Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.59LIKELY
Disgust
0.11UNLIKELY
Fear
0.13UNLIKELY
Joy
0.55LIKELY
Sadness
0.51LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.74LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.78LIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.85LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.39UNLIKELY
Extraversion
0.18UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.15UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.73LIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Conflict
A competitive or opposing action of incompatibles.
What is for dinner?
Ta’Molly’s vs. Demo’s
We can go to TaMolly’s or we can go to Demo’s or we can go somewhere else, or we can not go anywhere.
More serious conflict arise where we are emotionally tied to one idea or another.
When who we are is wrapped up into one position.
I believe that Jesus was a real person, that He performed miracles, that He claimed to be one with God, that He died on a Roman Cross for the payment of the sins of the world, and that he really raised from the dead on the third day.
With that, I cannot compromise.
I also believe this is a building that we gather in.
It is not some Holy Place on consecrated ground.
It’s an old Gas Station and the only thing that make it Holy is the purpose in which we use it and have no problem with someone doing a burnout in the building.
That said, if we as a group decided that we shouldn’t do that any longer....I would be ok with that.
I could compromise on that.
The problem with churches today is this:
1.
They either hide the fact that conflict’s occur.
Superficial and fake.
2. They avoid any conflict at all costs.
They compromise on the Gospel.
3.
They emotionally connect with every decision they make.
constant state of turmoil.
Stupid arguments:
Argument over the appropriate length of the worship pastor’s beard
Dispute over weather or not to install restroom stall dividers in the women’s bathroom.
An argument and vote to decide if a clock in the worship center should be removed.
A fight over which picture of Jesus to put in the foyer.
An argument on whether the church should allow deviled eggs at the church meal.
A disagreement over using the term “potluck” instead of “pot blessing”.
One church split occured because a church member hid the vacuum cleaner from other members.
Well that’s stupid.
And I agree with you the reason for these conflicts was stupid, but not resolving even stupid conflict, has very serious consequences.
Conflict in the early church:
Hellenistic Jews: Greek speaking.
Hebrews: traditional
Their widows were being overlooked.
There is an accusation of partiality.
So, they would want it to stop, but the temptation would be to hold a grudge because it ever happened at all.
They gathered the church.
It is not desirable for us to neglect the word of God in order to serve tables.
The Solution:
Full of the Spirit and of wisdom.
The result:
Edgar Allen Poe said, “Believe nothing you hear and only half of what you see.”
I believe half of what you say, but all of what you do.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9