Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.13UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.13UNLIKELY
Fear
0.13UNLIKELY
Joy
0.5LIKELY
Sadness
0.19UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.63LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.29UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.9LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.17UNLIKELY
Extraversion
0.07UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.11UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.45UNLIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
The message of the prophet Joel is one of judgement, warning, repentance, and blessing.
Key to understanding Joel’s message to the nation of Judah, and to a proper application to church age saints is the identification of the locust plagues.
What do the locusts plagues refer to?
To answer this question we will briefly overview the major viewpoints, we will examine the identity of the locusts in Joel 1, we will examine the identity of the locusts in Joel 2, and in conclusion we will briefly overview how the locust plagues fit into the overall message of the book.
Three Views of Locusts and Time
Allegorical / Eschatological view
In this view both Joel 1 and 2 are interpreted to be Israel’s future enemies.
This approach does not give much weight to a normal, historical, or literal hermeneutic and thus deserves little attention
2. Historical / Eschatological view
In this view Joel 1:1-2:17 is speaking of one past even of literal locusts, and 2:18 ff. is speaking of future eschatological judgement.
3. Historical / Near future / Far Future view
In this view Joel 1 speaks of a past event of literal locusts, Joel 2 compares the locusts plague to a near future invasion by the enemies of Judah, and the final section of Joel speaks of eschatological (far future) Day of the Lord judgments.
The Identity of the Locusts in Joel 1
The prophet Joel is using the recent past event of a literal locust plague to preach a message of repentance to Judah.
The only view that does not understand the locusts of Joel chapter one to be literal locusts is the allegorical/eschatological view.
There are several indications that Joel 1 is speaking of a real locusts plague.
How could this event be told to the future generations of the people if it is speaking allegorically of future enemies?
Second, the descriptions given in the text most naturally point to literal locusts.
Also, in vv.
8-20 the destruction is spoken of in agriculture terms (fields, grain, wine, oil, etc…).
This would make perfect sense if the locusts were literal locusts.
Third, a locusts plague was one of the curses of the Mosaic Covenant.
One of the purposes of Joel was to call the people to repentance.
If the people were living in disobedience to the covenant, it would be in line with the curses of the covenant for the Lord to send a real locusts plague.
The Identity of the Locusts in Joel 2
The identity of the locusts in chapter two is more difficult to come to a unified understanding.
The historical/eschatological view understands Joel 2:1-17 to refer to real locusts while 2:18-3:21 refers to far future human invaders.
The historical/near future/far future view understands Joel 2:1-17 to speak of a near future invasion under the figure of locusts, while 2:18-27 serves as a transition from near to far future events.
Finally Joel 2:28ff.
looks to an eschatological end.
It seems best to understand Joel 2:1-17 as referring to a near future invasion of a human army.
Joel is using the past event of the locust plague in chapter one to warn the people of a future event that will be even more catastrophic unless the nation turns to God in repentance.
Argument #1
The reason one sounds an alarm is warn people of a coming event that has not happened yet.
If chapter 2 continues speaking of the past locust plague why would Joel warn the people for a danger that was already past?
The idea of the text is something like, “You thought the locust plague was bad, if you don’t repent God is going to send an even worse plague—a conquering army.”
Argument #2
There is a definite escalation in judgement from chapter one to chapter two.
In chapter one the locusts were primarily interested in the fields and crops.
In chapter two the human army is primarily interested in the cities of Judah.
Real locusts would have an interest in fields and crops and trees.
They would have much less interest in entering people’s homes like thieves to steal their possessions.
This seems to speak of a human army not grasshoppers.
Also, this is the exact progression from curses in nature to curses in battle that is foretold in Deuteronomy 28:38-65
Arguments Against a near future human army #1
One of the arguments against chapter two speaking of a human army is that the description of the great and powerful people of v. 2 is more locust like than people like.
Phrases like “blackness spread upon the mountains”, “like the appearance of horses”, “leap on the tops of the mountains” are more fitting of bugs than humans.
What is going on here?
This is a powerful literary device employed by the prophet.
He does not abandon the locust figure of chapter one, but instead he uses the imagery to vividly paint a picture of the invading army.
When Joel looked upon the locust swarm, he saw with prophetic eyes a future mass of human soldiers swarming the lands of Judah as the army of Yahweh.
It was as if he saw the locusts of chapter one morphing into soldiers and cavalry before his very eyes.
Arguments Against a near future human army #2
Another objection to chapter two referring to a human army are the phrases “like a mighty army up for battle.”
Joel could not have meant a human army, for how could a mighty army be like a mighty army (so also the calvary in v. 4)?
However, the Hebrew preposition for “like” (ke-) can also be used as an expression to describe exactly or precisely what something is like.
Here the Day of the Lord comes “as (ke-) devastation from the Almighty.”
The preposition as or like is describing exactly what something is like.
The Day of the Lord judgement is exactly like destruction from the Almighty.
Conclusion
The prophet Joel was calling the nation of Judah to repentance.
He masterfully used a real locusts plague as pictured in chapter one to call the people to mourn and lament.
Then he used that vivid imagery to warn the people of an even greater locust-like threat, a near future invasion of a human army.
If the people did not repent God would send even greater judgement for their rebellion and disobedience.
Apparently, Joel’s preaching of repentance worked (2:12-17), and God had pity on his people and restored the land from the devastation of the locust plague (2:18-27).
This prompted Joel to prophesy of a future day of the Lord where God would pour out his Spirit on all flesh (2:28-29) and would judge all nations (3:1-16).
In that future glorious day Judah will be fully restored to the Lord and will be holy and strangers shall never again pass through it (3:17).
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9