Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.15UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.15UNLIKELY
Fear
0.12UNLIKELY
Joy
0.59LIKELY
Sadness
0.5UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.63LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.97LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.45UNLIKELY
Extraversion
0.16UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.29UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.58LIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Introduction
Body
Ways of Looking at the Godhead
Atheism - The belief that there is no God
Agnosticism - The belief that the the existence of God is unknown, or unknowable
Pantheist - One who equates God with nature, or the forces of the universe
Polytheism - The belief that there is more than one God
Ditheism - The belief that there is two Gods
Tritheism - The belief that there is three Gods
Monotheism - The belief that there is one God
Two tendencies within Monotheism
One group asserts that there is one God, but only by denying the deity of Jesus Christ.
These groups relegate Jesus to that of a created god, subordinate god, or junior god
The other group believes in one God, but further believes that fulness of the Godhead is manifested in Jesus Christ
Trinitarianism - The belief that there are three distinct persons in the Godhead — God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit — but yet one God
Two extreme tendencies within Trinitarianism
Some emphasize the unity of God without having a clear understanding of what is meant by three distinct persons in the Godhead
Others emphasize the three distinct persons to the point of believing in three distinct, self-conscious beings.
They are essentially tritheistic.
We assert that the biblical teaching of the Godhead is that of Monotheism of the kind that professes that the fulness of the Godhead is in Jesus Christ.
Some Things to Keep in Mind
Our understanding of who God is is extremely important
It must conform to scripture as God has revealed Himself to us.
It’s got to be true!
I Chronicles 28:9 “9 And thou, Solomon my son, know thou the God of thy father, and serve him with a perfect heart and with a willing mind: for the Lord searcheth all hearts, and understandeth all the imaginations of the thoughts: if thou seek him, he will be found of thee; but if thou forsake him, he will cast thee off for ever.”
Philippians 3:10 “10 That I may know him, and the power of his resurrection, and the fellowship of his sufferings, being made conformable unto his death;”
False doctrines existed even in the Apostolic Age (i.e., gnosticism, montanism, etc.)
God’s Word is the only true and authoritative source of truth, including our understanding of the Godhead.
History cannot let us know what is true and what is false.
We will see a departure from the truth and supremacy of Scripture into human reason and philosophy
We cannot begin with our idea of truth and ask God to confirm it in His Word.
We must begin with the truth of Scripture and let that inform our understanding.
God always has a remnant reserved for Himself in every period of history
I Kings 19:14 “14 And he said, I have been very jealous for the Lord God of hosts: because the children of Israel have forsaken thy covenant, thrown down thine altars, and slain thy prophets with the sword; and I, even I only, am left; and they seek my life, to take it away.”
I Kings 19:18 “18 Yet I have left me seven thousand in Israel, all the knees which have not bowed unto Baal, and every mouth which hath not kissed him.”
The crowd is not always right
I Kings 18 - 450 prophets of Baal vs. one prophet of the God of Israel, Elijah.
I Kings 22 - 400 prophets foretold victory to king Ahab, but one prophet, Michaiah, prophesied failure and Ahab’s death.
Michaiah was correct and the 400 were wrong.
It requires revelation from God to understand His Word
John 16:13 “13 Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come.”
Matthew 16:15-17 “15 He saith unto them, But whom say ye that I am? 16 And Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God. 17 And Jesus answered and said unto him, Blessed art thou, Simon Bar-jona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven.”
Historical Teachings about the Godhead
Apostolic Age - The time of the Apostles
We’ll get more into this in the next lesson, as this will cover the biblical teaching on the Godhead, but briefly:
Strict Monotheism that asserted Jesus Christ was God manifest in the flesh
We find no assertions of a triune God either in the Old Testament or in the New Testament
We do find references such as “son”, “father”, etc.
Those will be discussed in later lessons.
Second Century - A.D. 100 - A.D. 200
Clement of Rome - Bishop of Rome in the 90’s.
He speaks of the “sufferings of God” on the cross
According to him, the church is Christ’s flock, and He is its Lord
He greatly exalts Jesus Christ in his writings
Ignatius - Bishop of Antioch.
He was martyred by being thrown to the lions
He asserts the importance of the church’s obligation to properly represent Christ to the world
About the incarnation he says, “Our God, Jesus the Christ, was conceived in the womb of Mary according to a dispensation.”
He speaks of “the passion of my God,” “the blood of God,” and “Jesus Christ our God.”
“There is one God who manifested Himself through Jesus Christ.”
Polycarp - Bishop of Smyrna.
At age 86 he was burned at the stake.
He tells us of “the coming of our Lord in flesh.”
The New Catholic Encyclopedia says concerning trinitarianism in the second century, “Among the Apostolic Fathers, there had been nothing even remotely approaching such a mentality or perspective; among the second century Apologists, little more than a focusing of the problem as that of plurality within the Godhead…a trinitarian solution was still in the future.”
To sum up: During the second century there is no mention of a trinitarian idea of the Godhead.
The only thing we see, not only in scripture, but also in the writings of the Post-Apostolic Age, is that of the Oneness of God.
Third Century - A.D. 200 - A.D. 300
Praxeas - Itinerant preacher and teacher
His teachings gave Christ His proper degree of divinity by making Him one with the Father
He taught that the Father was the Spirit which is God, and that the Son designated the flesh or human element of Christ
He taught in Rome and met with no opposition from anyone
In other words, his views on the Godhead represented at least the majority view of Christians in his day.
Noetus of Smyrna (in Asia Minor)
Taught that Father and Son were different aspects of the same being
He said that the Father took flesh of Mary and became Son
The Son was the Manhood, the Father, the Godhead
Epigonus of Rome
A disciple of Noetus
Taught at Rome the doctrine of Noetus
Cleomenes
Successor to Epigonus
Taught the doctrine of Epigonus and Noetus
Sabellius - presbyter of Pentapolis in North Africa
Became the successor of Cleomentes in Rome teaching that there is only one person in the Godhead
in 260 A.D., Dionysius of Alexandria tried to refute the followers of Sabellius.
In doing so he introduced tritheism and was reprimanded by the Bishop of Rome.
Sabellius asserted that Father, Son, and Holy Ghost were not distinct persons but modes of one divine person
Because of this his doctrine was termed Modalistic Monarchianism.
If you subscribed to this belief, you would be labeled a Modalist.
God was Father in creation, Son in redemption, and Holy Ghost in regeneration.
In the following generations, the doctrine of one person in the Godhead became associated with this man, Sabelliansim.
People in later generations who would be condemned for subscribing to this doctrine would be labeled Sabellians.
Tertullian of Carthage
Often called “the Father of Western Theology”
Later in life he joined the Montanists who at this point had been expelled from the church for heretical teachings
He opposed the Bishop of Rome of his day (probably Victor) for embracing Modalism and rejecting Montanism
Tertullian was the first christian writer to call God a trinity.
He’s also the first writer to speak of God as three person in one substance.
Church historians generally refer to him as the “father of Christian trinitarianism”
Louis Berkhof, in The History of Christian Doctrines states, “It may be said that he enlarged the doctrine of the Logos into a doctrine of the trinity…Tertullian was the first to assert clearly the tripersonality of God.”
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9