Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.19UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.09UNLIKELY
Fear
0.1UNLIKELY
Joy
0.58LIKELY
Sadness
0.55LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.87LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.83LIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.87LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.2UNLIKELY
Extraversion
0.01UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.45UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.36UNLIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Question 27
Are all people, just as they were lost through Adam, saved through Christ?
No, only those who are elected by God and united to Christ by faith.
Nevertheless God in his mercy demonstrates common grace even to those who are not elect, by restraining the effects of sin and enabling works of culture for human well-being.
Romans 5:17
For if, because of one man’s trespass, death reigned through that one man, much more will those who receive the abundance of grace and the free gift of righteousness reign in life through the one man Jesus Christ.
Election.......this is big concept that is objectionable to many...
First, is the issue of election a primary or secondary issue?
Trick question.
The fact is that God elects.
The question is on what basis does he do so.
I think the fact of election is crystal clear.
I think the basis of why/how he does so is a secondary issue.
So if someone has a different take on it than I, will I count him as an unbeliever?
no.
Let me say something about labels for a moment.
I don’t like them.
People want to wear Calvinist, or Arminian, or Reformed, or whatever like a badge of some kind.
Some labels are helpful, in that they communicate in a shorthand manner what someone might believe, but when you start to call that label after a man, I get really uncomfortable because I feel like Paul directly addresses that in 1 Cor
“I’m of Paul, I’m of Apollos, I’m of Cephas, I’m of Christ”
I’m of Calvin, I’m of Arminius....
So that bothers me.
But, nevertheless, these doctrines have come under these labels.
To which I say, what does the text say.
Forget about Calvin, forget about Arminius, what does the Bible say.
Forget about what I want it to say, what does it say.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9