Why pt4
Jesus came into a Jewish world that had developed a remote view of God, one that needed angels to carry messages. The people had ceased to use the name of God for fear of taking his name in vain, just like the Prodigal Son, who could speak of “heaven” but not use the name of God (cf. Luke 15:18, 21). Into this context of speaking of God by means of surrogate titles Jesus came and called God his Father. But what was even more astounding was that he taught his disciples to pray “Our Father” (cf. Matt 6:9). For the Jews of that day such a personal view of God was very degrading of God and akin to blasphemy (cf. John 5:18). Yet in spite of his personal sense of the Father’s presence, Jesus modeled for his disciples how to honor and glorify God through consistent obedience to the will of the Father. It is this wonderful sense of Jesus’ personal relationship to God that John captured in this magisterial prayer of John 17. Few passages of Scripture come so close to revealing the heart of God’s special agent as these magnificent twenty-six verses.
Suffice it to state briefly that while God’s intention is that everyone or all people should be given eternal life, receiving this bestowal is inseparably linked to knowing God and his special Son. Moreover, the God about whom the prayer speaks is not some generally defined “god” within the world of many gods. God here is defined by two specific adjectival limitations. God is, first, the one and only God; and, second, God is absolutely genuine or authentic
The issue is not the previous status of the disciples but their role in God’s mission strategy through the coming of the incarnate Jesus.
The importance of v. 6 is that the disciples have become a strategic link in God’s work. The text states that they have kept/obeyed “your word.” The verb is in the perfect tense, indicating the continuing implications of their obedience. The singular of “word” (logon) is to be understood as a collective for God’s message, the good news or the gospel, and not as a reference to individual commands of God or to the teachings of Jesus
The disciples of Jesus had not been and would not be perfect models of consistently following Jesus, but Jesus knew their hearts. Peter is a good example of inconsistency in the sword episode (18:10–11), the denial (18:15–27), and the recommissioning (21:20–22). Yet in his heart he had committed himself to Jesus (6:67–69), was willing to lay down his life for Jesus (13:37), jumped overboard to be with Jesus (21:7), and three times affirmed that he loved Jesus (21:15–17). The disciples were merely human beings, but just think of what God was about to do with them!
The divided and hostile world desperately needs the unifying power of the good news of love (cf. 3:16; 13:34; 17:26). Oneness in the community of believers is modeled on the interrelationship of the Father and the Son (“you are in me and I am in you”
The petition thus suggests that the oneness of the community is predicated on a direct relationship of the believers with the Godhead
When the world sees the church in harmony with God and with each other, the point of Jesus’ petition may be realized, namely, “that the world may believe that you have sent me.” Does this petition of Jesus not judge our church disputes as detrimental to the task of mission?