Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.14UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.1UNLIKELY
Fear
0.1UNLIKELY
Joy
0.57LIKELY
Sadness
0.48UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.66LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.01UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.93LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.78LIKELY
Extraversion
0.32UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.52LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.63LIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Heading into a new series.
Looking at Paul's Epistle to the Galatians.
Unearthing what Paul was saying within the book of Galatians.
This epistle is about understanding or unearthing the history, the people looking at the historical nature and the reasons for Paul writing, not giving into predispositions or even looking at want everyone else said it.
But looking right at the central idea of what Paul was writing about and the context in which he was saying it.
You will not find, in all of scripture a more powerful, influential and that carries as much weight and clot, especially when it comes to matters of the law.
Thank about this.
When you talk about the law, the book of Galatians is going to come into the conversation.
I have had more conversations with Pastor’s, and teachers.
and with so many Christians about the law, and everyone of them, have brought Galatians up.
The Mark that this book has left on Christianity is like no other book.
Many even hold this book higher then that of the Gospels, and the life of Yeshua.
It is that influential.
I would argue that this book, the book of Galatians is the most influential, but its also, get ready, the most controversial books.
I want share a quote from a commentary, of a well known apologetics
F. F. Bruce apologist who is no longer with us, I want to share something He said
“The traditional criterion in the canonical arrangement of the Pauline letters, as far back as it can be traced, appears to have been (in a) descending order of length”.
Transition back to Galatians
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9