Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.51LIKELY
Disgust
0.14UNLIKELY
Fear
0.12UNLIKELY
Joy
0.54LIKELY
Sadness
0.47UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.6LIKELY
Confident
0.02UNLIKELY
Tentative
0UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.93LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.78LIKELY
Extraversion
0.32UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.65LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.79LIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Today we walk a theological tightrope.
Jesus said that we are not to judge [Matthew 7.1ff].
But he also said we are to judge those who claim to proclaim the truth by the fruit thy bear [Matthew 7.15ff].
In today's text, James echoes the former while practicing the latter.
The issue, according to James, is quite straightforward.
To slander is to judge; to judge is to usurp God's authority.
To slander is to judge.
The word literally means to speak evil or ill of.
Barclay says it carries the idea of defaming others behind their backs with no opportunity for the accused to defend themselves.
It often appears in tandem with gossip, but is a bit different.
Gossip is to carry tales while slander is to malign someone’s character as judge and jury.
In the church’s Jewish heritage, to slander another was to slander God.
The man who slanders finally denies even God.
(R Asi)
It is a besetting sin of humankind
[Rom 1.30] so its appearance in the church [2 Cor 12.20] should be no surprise.
He said to me, Be simple and guileless, and you will be as the children who know not the wickedness that ruins the life of men.
First, then, speak evil of no one, nor listen with pleasure to any one who speaks evil of another.
But if you listen, you will partake of the sin of him who speaks evil, if you believe the slander which you hear; for believing it, you will also have something to say against your brother.
Thus, then, will you be guilty of the sin of him who slanders.
For slander is evil and an unsteady demon.
It never abides in peace, but always remains in discord.
Keep yourself from it, and you will always be at peace with all.
Now comes the balancing act.
James told them (tells us) not to pass judgment on others even while he was calling out their bad fruit.
When Jesus said to judge the tree by its fruit, he was telling us to choose carefully who and what to listen to and be guided by.
Considering the larger context of Jesus’ words, he was telling us what happens to that tree is in God’s hands, not ours.
Intent is also a factor: Why are we speaking what we are speaking?
While the Bible places a premium on speaking the truth in love, evil intent turns the truth into something malicious.
Judging brother or sister becomes, by default, a judgment of the law.
The law can have a couple of meanings here.
It certainly can have reference to the Jewish law insofar as certain pseudo-Paulinists used grace as an excuse to live without standards altogether.
James’ emphasis was on what he called he Royal Law: Love your neighbor as yourself.
To slander is to judge one another and to judge one another is to judge the law.
To break the law is to set oneself above the law.
To set oneself above the law is to judge it not binding on the one breaking it.
To judge the law is to set oneself above the Lawgiver.
Only God is qualified to judge.
Rom Rom 14.1-4
James has returned to two of his themes.
Bad speech.
Being a hearer and not a doer.
We need to hear James’ words and follow his example.
Call out evil wherever we find it and stand against it.
Leave the evil-doer to God without joining them.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9