Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.57LIKELY
Disgust
0.18UNLIKELY
Fear
0.11UNLIKELY
Joy
0.23UNLIKELY
Sadness
0.63LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.62LIKELY
Confident
0.43UNLIKELY
Tentative
0UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.95LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.51LIKELY
Extraversion
0.14UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.49UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.47UNLIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Federal Headship is vital importsant doctrine, yet one of the most neglected.
Without understanding federal headship we will never understand how the death of Christ can effect us.
You are I are saved, not by our works, but on the basis of someone else - Jesus Christ.
But why did we need saving in the first place?
From our sins.
Well God did not make us sinnes, so why do we sin?
Same evrse:
The history of humanity is based on only 2 people:
The first Adam and the second Adam:
Adam is not just a person delegated to ancinet history.
Each and every sinle human being born through natural descent is a decendant of Adam and Eve.
Lets read this account:
Key here is:
Adam was the representative of all those who would come from him.
in like manner Christ is the representative of all those who would be born of him.
So when Adam sinned - many were made sinners.
And likewise when Jesus Christ was obedient - many were made righteous.
This is the very essence of the atonment subsitutionary death of Jesus Christ.
Now, lets look closer:
Adam was disobedient when he ate the fruit.
That act of disobedience made all his offsring disobedint like Adam.
Now some would aurgu and say “How is it fair that i am punished for Adam’s sin?
I did not eat the fruit.”
And that is true - none of us ate the fruit so why are we guilty of doing something we never did?
The answer is Seminalism.
Its a bit of a crude word and it means literally “from the semen of”
Its a biblical concept that we see clearly in Hebrews 7.
Hebrews 7 shows us that the priesthood of Jesus (Malkisadek) is greater than the priesthood of Levi.
It shows this by pointing out that Abraham tithed to Malchizakec.
But in Abraham, all the 12 tribes including Levi would come.
So when Abraham tithed, Levi tithed as well, because Levi was “from the semen of Abraham
This concept of “being in the lions” is Seminalism and it has powerful and profound implications for us.
We were “in the lions” of Adam.
So:
Whatever weakness, bad judgment, temptation was in Adam that caused him to sin, is in us as well.
If you or I had been in Adams place, we would have done exacally the same as him.
This is vitally important for our case.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9