Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.13UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.1UNLIKELY
Fear
0.08UNLIKELY
Joy
0.65LIKELY
Sadness
0.47UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.58LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.64LIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.81LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.46UNLIKELY
Extraversion
0.52LIKELY
Agreeableness
0.55LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.62LIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Welcome
I heard a speaker named Patrick Lencioni share a really counterintuitive coaching strategy.
He and another dad coached his son’s soccer team, and this particular league did a big draft.
On the day of the draft, all the players and coaches got together and ran drills, demonstrated skills and then had a big draft to pick teams.
I remember Lencioni sharing that he and his assistant coach made it a point to ignore the kids who were obviously the best players.
The ones demonstrating crazy dribbling skills, killer corner kicks and probably even those sick bicycle kicks.
No, he said they looked for kids who were really engaged with the other players.
The kids who were really positive, excited to be out there.
Not the kids who never made a mistake, but the kids who never made the same mistake twice.
The ones who were coachable.
He said that a crazy thing happened - when it came time to draft teams, they got every single one of their picks.
And then an even crazier thing happened - they had an amazing season.
I don’t remember if they won first place or not, but Lencioni said that all the kids loved it.
The parents did too - none of the drama that often comes with having all-star kids on a team.
They learned a lot, they improved massively as a team and they had an incredible season.
Because Lencioni and his assistant coach realized there was something broken about the typical way sports drafts work - even at the level of kids’ sports.
That maybe skill with a ball isn’t the only - or best - skill for a team.
(Tell that to Jamie Tart, am I right, Ted Lasso fans?)
Lencioni’s insight applies to our question for today: What makes a good disciple?
If you’re going out to share the good news about Jesus, who are you going to talk to?
If you were to imagine the ideal convert.
Who is that?
A business leader who can donate lots of money?
Or maybe a celebrity - a rock star or movie star who can use their platform to tell more people?
Or what about a politician - someone in office who could genuinely represent the way of Jesus at the highest levels of government (you know, instead of giving lip service then ignoring anything Jesus actually taught).
Fame.
Power.
Wealth.
Are these the things that make someone an ideal follower of Jesus?
You’d think so, to look at Evangelicalism today.
We’re obsessed with Kanye’s Sunday Services, who Justin Bieber calls his pastor, and how much money various pastors’ sneakers cost.
But what if we’re doing it wrong?
What if God’s not all that impressed with fame, wealth or power?
Message
Welcome to Easter-tide!
We’re in the season of hope - the time between Easter and Pentecost, between resurrection and God’s gift to us of the Holy Spirit.
Our series is called RECONNECTED.
We’re asking what it looks like to be plugged in - both to God and to the world to which God calls us.
What are the practices, attitudes and orientations God calls us to and gifts us with that enable us to be a church that engages and cares about the world around us?
For these questions, we’re in the book of Acts, which recounts the beginnings of the church.
How did we go from a group of scared people who fled from the authorities when Jesus was arrested to a group that faced down persecution and fearlessly spread the good news of Jesus’ resurrection to the world around us?
I hope we find a reflection of ourselves in those transformed disciples.
I hope this series stretches our imagination about what is possible in our city, in our families, in our world today.
How can we recover the same sort of bold faith we in those first followers in the wake of Jesus’ resurrection?
We began by reflecting on the impossibility of our call - to embody Jesus in this broken and breaking world?
How could we possibly accomplish all God call us to?
We can’t, which is why God gives us the Holy Spirit.
Then we explored what it means to worship together, and to be together in a way that orients us not toward ourselves, but to the larger world, especially those who are most vulnerable.
Today, I want to look again at an important question Luke keeps asking in the book of Acts, one that Luke himself seems to wrestle with: What makes a good disciple?
Is it wealth?
Fame?
Power?
All of the above?
Turn with us to Acts 17.
If you were here last week, you remember that the good news of Jesus’ resurrection was particularly attractive to those on the margins, those already excluded from mainstream culture.
We also saw that those we might call ‘respectable’ were afraid to be too closely associated with the Jesus people.
This is a reality Luke - the author of Acts - was well aware of.
In his Gospel, he introduced us to the Rich Young Ruler, who refused Jesus’ call to sell everything he had and give it to the poor.
Luke was well aware of the class dynamics at work in Jesus’ ministry - he reports Jesus preaching that the poor are especially blessed, and that it’s difficult for the wealthy to find the Kingdom of God.
So all of that makes these stories in Acts 17 particularly fascinating.
At this point in Acts, we’ve shifted from Peter and the church in Jerusalem to Paul and his missionary journeys to spread the good news of Jesus across the world.
In this particular journey, he stops in several cities in Greece.
Today, we’re going to compare his stop in Thessalonica and Berea.
At this point, the fledgling Jesus movement has become somewhat well-known.
Rumors and reports about the movement popping up - largely thanks to Paul - in a number of cities around the Mediterranean are spreading.
And the young church - which at this time is still being called the Way - has gained a reputation for disruption.
What kind of disruption?
They’re proclaiming a king other than Caesar - Jesus, resurrected from the dead and ascended to the throne not of earth, but of all creation.
Everywhere Paul and Silas have gone, the status quo is disrupted.
In one place, a Roman guard converted to faith after a prison break.
Elsewhere, a riot broke out after Paul and Silas cast a demon out of an enslaved girl.
Why?
Because she had been telling fortunes, and her enslavers were angry that their prophet wasn’t generating any more profit.
In other words, the Way was disrupting the way of things.
Now, one other note.
In Acts, Paul’s typical pattern of mission work was to go first to the local synagogue.
This was a gathering of men and women, both Jewish and Gentile, and they discussed faith.
So it was a natural place for Paul, Jewish himself, to go.
Outside of Judea, Judaism was a minority religion.
Think of Buddhism here in the US - though it’s predominantly an Eastern religion, there are a number of Americans who are interested in Buddhism - back in the 90s, it was even super trendy for celebrities to claim to be Buddhist.
That’s something like what we’re going to see in these two stories.
There was a tension in the diaspora Jewish communities - some wanted to acclimate to the dominant Roman culture, while others were more open to the radical message of Jesus.
And there were also a number of Gentiles - even some prominent city leaders - who were curious enough to check out this strange faith that only believed in one God.
But still that question: do any of these people make good converts?
Let’s see what happens, first in Thessalonica and then in Berea:
Paul goes to the synagogue and spends three weeks reinterpreting the Scriptures to illustrate that Jesus is God’s Messiah, and that his resurrection is the revolutionary moment they’ve been waiting for.
A few of the Jewish people were interested, and a surprising number of Greeks and, Luke notes, ‘quite a few prominent women.”
This upsets the majority of the Jewish leaders in Thessalonica, so they go after Paul and Silas.
Listen to what they do:
There’s a deep irony here - the people who accused Paul and Silas of causing trouble were the ones causing trouble.
They broke into a Greek man’s home, dragged him and his friends before the city.
They spread rumors and hearsay, stirring up the whole city against the Way.
This is a common experience in minority cultures - there is always a voice or two that wants to maintain the status quo.
These voices are often prominent - they have access to governmental authorities or they are a celebrity of some kind.
Majority culture elevates these voices specifically because they help to maintain the status quo.
You see this, for instance, any time Black Lives Matter protests take place.
Suddenly Black Americans who criticize BLM protests get facetime on news media and their videos flood our social media feeds.
Because they affirm the status quo - one from which they benefit.
So even though their voices represent a vanishingly small percentage of the perspective of Black Americans, it’s their voice that gets elevated.
The same thing is happening in Thessalonica.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9