Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.11UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.09UNLIKELY
Fear
0.11UNLIKELY
Joy
0.61LIKELY
Sadness
0.55LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.52LIKELY
Confident
0.37UNLIKELY
Tentative
0UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.93LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.71LIKELY
Extraversion
0.12UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.26UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.75LIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Introduction
Daniel 11 is possibly the most prophetic passage in the entire Bible.
It has very detailed prophecy of the kings, kingdoms, and conflicts between the time of Daniel and the first coming of the Messiah.
From Daniel’s perspective, these prophecies were future, but from our perspective, they have been fulfilled in history.
This passage has caused many Bible critics to think that Daniel didn’t actually write the scroll of Daniel, because the prophecies are so specific.
They conclude it must have been written after the fact.
In this chapter, we will meet possibly the most evil villain in Israel’s history; the one who desecrated the temple.
But we will also see God’s providential hand guiding the course of history, setting the stage for His kingdom to come in Jesus.
Given the nature of this passage, it would be very difficult to listen to an in depth verse by verse explanation in this small amount of time.
Instead, I will give us an overview of what is going on, pointing out the highlights and stopping at historically significant places.
We will spend more time discussing the villain I mentioned above, called “the madman” by the Jews.
Then once we have completed our survey, we will discuss how this text displays God’s providence in a glorious light.
I. Persian & Greek Empires
Persian Kings - vv.1-2
v.2a “Three more kings shall arise in Persia…”
Cambyses, son of Cyrus (530 - 522)
Smerdis Magus (522)
Darius, son of Hystaspes (521 - 486)
v.2b “...A fourth shall be richer than all of them…”
Xerxes (486 - 465): Also known as Ahasuerus, the same king that Esther married.
v.2c“...He shall stir up all against the kingdom of Greece.”
Around 480 BC, King Xerxes gathered a massive force to invade Greece, hoping to completely conquer it to avenge his Father, King Darius’ failed first invasion.
Xerxes’ invasion was unsuccessful however, and the Greek navy and land forces, though fewer in number, proved to be superior.
Greece - United Kingdom v.3
“Then a mighty king shall arise who shall rule with great dominion and rule as he wills”
Alexander the Great is the mighty king in view here.
Alexander conquered most of the ancient world prior to his death at age 32.
From Xerxes death in 465 BC to Alexander the Great’s conquering of Persia in 334 BC, there is a time span of 131 years.
There were other Persian kings after Xerxes, but Xerxes is the primary Persian king in view in this prophecy due to his massive invasion of Greece and it’s failure.
That seems to be why the other Persian kings are skipped over and verse three moves right on to talking about Greece.
Greece - Divided Kingdom vv.4-20
“...his kingdom shall be broken and divided towards the four winds of heaven…”
After Alexander the Great’s death, his kingdom has divided between his four generals.
“...but not to his posterity, nor according to the authority with which he ruled…”
His kingdom went to his generals, not his descendants.
The Greek empire was significantly weaker once it was divided between the generals.
The glory of Greece was no more.
From verses 4-20, we see detailed prophecy regarding the “kings of the north” which was Greco-Syria, the “kings of the south” which would be Greco-Egypt and “the glorious land” which is Israel.
Keep in mind that all of the directions of the kingdoms are from the perspective of Jerusalem.
Starting in verse 21
II.
The Madman or The God-Man?
Antiochus Epiphanies IV vv.21-35
Antiochus IV reigned from 175 - 164 BC.
His Character
He was arrogant and worshiped himself.
He gave himself the name “Epiphanies”, which means “God manifest” or “Manifest one”.
He saw himself as a God-man.
He was a person who did not deserve respect.
- v.21a
In fact, Antiochus was so contemptible to the Jews that instead of calling him Epiphanies, they call him “Epiganies” which means “Madman”
He used flattery to get what he wanted.
- v.21b
He was a deceitful person.
- v.23
His heart was bent on doing evil.
- v.27
He hated God’s people.
- v28
Particularly the High Priest Onias III, called the “prince of the covenant” in verse 22. Antiochus hated Onias and the Jews for their resistance to Greek culture.
His Actions
He stole the throne from his other brother by sending him to exile in Rome.
-v.21
He had a very strong army that would destroy any in its path.
- v.22a
He was known for plundering everywhere he went.
He greed knew no end.
- v.24
He waged war against the Greco-Egyptian kingdom twice in his career.
The first campaign was in ad 169 and was very successful.
- v.25 - 27
After his first campaign against Greco-Egypt, while on his way back to Syria, he suspected an insurrection, and in response he stole treasures from the Jewish temple and massacred 80,000 Jews.
One year later, Antiochus invaded the Egypt again, fulfilling the prophecy in verse 29 “At the appointed time he shall return and come into the South”, but this time his campaign would not be successful.
The Greek empire in Egypt had acquired help from the “ships of Kittim”, which certainly refers to the Romans.
The Jewish historian, Flavius Josephus, who lived during the first century AD, mentions to the Jews, “Kittim” was nearly everything to the West on the Mediterranean, which would include many Islands, and even Italy.
With the help of the Romans, Antiochus was humiliated and had to return back to Syria with his army.
In verse 30, we see that in Antiochus’ anger turned his sights to Israel to let out his rage.
This would be one of the darkest times in Israel’s history, only matched by the complete destruction of Jerusalem in AD 70 by the Romans just a few centuries later.
What Antiochus proceeded to do is what Daniel calls the “Abomination of Desolation” in verse 31.
For 3 and a half years, until the end of Antiochus’ reign, he unleashed a horrific persecution against the Jews.
He put an end to the animal sacrifices, prohibited male circumcision, and prevented any other Jewish expression of worship.
Worst of all, his forces then went into the Jewish temple, plundered it, and set up an altar of Zeus in the Temple where he sacrificed pigs on the altar inside the temple.
During this time, there were many Jews that apostatized and began following Hellenistic culture and worship for the sake of avoiding persecution.
In response to all of these atrocities, a faithful remnant which we see in verse 32-35, will rise up, stand firm, and take action.
This is referring to the Maccabean revolt.
They were faithful to God and His law until the point of death, knowing that God would be glorified and would reward them eternally for their faithfulness.
Antiochus IV, Julius Caesar, or a Future Anti-Christ vv.36-45
It is at verse 36 to 12:3 that it is less clear who is in view.
There are three main interpretations of this final section:
“The King” in verse 36 is still referring to Antiochus IV.
“The King” is referring to the Roman Emperor, Julius Caesar.
“The King” is referring to an anti-christ figure in our future.
After much study, I find that options 1 and 2 are both plausible, while leaning more towards option 1 with this portion still referring to Antiochus IV.
It seems to me, as well as many Christian scholars and commentators, that what we see in 11:36-12:3 is a recapitulation or re-statement of verses 11:21-35, something common in Jewish literature.
There are many parallels between these two sections.
In verse 40, it says that “at the time of the end, the king of the South shall attack him, but the king of the North shall rush upon him like a whirlwind.”
Indicating that we are still talking about Greco-Syria and Greco-Egypt.
Indeed, this is the very context of the vision.
The time of the end does not here refer to the end of human history, but rather the end of this course of events, probably referring to the persecution and abomination of desolations mentioned earlier.
This is not referring to a future anti-christ figure.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9