Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.14UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.09UNLIKELY
Fear
0.08UNLIKELY
Joy
0.61LIKELY
Sadness
0.46UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.64LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.46UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.97LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.73LIKELY
Extraversion
0.18UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.29UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.78LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
INTRODUCTION
-Daniel and his friends completed the 3 year training to become some of the top advisors in King Nebuchadnezzar’s court.
One night Nebuchadnezzar had a distressing dream and called some of his enchanters and magicians to both tell him the dream and its interpretation.
When they could not tell him the dream, the king in his anger ordered the death of all his top cabinet members, including Daniel and the other three.
When told of the kings order, Daniel was allowed to approach the king and he asked for a period of time to try to figure out how to help the king.
Given that time, Daniel and his friends immediately went to the Lord in prayer and earnestly and persistently sought God’s face about the matter.
In answer to the prayer, God gave Daniel the dream and its interpretation.
Daniel and his friends again went to the Lord in prayer and gave God thanks and praise.
This is where we pick up the story.
-Daniel approached Arioch, the captain of the king’s guard who was given the task of killing all the wisemen, and asked to be brought before the king.
Wanting to get some credit or recognition, Arioch tells the king that HE found someone to interpret the dream.
He emphasizes that Daniel is from among the captives of Judah.
It is interesting to note that all of the Babylonian enchanters and magicians could not give the answer that the king sought.
The gods that these guys sought after couldn’t provide the answer.
However, a Jew who follows Yahweh has the answer because Yahweh has all the answers.
-But Daniel quickly lets the king know that it was not him who came up with the answer.
In fact, there is no human on earth who would be able to do what the king asked the people in his government to do.
There is only One who could give that information, and that is Yahweh God.
God is the one who gave the king the dream to begin with, so only God could give the details of the dream and what it means.
-This is so important—when we are able to do something, we don’t take credit for ourselves, but we give God all the glory and honor for what has been accomplished.
We don’t have the power or wisdom or know-how within ourselves to accomplish anything of any significance.
If anything of godly, eternal worth happens it is all of God and we must be quick to give God the credit.
Just last week I was telling someone an idea, and I added this fine print saying: if it’s a good idea then God is the One who gave it; if it’s a bad idea it was all on me.
-As one author pointed out:
Daniel (True Humility)
There is a model here for all of us in our relationships with those who do not know our God.
In contrast to the self-promoting way of the world, we should constantly seek occasions to exalt and declare publicly the praises of our God.
Whatever gifts and abilities we have, whatever successes we may meet with in life, all of them are ultimately the work of the one who gave us those gifts and opportunities, along with the diligence and perseverance to pursue them.
We are simply God’s servants, doing the work he has assigned to us; he deserves all of the praise and adoration.
The biblical word for this attitude is humility: the perspective that sees our own size rightly in comparison to the surpassing greatness of our God.
-That is our attitude.
I know that we love to get the attaboys and pats on the back (like Arioch did), but it is not us.
It is God working in us and through us to will and to do according to His good pleasure.
God gave the king the dream and the answer, it had nothing to do with Daniel or anybody else.
Daniel was merely the vessel through whom God spoke.
And we are merely the vessels through whom God works.
He gets all the credit and honor and glory for whatever happens through us.
-So, Daniel begins giving the report that God gave to him.
The night of the dream the king had gone to bed thinking about the future and stability of his own reign.
God revealed to the king what would happen in the future regarding his own kingdom as well as other kingdoms that were to come.
The entire course of history is in God’s hands, and He is moving it toward His own intended goal.
And God wants to make sure that Nebuchadnezzar understood that.
So, Daniel first tells the king the details of the dream as the king had requested.
-Daniel fulfills the first part of the king’s request—he is able to describe the dream itself.
The king saw a large statue that caused him to be terribly frightened (and it will serve as a pattern for something the king would do later in chapter 3).
It actually might be called a colossus in it’s most literal form because the word means a statue of gigantic size and proportion.
It is obviously a statue that depicts a human of some sort because of the parts of the statue that are described.
This might be an indication that whatever the statue represents is manmade.
Each section of the body is made of different material.
As you move down the statue, the material becomes less valuable and less impressive.
The head was of gold.
The chest and arms were of silver.
From the waist to the knees(or from the stomach to the knees) was of bronze.
Then from the knees to the ankles was of iron.
And the feet were a mixture of iron and clay.
-There was then a rock that had not been hewn out of stone by human hands or instruments.
Where the stone came from is not stated and who hurled the stone at the statue is not stated.
The stone represented something supernatural.
While the statue is manmade, the stone is God-made.
It struck the statue at the feet, and the entire statue came tumbling down turning to dust which is then blown away by the wind and all traces of the statue disappear.
But the stone became a huge mountain that would go forth and fill the earth.
It started small and then grew larger until it became much bigger and covered more ground than the statue or any part of the statue.
-That is one strange dream.
I know I’ve had a lot of strange dreams, but this probably beats even them.
But the king knows that the dream has significance.
Indeed it does, because God was letting Nebuchadnezzar know what was going to happen in the future with regard to world history.
Thankfully we are not left wondering what the dream means because Daniel also gives the interpretation.
-Daniel begins the interpretation first reminding Nebuchadnezzar that all the power and might that he has comes from God. God has indeed given Nebuchadnezzar great power and strength and riches and influence, even over areas not directly under his control.
Daniel makes it known that he is the head of gold, meaning that the Babylonian Empire was the head of gold (the kings and their kingdoms were interchangeable in reference to one another).
In its heyday Babylon was quite powerful.
-Thus, each section of the statue represented an earthly kingdom, an empire, that would have power specifically over the land of Israel.
And it is kept in the back of the mind that God is the one in control and He raises and brings down empires as He sees fit.
Most scholars and theologians are pretty much in agreement of the meaning of the top four sections of this statue.
The head of gold is Babylon.
After Babylon would come an empire that would be inferior, and that would be the Medo-Persian Empire (the arms and chest of silver).
The question should be asked how these subsequent empires were inferior since they actually controlled more land than Babylon.
Many think that it has to do with morality.
Each subsequent empire would become more and more corrupt, and that truly seems to be the case.
-After the Medo-Persian Empire would come another empire, most likely referring to the Greek Empire, or sometimes referred to as the Greco-Macedonian Empire (the middle section of bronze).
After this would come the empire of iron that would very much have the strength to crush everything in its way, and this refers to the Roman Empire.
That all seems pretty straight forward—the statue is showing a straight line of empires, one right after the other, that would have control and power over Israel.
These empires will succeed one right after the other.
The Babylonians fell to Medes and Persians, who fell to Greece, who fell to the Romans.
It’s the feet and the timing of the stone where many people part ways from one another in their interpretation.
-Some interpret the feet mixture of iron and clay to be an end-time Empire that must have some sort of connection to the Roman Empire since there is iron there.
If that is the case, then the rock represents Christ’s second coming to set up His earthly reign (because it is without a doubt that the rock represents Christ setting up the kingdom of God).
They assume that the feet would have ten toes, correspond it with ten horns on a beast in chapter 7, and believe that this final empire would consist of ten kingdoms jointly ruling a the time of Christ’s return.
I think you have to be careful in assuming things.
Where the Bible remains silent it’s best we do too.
Daniel did not fixate on ten toes so we probably shouldn’t read into things that are not there.
-Others believe that the feet are just a representation of how the Roman Empire would become fragile and the stone represents Christ’s first coming, setting up the Kingdom of God in the rule and reign of the hearts of people all over the world.
-I personally believe that this latter interpretation would make more sense.
There is nothing that would indicate some sort of gap between the legs and the feet required of the previous interpretation.
The statue is one piece and each section naturally flows into the next section, indicating a natural flow of governmental powers over the region.
Babylon falls to the Persians who fall to the Greeks who fall to the Romans.
The Roman Empire, while strong, also has some weak spots, especially as it mixed with some of the Germanic tribes.
Or it quite possibly represents the split of the empire between east and west.
-One author describes it this way:
As diversity of languages split up the Tower of Babel, so the inability of cultures within this empire to live in peace dismantles this behemoth of destruction.
Multiculturalism would become tribalism and the social and political fabric of the empire would not hold.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9