rejoice with the rejoicers.
Mourn with the mourners.
Put yourself alongside people who are struggling.
Be so in tune with what others are experiencing that you can sit alongside them in good days and in bad.
Celebrate when others receive blessings—and you don’t.
Be delighted when others are successful—and you aren’t.
Be genuinely happy for people when their happiness doesn’t benefit you.
That’s hard!
It doesn’t come easily.
Neither does the flip side.
When someone is mourning, sad, grieving, or even depressed—and you’re not—don’t you just want to break them out of their funk?
Don’t you just want them to laugh or smile?
Don’t you feel uncomfortable just being with someone who is in the depths of despair?
Being kind to someone who is sad—mourning with the mourners—is hard work.
It’s rare.
So, too, is associating with those of lower position.
Being humble and hospitable.
Sometimes, we don’t know how to associate with people of lower position, because we haven’t a clue what life is like for them.
Other times, we know from experience what life like that is like—and we’ve worked hard to pull ourselves up.
Being kind to folks who don’t work hard is hard work.
Being kind to people who have created so many of their own problems is problematic.
Notice Paul isn’t saying: Give them a taste of the good life so that they’ll want to better themselves.
He says lower yourself.
Roll up your sleeves and rub elbows with them.
That’s hard.
What Paul says here is good.
And it is hard.
Most people—whether they’re an Atheist, Mormon, or Buddhist—would acknowledge that what Paul is saying here is simultaneously a noble and a difficult thing.
Why is that?
The atheist might say we are not kind because we are ignorant.
Our lizard brains lead us to view everyone else as competition.
If we understood that being kind wasn’t a threat to our own survival or happiness, we’d be kind.
The Mormon would use more familiar Biblical imagery, but their conclusion isn’t much different.
We struggle to be kind because we are aiming toward inferior, selfish goals.
We just need to know where to aim—how to be kind—and then, with enough practice, we will do it right.
The Buddhist might say that we just need to understand how interconnected we all are.
If we could see in our enemies, in those of lower position, in the rejoicers and the mourners how we are all the same, then we would be kind.
We just need to be enlightened.
Each of them believes that the good that overcomes evil is within you.
It needs to be educated, directed, or enlightened.
And that’s hogwash.
And you know it.
If it were a matter of education, or direction, or enlightenment you’d make progress.
There would be this aha moment, this instance when you got the sight dialed in and you’re nailing your mark, this light-bulb that turned on and suddenly you see everything and everyone differently.
Paul offers a different explanation.
He says by nature we are all (Rm.
7:14) slaves to sin—totally incapable of doing any of these things unless we think somehow they will benefit us.
He says even when I want to be kind, sometimes—for reasons I cannot understand or explain or change—I just don’t do it.
Even when I have the desire to be a kind person, I don’t always do kind things.
Even though I hate the idea of being rude or proud, antagonistic or quick-tempered, judgmental or vengeful, I keep behaving this way.
Paul does not say—like the atheist, the Mormon, or the Buddhist—that good is within me.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9