Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.15UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.11UNLIKELY
Fear
0.08UNLIKELY
Joy
0.47UNLIKELY
Sadness
0.28UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.9LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.34UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.58LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.65LIKELY
Extraversion
0UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.34UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.85LIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
John 10:32-42
Jesus, the Son of God
I.
The accusation against the Son of God (vv.
32-33)
A. Jesus’ question (v.
32)
1. “I am showing you the Father’s works…”
2. “for which of these works do you stone me?”
B. The Jew’s answer (v.
33)
1.
Not for the works…
2. But for blasphemy.
II.
The answer of the Son of God (vv.
34-38)
A. His answer from the law (vv.
34-36)
1.
The basis of his answer (v.
34)
2. The logic of his answer (vv.
35-36)
a.
If God called Israel “gods” … (v.
35)
b.
Then Jesus can be called the “Son of God” (v.
36)
1) The set-apart Son
2) The sent Son
B. His answer from his works (vv.
37-38)
1. Expressed negatively (v.
37)
a.
If he doesn’t do God’s works…
b.
Then don’t believe
2. Expressed positively (v.
38a)
a.
If he does do God’s works…
b.
Then believe the evidence of the works.
3. Expressed purposefully (vv.
38b)
a.
That they may know…
b.
That they may believe…
c.
That Jesus and the Father are one.
III.
The response to the Son of God (vv.
39-42)
A. A response of unbelief (vv.
39-40)
1.
The sinfulness of the Jews (v.
39a)
2. The sovereignty of the Son (vv.
39b-40)
B. A response of belief (vv.
41-42)
1.
The people seeking the truth (v.
41)
2. The people trusting the Truth (v.
42)
1
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9