Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.12UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.65LIKELY
Fear
0.07UNLIKELY
Joy
0.56LIKELY
Sadness
0.56LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.54LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.23UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.9LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.63LIKELY
Extraversion
0.18UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.66LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.78LIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
John 5:1–9 (ESV)
John 5:1.
After this there was a feast of the Jews, and Jesus went up to Jerusalem.
5:1.
John repeatedly ties his narrative to various Jewish feasts: cf.
2:13 (Passover); 6:4 (Passover); 7:2 (Tabernacles); 10:22 (Dedication); 11:55 (Passover).
This is the only one that is not identified more precisely.
John does not specify which Jewish feast is the occasion for Jesus’ trip to Jerusalem, although some manuscripts have “the feast,” which would mean the Feast of Tabernacles, as in Jewish tradition (not Passover).
But the real issue for this narrative is that the day on which Jesus heals is a sabbath (5:9b).
John 5:2.
Now there is in Jerusalem by the Sheep Gate a pool, in Aramaic called Bethesda, which has five roofed colonnades
5:2.
Although scholars do not agree on the site of Bethesda (or its exact spelling), the site most scholars currently favor is under St. Anne’s Monastery in Jerusalem.
This site had two twin pools, surrounded by four porches, or porticoes, and one porch down the middle separating the pools.
Although John writes after Jerusalem was destroyed in 70, his recollection of the site is accurate.
‘Bethesda’ is the Greek transliteration of the Hebrew bêṯ ’ešdâ, ‘house of outpouring’;
John 5:3.
In these lay a multitude of invalids—blind, lame, and paralyzed.
5:3.
This site was later used as a pagan healing shrine; given the ancient tendency to reuse older shrines, the Jewish community in Jesus’ day probably viewed this pool as a place of healing.
The temple authorities undoubtedly did not approve—after all, sacred pools at healing shrines characterized Greek cults like that of Asclepius—but popular religion often ignores religious contradictions that are clearer to the official religious leaders.
John 5:4.
One man was there who had been an invalid for thirty-eight years.
5:4.
This verse may not be original (see notes in most translations) but was probably added early by a scribe familiar with the tradition of healing at Bethesda; it explains the otherwise enigmatic verse 7.
John 5:5.
When Jesus saw him lying there and knew that he had already been there a long time, he said to him, “Do you want to be healed?”
5:5.
The man had been sick there longer than many people in antiquity lived—for about as many years as Israel had wandered in the wilderness.
Ancient reports of healings often specified how long the person had been sick to emphasize the greatness of the healer’s cure.
Obviously nothing else, including this pool, had succeeded in restoring him.
“Do you want to get well?”
John 5:6-9.
The sick man answered him, “Sir, I have no one to put me into the pool when the water is stirred up, and while I am going another steps down before me.”
Jesus said to him, “Get up, take up your bed, and walk.”
And at once the man was healed, and he took up his bed and walked.
Now that day was the Sabbath.
5:6–9a.
In 2:6 and 3:5, Jesus replaces the water of ceremonial purification; in 4:13–14, he replaces the “holy water” of a Samaritan holy site.
Here he, not the supposedly healing waters, restores the man.
The Gospel according to John (1.
The Healing at the Pool of Bethesda (5:1–15))
5:7.
The invalid apparently held to a popular belief that the first person into the pool after the waters had been disturbed, and only the first person, would be miraculously healed.
He tries to avoid difficulties with the authorities by blaming the one who has healed him (v.
11); he is so dull he has not even discovered his benefactor’s name (v. 13); once he finds out he reports Jesus to the authorities (v.
15).
In this light, v. 7 reads less as an apt and subtle response to Jesus’ question than as the crotchety grumblings of an old and not very perceptive man who thinks he is answering a stupid question.
As in 4:11, 15, kyrie means no more than a civil ‘Sir’.
In terms of initiative, quick-wittedness, eager faith and a questing mind, this invalid is the painful opposite of everything that characterizes the wonderful character in John 9.
John 5:9–18 (ESV)
John 5:9-10.
And at once the man was healed, and he took up his bed and walked.
Now that day was the Sabbath.
So the Jews said to the man who had been healed, “It is the Sabbath, and it is not lawful for you to take up your bed.”
5:9a.
‘Just as the thirty-eight years prove the gravity of the disease, so the carrying of the bed and the walking prove the completeness of the cure’ (Barrett, p. 254).
5:9b–10.
Biblical rules forbade work on the sabbath, even so much as gathering wood for a fire (Num 16:32).
By Jesus’ day, Jewish law explicitly forbade carrying things on the sabbath, viewing this as a form of work.
John 5:11-13.
But he answered them, “The man who healed me, that man said to me, ‘Take up your bed, and walk.’
” They asked him, “Who is the man who said to you, ‘Take up your bed and walk’?”
Now the man who had been healed did not know who it was, for Jesus had withdrawn, as there was a crowd in the place.
5:11–13.
The man defends himself by blaming the one who told him to do it.
5:11–13.
Many teachers also forbade minor cures—physicians’ cures not necessary to save a life—on the sabbath.
That Jesus acts in God’s name with a miracle rather than a physician’s cure should make that discussion irrelevant; but law is often argued by analogy, and these particular authorities reason that Jesus’ cure is just like a physician’s cure.
John 5:14.
Afterward Jesus found him in the temple and said to him, “See, you are well!
Sin no more, that nothing worse may happen to you.”
5:14.
The man may have been in the temple for worship.
In the Bible sufferings were sometimes (not always—cf.
9:2–3; e.g., 2 Sam 4:4; 1 Kings 14:4; 2 Kings 13:14) judgment for sin (e.g., 1 Kings 13:4; 2 Kings 1:4; 2 Chron 16:12).
Jesus warns of greater judgment here—the resurrection for judgment (cf.
5:29).
The Gospel according to John (1.
The Healing at the Pool of Bethesda (5:1–15))
Syntactically, the two clauses, ‘Stop sinning’ and ‘something worse may happen to you’, cannot be interpreted independently.
They are tied together: the meaning is ‘Stop sinning lest something worse happen to you’.
The unavoidable implication is that the bad thing that has already happened was occasioned by the sin which the person must not repeat.
(4) It is a commonplace in many strands of Jewish and Christian theology that suffering and tragedy are the effluent of the fall, the corollary of life lived in a fallen and rebellious universe.
In that sense, all sickness is the result of sin, but not necessarily of some specific, individual sin.
John 5:15-16.
The man went away and told the Jews that it was Jesus who had healed him.
And this was why the Jews were persecuting Jesus, because he was doing these things on the Sabbath.
5:15–16.
This man does just the opposite of the faithful healed man in 9:30–34, with whom John contrasts him.
His behavior is like those who left the churches of John’s readers and sided with their opponents, betraying them to persecution (see introduction to 1 John in this commentary).
John 5:17.
But Jesus answered them, “My Father is working until now, and I am working.”
5:17.
Everyone recognized that God had continued to work since creation, sustaining the world even on the sabbath.
Jesus reasons by analogy that what is right for God in sustaining his creation is also right for himself.
John 5:18.
This was why the Jews were seeking all the more to kill him, because not only was he breaking the Sabbath, but he was even calling God his own Father, making himself equal with God.
New Testament (5:9b–18—Betrayal on the Sabbath)
5:18.
Because Jesus appears to usurp prerogatives solely attributed to God (5:17—the right to work on the sabbath), his hearers think that he thereby claims a position equal to that of God, a claim that naturally sounds blasphemous to them.
Second-century rabbis accused many Jewish Christians of believing in two gods.
One could “annul” a biblical law by disregarding it, so they feel that Jesus is (literally) “destroying” the sabbath.
Jesus’ Relation to the Father
Jesus seeks to qualify their understanding of his relationship to the Father; far from usurping God’s honor (5:18), Jesus acts only on the Father’s authority and in conjunction with his will.
John 5:19-29.
So Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, the Son can do nothing of his own accord, but only what he sees the Father doing.
For whatever the Father does, that the Son does likewise.
For the Father loves the Son and shows him all that he himself is doing.
And greater works than these will he show him, so that you may marvel.
For as the Father raises the dead and gives them life, so also the Son gives life to whom he will.
For the Father judges no one, but has given all judgment to the Son, that all may honor the Son, just as they honor the Father.
Whoever does not honor the Son does not honor the Father who sent him.
Truly, truly, I say to you, whoever hears my word and believes him who sent me has eternal life.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9