Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.11UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.45UNLIKELY
Fear
0.07UNLIKELY
Joy
0.1UNLIKELY
Sadness
0.17UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.81LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.71LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.47UNLIKELY
Extraversion
0.05UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.25UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.69LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Kom ac fah akwoyeyuk Jerusalem (Isa.
66:6-14)
(v.3) indicate that the people’s religious sacrifices and offerings were only external ritual.
( 1) In their hearts the the people were murderers,
(2) perverts of God’s dietary laws (cf.
65:4; Lev.
11:7),
(3) idolaters,
*** (Isa.
53:6), they were going their own ways, rather than Lord’s ways.
*** Therefore harsh judgment would come.
**** The last 4 lines of 66:4 are almost identical with 65:12; see comments there.)
The Bible Knowledge Commentary (66:3–6)
People in Israel who professed to know the LORD but who actually hated and discriminated against God’s people would be shamed by His discipline when the temple would be destroyed by the Babylonians.
(Isaiah 66:7-11).
The Lord to give birth to His nation
(v.7),
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9