Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.09UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.12UNLIKELY
Fear
0.09UNLIKELY
Joy
0.67LIKELY
Sadness
0.16UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.62LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.69LIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.87LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.64LIKELY
Extraversion
0.35UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.82LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.64LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
all right, the
Question of the day is who wrote that to the lyrics to that song Anybody know?
Who said that when he said that when he got it, right?
St. Patrick, Maiwand of Ireland, will of Ireland being on a Hino generous term.
Good words to sing for the first day of Spring, right?
After Saint.
Patrick's Day Christ.
Be all around the island.
B, you to stand for the reading of God's word today.
As we read in the book of 1st Corinthians 1st Corinthians, 7:1 and following Can I say one First Corinthians 7:1 and following?
I will read aloud.
You can follow along.
How about that?
Now concerning the matters about which you wrote?
It is good for a man, not have sexual relations with a woman.
But because of the temptation to sexual immorality, each man should have his own wife and each woman her own husband.
The husband should give to his wife.
Her conjugal rights and likewise the wife to her husband.
Or the wife does not have authority over her own body.
But the husband does likewise, the husband does not have authority over his own body.
But the wife does do not deprive one another except perhaps by agreement for a limited time so that you may devote devote yourself to prayer but then come together again, so that Satan may not tempt you because of your lack of self-control.
David Concepcion, not a command.
I say this.
I wish that all wear as I myself am.
But each has his own gift from God.
One of what kind and one of another do the unmarried and of the Widow's, I say that it is good for them to remain single as I am.
But if they cannot exercise self-control, they should marry for it is better to marry than to burn with passion.
Do the married, I give this charge, not I but the Lord, the white should not separate from her husband.
But if she does, she should remain unmarried or else be reconciled to her husband.
And the husband should not divorce his wife to the rest.
I say, I not the Lord that if any brother has a wife.
Who is a non-believer and she consents to live with him?
He should not divorce her.
If any woman has a husband who was an unbeliever and he consents to live with her.
She should not divorce him for the unbelieving.
Husband is made holy because of his wife and the unbelieving wife is made.
Holy because of her husband.
Otherwise, your children would be unclean.
But as it is their Holy, One of the unbelieving partner separates, let it be.
So, in such cases, the brother or sister is not enslaved.
God is called you two piece.
For how do you know wife, whether you will save your husband or how do you know, husband whether you will save your wife?
This is God's word.
I invite you to go ahead and take your seats maybe Buckle in.
Did the parents in the room?
I say this.
You read the passage.
I'm going to preach the passage.
Respond accordingly.
What is scarce in the desert on rhetoric of question?
What is scarce in the desert?
Water.
What else? who'd like, what else?
Anything green trees.
People.
Oh wait, no.
Common sense because, you know, my friends who live in Phoenix.
Just teasing.
How about a rainforest?
Not not much of the same as scarce in a rainforest as in a desert.
Is it?
If you came upon this in a desert, let's say We Came Upon A Grove and cultivated trees and this was growing upon it and you were by yourself stranded in this desert.
What could you reasonably conclude about this fruit?
It's edible.
It's good for you.
You should eat it because you're alone in the desert, you're stranded and you need to survive.
I would have this tree was in a rainforest.
If You Came Upon A Grove of trees like this in a rainforest.
Would your conclusion be similar?
Was the Conquistadors when they went to a certain part of his actually, an island near Central America, they found these trees and they concluded that they would be fantastic to eat.
What they didn't know, is that the same fruit would be used against them when darts were dipped in them and shot at them?
If it would in fact, poison them because this is a death Apple.
A death Apple.
Is he what is rare in a desert?
It's not rare in a rainforest.
If you were to plant a garden.
Her after you should know that Garden flourishing is going to be used as an, a euphemism, a euphemism.
You know, that means good if you don't good.
If you were to plant this Garden in a rainforest, you would have to not just plant a couple of seeds and Let It Go, no, because rainforest contrary to popular belief that actually have really bad soil, for most things because they constantly have plants vying for the nutrients, in the soil, and sucking it up and depleting the soil.
So, first, you have to cut down all the trees.
You would have to clear all of the stumps, you would have to enrich the soil and then you would have to have a thriving plant or Grove or garden growing to keep the rainforest from encroaching upon.
The very vide for nutrients in the soil.
You see, currents?
With a rainforest.
For sexual exploitation.
And experimentation.
Anything you wanted, you could get in Corinth.
It wasn't to, a prudish sort of desert where any kind of proper sexual relationship.
Could Thrive rather.
It was a rainforest where to live properly you would have to cut down the trees.
So to speak, dig up the stumps and enrich the soil, just to keep The rainforest from encroaching upon your garden.
So, the Corinthians spiritual people that they were decided that the best decision to stay away from the encroaching, rainforest would simply be to not eat anything plant-based.
They would have stained from all sexual relationships so that they didn't have to deal with all of that.
They had super spiritual experiences, and they thought themselves, super spiritual people.
So they thought that is such a fleshy kind of a thing to do to have sex.
We're just not going to do it at all.
They were probably referring to in their mind, the sayings of Jesus like in Matthew 22:35.
Matthew, 22:37
We're in the resurrection.
They neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like angels in heaven.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9