Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.05UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.05UNLIKELY
Fear
0.03UNLIKELY
Joy
0.58LIKELY
Sadness
0.66LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.66LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.92LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.39UNLIKELY
Extraversion
0.2UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.75LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.35UNLIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
! *Making Repentance Clear - 03*
!! */Who Owes Who?/ *
This study investigates the 3rd of 5 principles drawn from Daniel’s portrayal of clear repentance as described in *Daniel 9:7-10*.
Daniel’s relationship with God included a clear understanding of what belongs to God and what belongs to sinful men.
Unlike Esau, who mourned his loss but not his sin, Daniel did not barter with God for a blessing while bypassing shame for his sinful behavior.
A profound sense of personal and public debt produced /*“confusion of face”*/ (KJV) or /*“open shame”*/ (NKJV).
Daniel was not interested in a tickling message that touched the sin wound lightly while pronouncing, /*“Peace, Peace; when there is no peace.”
*/
Knowing something of the glory, honour, and blessedness of His Redeemer, Daniel poured out his heart in the language of mourning love, otherwise known as Repentance.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9